Re: Cathay Looking For Canadians
Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2019 2:18 pm
Is Cathay only hiring SO or are they also hiring FOs as well?
http://www.avcanada.ca/forums2/
I think it's a 7 year prorated payback on the big signing bonus they give you to help you get set up in HKG... If you leave in 3.5 years you pay half back.
4 years is pretty common to be an SO in the past (from chats with some of the FOs there), and I don't believe there is a single SO who has gone past 5 years yet (granted, some have upgraded with way less). The P2X rating is only valid for 5 years per Hong Kong's authority, and I think the only way to get around this is if the airline makes you redo the training (which is probably more expensive than just upgrading you), or just finds some way to circumvent this limitation.
Fair enough. Still amounts to the same thing right? It's a 7 year agreement, and they deduct it off your pay. Even if it's paying back a bonus.
And thats just the thing, they have found a way. 5 years is an arbitrary limit anyways, but now new SOs get a P1X (still not P1) rating. Its all part of a plan to restructure the airline from 1CN 2FO 1SO Long haul to 1CN 1FO 2SO Long haul. Therefore, they need fewer FOs and more SOs. So upgrade times are at the 5 year mark right now, but if anything it will increase or best case it remains the same. There are plenty of cadets joining with 0 hours, so they'll have more than enough recruits. It just saves cathay a bit of cash if you join with a CPL that YOU paid for, rather than a cadet who haid his/hers paid for by Cathay
. . . The P2X rating is only valid for 5 years per Hong Kong's authority. . . or just finds some way to circumvent this limitation. . . .The airline underwent some rather illogical cost-cutting measures. They are crewing 2 SOs for some of their long haul flights now
Does Singapore even hire expats anymore? I thought they kicked them all out at one point.C-GGGQ wrote: ↑Sun Feb 10, 2019 8:55 pm My mistake. It wasn't Cathay it was Singapore.
Bond
Successful candidates will be required to serve the employer company for the duration of the training and for a period of seven years from the date of appointment as First Officer.
For ab initio, direct so or fo. 7 years doesn't even kick in till FO upgrade though.
Dingbatt, do you know anyone who has physically received a P1X rating recently? I legitimately want to know, as I posed this question up the grapevine once several months back, and most of the guys thought it was more of a Cathay thing than an actual rating (since there is neither reference of a P1X at HKCAD's site, nor is there reference in ops D).Dingbatt wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 12:57 pmAnd thats just the thing, they have found a way. 5 years is an arbitrary limit anyways, but now new SOs get a P1X (still not P1) rating. Its all part of a plan to restructure the airline from 1CN 2FO 1SO Long haul to 1CN 1FO 2SO Long haul. Therefore, they need fewer FOs and more SOs. So upgrade times are at the 5 year mark right now, but if anything it will increase or best case it remains the same. There are plenty of cadets joining with 0 hours, so they'll have more than enough recruits. It just saves cathay a bit of cash if you join with a CPL that YOU paid for, rather than a cadet who haid his/hers paid for by Cathay
. . . The P2X rating is only valid for 5 years per Hong Kong's authority. . . or just finds some way to circumvent this limitation. . . .The airline underwent some rather illogical cost-cutting measures. They are crewing 2 SOs for some of their long haul flights now![]()
I believe when you have flown professionally long enough, the joy for many of this career is being able to spend time with family and pursue your other interests.MarkyMark90 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 5:27 pm How is it to be a SO/RP... I mean, the joy of flying is to perform takeoff and landing for most of us. Doesn’t it get boring after a while of just “monitoring” the AP, even on a 777 ?
Just my opinion, but I think you should weight in the life experience gained by living abroad and having layovers all over the world a little more - I presume you are young and single as that was the premise of my statement.Dingbatt wrote: ↑Fri Feb 08, 2019 9:08 amI completely disagree. 4 years have gone by for me at Cathay and not going to Jazz was a disastrous mistake. When I was hired, Jazz wouldn't look at me, but now it seems Jazz are recruiting much more. Its far more money at Cathay; but it doesn't go very far in HK. I'm desperately trying to get back to Canada, after a logbook filled with 4 years of SO P2X time which isn't even worth the paper its written on. Plus, if you got hired now you'd be on the new contract.Boreas wrote: ↑Sun Jan 06, 2019 2:57 pm If the choice is between Jazz and Cathay, as it stands right now and assuming your relatively young and single, Cathay wins hands down.
That being said, the geopolitical situation in Asia doesn't have the best outlook. One can easily end up having to "retreat" to Canada after 5 years as an SO at Cathay... without any additional flight experience to show for it...
Everyone can make their own decisions, but there is plenty of info on PPrne for reasons pilots are pouring out of Cathay.
I think you'd be crazy to go as an SO... maybe FO.. if you can manage the time family pressures away from home/family... but why stall your career as an SO without a clear path to advance?bearitus wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2019 7:27 pm Just got the invite for a second officer interview in Hong Kong. Currently am at Jazz looking at an upgrade by years end. Should I go for it or stick with Jazz/AC? I would be bringing my wife and baby along if I got the job and was wondering if the salary would be enough to rent a decent sized space (1000 square feet or so) and live comfortably in a good area of Hong Kong... From most of the stuff I read on Pprune the second officer job doesn't seem worth it and direct entry FO jobs at Cathay require substantial jet time which I don't have.
Thanks for the advice! I think you are right. My only motivation to go to Cathay was the AC starting pay for the first several years with a family to provide for but hopefully I can make it work out.altiplano wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2019 8:37 pmI think you'd be crazy to go as an SO... maybe FO.. if you can manage the time family pressures away from home/family... but why stall your career as an SO without a clear path to advance?bearitus wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2019 7:27 pm Just got the invite for a second officer interview in Hong Kong. Currently am at Jazz looking at an upgrade by years end. Should I go for it or stick with Jazz/AC? I would be bringing my wife and baby along if I got the job and was wondering if the salary would be enough to rent a decent sized space (1000 square feet or so) and live comfortably in a good area of Hong Kong... From most of the stuff I read on Pprune the second officer job doesn't seem worth it and direct entry FO jobs at Cathay require substantial jet time which I don't have.
You're at Jazz - which really is a pretty good job - close to an upgrade, high probability of AC in a short time...
8-10 year plus Cathay FOs are coming home and joining AC every month right now if that's any indication... they are making a pile more then an SO starting out too...
Hong Kong would be a good experience... but not a good career move from what it sounds for you IMO...