notwhoyouthinkIam wrote: ↑Sun Jul 11, 2021 4:57 pm
altiplano wrote: ↑Sun Jul 11, 2021 4:37 pm
Wow... top notch.
You said:
You are trying to reject the fact that 95% of COVID cases in Ontario are coming from 50% of the population who overwhelmingly have one thing in common; being unvaccinated or partially vaccinated.
Not exactly, I'm trying to discuss that claim... I did point out that your 95% number is inaccurate at this moment in time and there's more to it, and the fact that even if it was accurate, 95% of 95% less people is still a number that is decreasing rapidly.
I also posited that perhaps the communities where covid cases are highest, even pre-vaccine - service industry, immigrant communities - are also the communities least likely to be vaccinated. It would be nice to have a better look at those numbers from the community. So perhaps a correlation not relating 100% to causation... If a particular community already made up majority of covid cases, and that same community is least likely to be vaccinated, and they still make up the majority of cases... well... maybe lack of vaccine isn't necessarily the reason...
I'm trying to discuss that.
72.7% in Waterloo region
https://kitchener.ctvnews.ca/most-new-c ... -1.5503378
Non-specific, but sounds like over the last 3-4 months.
95% in Niagara region
https://www.stcatharinesstandard.ca/new ... cases.html
Since December.
83% across Ontario
https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/202 ... uly-6.html
Difficult article to read... what's recent?
And as someone who is doing vaccine bookings for the province, I can tell you that the majority of bookings I have done have been for people who have heavy accents and live. Mind you, I only get phone calls, so I cannot attest to the numbers coming in through the online portals, pharmacies, or popups.
"At this moment in time."
Statistics are funny things... particularly wwith changing variables.
Over these time periods the majority of people weren't vaccinated, vaccine efficacy aside, of course they would represent the majority of infections.
Using numbers like 95% is an inaccurate portrayal of what's happening
now from looking at your chart 2B. The number of vaccinated breakthrough cases relative total number of cases has substantially increased, that's expected because the number of vaccinated people has risen, during that time we've seen the total number of new cases fall substantially, and we've seen a huge drop in unvaccinated case numbers, and huge drop off the number of the overall unvaccinated cases relative total case number.
So again, 95 That's not a good number from your own data for a number of statistical reasons - but it makes a good headline. Again, statistics are funny things... find what you want to say and you can angle them to achieve it.
Anyway, that aside, as I said, I think it would be interesting to look deeper at the groups driving the new cases: young people and service industry immigrant groups were driving case numbers before, and they're probably driving case numbers now.
Knowing that these are groups with some of the lowest vaccination rates, I wonder how that affects the numbers?Would higher vaccination rates among this group make a significant difference in that as they are among the highest risk, most exposed groups due to cultural/social/lifestyle situations?