Unvaccinated student pilot

Covid related topics that are connected to travel or the aviation industry.
User avatar
Bede
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4858
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:52 am

Re: Unvaccinated student pilot

Post by Bede »

**** wrote: Sat Jan 22, 2022 12:07 pm Who goes from Harvard to Lakehead?
https://www.tbrhri.ca/scientists/dr-mitchell-albert/

Sorry for the thread drift. The US is a lot different working in academia. If you don't get grants you literally don't get paid. You have to grovel to get some teaching to earn money. Plus, if you don't bring in grant money with the associated overhead that the university gets, the universities start clawing back your lab space continuing the downward spiral. Canada is guaranteed salary + lucrative startup grants and financially it's a no brainer. Loss of prestige is a different story.
---------- ADS -----------
 
imjustlurking
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 700
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2021 9:12 am

Re: Unvaccinated student pilot

Post by imjustlurking »

twa22 wrote: Sun Jan 23, 2022 8:08 am Lol

Please stop talking, you're making a fool of yourself. If a vaccine gives you sterilizing immunity, which therefore protects you from even getting infected, that means you don't get sick... So I don't know what your definition of "sick" is

Also, vaccines are for bacterias too, not just viruses

Seriously, go away, you contribute nothing useful to this forum and many people here have told you to piss off
You are as incredibly rude as you are mistaken.
a substance used to stimulate the production of antibodies and provide immunity against one or several diseases, prepared from the causative agent of a disease, its products, or a synthetic substitute, treated to act as an antigen without inducing the disease.
https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10 ... 3115026742

Nowhere in the definition is there anything about preventing the virus from entering your body or replicating. A vaccine gives your immune system a head start.
---------- ADS -----------
 
twa22
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 525
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: Unvaccinated student pilot

Post by twa22 »

imjustlurking wrote: Sun Jan 23, 2022 7:38 pm
twa22 wrote: Sun Jan 23, 2022 8:08 am Lol

Please stop talking, you're making a fool of yourself. If a vaccine gives you sterilizing immunity, which therefore protects you from even getting infected, that means you don't get sick... So I don't know what your definition of "sick" is

Also, vaccines are for bacterias too, not just viruses

Seriously, go away, you contribute nothing useful to this forum and many people here have told you to piss off
You are as incredibly rude as you are mistaken.
a substance used to stimulate the production of antibodies and provide immunity against one or several diseases, prepared from the causative agent of a disease, its products, or a synthetic substitute, treated to act as an antigen without inducing the disease.
https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10 ... 3115026742

Nowhere in the definition is there anything about preventing the virus from entering your body or replicating. A vaccine gives your immune system a head start.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanc ... 9/fulltext

"Vaccines act by two broad main mechanisms. They can block infection occurring entirely or they can halt the progression to symptoms after infection occurs.1"

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7058279/

"Vaccines vary in their protective properties [1,2], and although some completely block infection, others only prevent disease symptoms but not infection or onward transmission."

I'm done, like I said, please stop spreading BS and please don't give oxford english dictionary definitions for medical terms
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
PilotDAR
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4113
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 6:46 pm
Location: Near CNJ4 Orillia, Ontario

Re: Unvaccinated student pilot

Post by PilotDAR »

In the first couple of posts to answer the "friend's" question, the best answers possible were given! Nothing since then has been about airplanes, nor piloting. If you want to talk about vaccines, please do it somewhere else, this place is about aviation! Our society has been disrupted enough by this tempest in a teacup, without inflicting more useless emotion where it is not needed.

If you chose to be vaccinated, that's your choice, if you chose not to be, that's your choice. If you would honestly like to know what another person thinks of your choices, ask that person - NOT EVERYONE!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Big Pistons Forever
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5957
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: West Coast

Re: Unvaccinated student pilot

Post by Big Pistons Forever »

tsgarp wrote: Tue Jan 18, 2022 3:03 pm
Dragon1969 wrote: Tue Jan 18, 2022 8:06 am Hello,

Just asking for a friend who is wondering whether the government vaccination mandate also applies to a not fully vaccinated student pilot flying with a free lance flight instructor on their own private airplane.

thanks in advance
If the instructor is happy and the student is happy, carry on. One minor potential future glitch might be finding an examiner willing to go with an unvaxed candidate.
This examiner won’t do a flight test on anybody not fully vaccinated and all the ones I know won’t either.

Any instructor that has a desire to fly commercially outside of instructing will also be vaccinated so I would suggest that most will take a pass. In any case the pool of instructors who would be willing to fly with this student pilots in their own airplane is already pretty small as most won’t be interested, especially the ones who work at an FTU.

From a practical standpoint wanting to learn on your own airplane as an un-vaxed student is going to make it that much harder to find instruction
---------- ADS -----------
 
DanWEC
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2598
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 1:05 pm
Location: 404

Re: Unvaccinated student pilot

Post by DanWEC »

BPF, what is your rationale for refusing a test to an unvaccinated student?

The choice is yours of course, I'm just genuinely curious what criteria you see as a concern for you. No argument, just always like to hear different people's perspectives.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Big Pistons Forever
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5957
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: West Coast

Re: Unvaccinated student pilot

Post by Big Pistons Forever »

DanWEC wrote: Sun Jan 23, 2022 10:42 pm BPF, what is your rationale for refusing a test to an unvaccinated student?

The choice is yours of course, I'm just genuinely curious what criteria you see as a concern for you. No argument, just always like to hear different people's perspectives.
A couple of reasons for not wanting to spend 1.5 hours 6 inches from someone in a poorly ventilated GA airplane cockpit.

1) There is now significant evidence that unvaccinated people are more infectious if they have COVID-19 over people who are fully vaccinated. My status as a fully vaccinated person with a booster makes it less likely I will get sick enough to be hospitalized if infected but won't necessarily fully protect me from infection. However vaccination does offers some protection from infection so I don't want to fly with someone who is more likely to be infected and more infectious if infected.

2) Unvaccinated people are the reason why the health care system is stretched to the breaking point and why many people are being denied important surgeries, so I see no reason why I should support your choice not to take a approved free vaccine. With choices comes consequences.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Vaticinator
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 222
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2021 11:29 am

Re: Unvaccinated student pilot

Post by Vaticinator »

So, you feel so strongly that the vaccine efficacy is not sufficient enough to keep you safe that you are unwilling to share the same space as an unvaccinated person (who may or may not be infected) but you simultaneously feel so strongly that the vaccines are so effective that everyone should be vaccinated and those that aren't are worthy of your personal punitive measures? With all due respect, that seems hypocritical. How do you reconcile these two points? If I were to express the exact same sentiment as your first point, but followed it up with, "Therefore I don't feel it's ethical to mandate their uptake," I would be labelled an anti-vaxxer.
---------- ADS -----------
 
WellThatAgedWell
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 467
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2022 7:38 am

Re: Unvaccinated student pilot

Post by WellThatAgedWell »

Vaticinator wrote: Tue Jan 25, 2022 10:38 pm So, you feel so strongly that the vaccine efficacy is not sufficient enough to keep you safe that you are unwilling to share the same space as an unvaccinated person (who may or may not be infected) but you simultaneously feel so strongly that the vaccines are so effective that everyone should be vaccinated and those that aren't are worthy of your personal punitive measures? With all due respect, that seems hypocritical. How do you reconcile these two points? If I were to express the exact same sentiment as your first point, but followed it up with, "Therefore I don't feel it's ethical to mandate their uptake," I would be labelled an anti-vaxxer.
I just wonder for how long will people act like this for. In 10 years Covid will be the same thing. Will people keep testing and masking for the next decade?

Omicron is being described by the experts as flu or cold like. We have flu and cold spread every year.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Two years of posts that aged like a fine cheddar.
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: Unvaccinated student pilot

Post by photofly »

Vaticinator wrote: Tue Jan 25, 2022 10:38 pm So, you feel so strongly that the vaccine efficacy is not sufficient enough to keep you safe that you are unwilling to share the same space as an unvaccinated person (who may or may not be infected) but you simultaneously feel so strongly that the vaccines are so effective that everyone should be vaccinated and those that aren't are worthy of your personal punitive measures? With all due respect, that seems hypocritical. How do you reconcile these two points? If I were to express the exact same sentiment as your first point, but followed it up with, "Therefore I don't feel it's ethical to mandate their uptake," I would be labelled an anti-vaxxer.
There you go again with your bogus “if a vaccine isn’t everything it must be nothing”.
---------- ADS -----------
 
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
hamstandard
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 161
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 11:33 am

Re: Unvaccinated student pilot

Post by hamstandard »

Vaticinator wrote: Tue Jan 25, 2022 10:38 pm So, you feel so strongly that the vaccine efficacy is not sufficient enough to keep you safe that you are unwilling to share the same space as an unvaccinated person (who may or may not be infected) but you simultaneously feel so strongly that the vaccines are so effective that everyone should be vaccinated and those that aren't are worthy of your personal punitive measures? With all due respect, that seems hypocritical. How do you reconcile these two points? If I were to express the exact same sentiment as your first point, but followed it up with, "Therefore I don't feel it's ethical to mandate their uptake," I would be labelled an anti-vaxxer.
Becoming almost like modern day lepers. But with the advantage of being able to rejoin society on short notice.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leper_colony
---------- ADS -----------
 
Vaticinator
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 222
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2021 11:29 am

Re: Unvaccinated student pilot

Post by Vaticinator »

photofly wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 5:00 am There you go again with your bogus “if a vaccine isn’t everything it must be nothing”.
:smt015
I actually feel the same way as BPF and I would refuse to share the same confined space IF I knew the person was covid positive or had reason to suspect that they were. Clearly we both share this feeling because we don't trust the vaccine to keep us from getting sick, even though if we were at risk of a serious outcome (which I don't believe myself to be; perhaps BPF does), it would reduce that risk to a degree. However, I would demonstrate MORE faith in the vaccine because I would not have a problem sharing a space with an unvaccinated person as long as they were being responsible and not feeling ill. I'm healthy and vaccinated - they're not ill - what's the problem? Where our opinions diverge is in the ethics of imposing our personal beliefs on others. And that's ALL it takes to get labelled as anti vax by you and the rest of your congregation. And you say my thinking is everything or nothing. :roll:
---------- ADS -----------
 
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: Unvaccinated student pilot

Post by photofly »

It’s not personal beliefs that are being imposed. Nobody is forcing anyone to believe or disbelieve anything. That you are still free to write what you write should be proof enough of that.

It’s behaviours (more accurately, restrictions on behaviours) that are being imposed.

There has, forever, been imposition of behaviours based on medical status in Canadian society: try going to school without regular vaccinations. Or walking around with a raging tuberculosis infection.

You can argue that current restrictions are overdone, or underdone, but the ethics issue was settled decades ago.
---------- ADS -----------
 
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
Vaticinator
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 222
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2021 11:29 am

Re: Unvaccinated student pilot

Post by Vaticinator »

photofly wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 6:50 am the ethics issue was settled decades ago.
Ahhh yes, the fall back of the Covidian: the numbers are in, the issue is settled and there can be no debate.

Nonsense. Decades ago there were no coronaviruses with this particular combination of highly transmissible, yet not terribly deadly, and no fast-waning mRNA vaccines devoid of long term safety data, and no comparable capacity to spread them across the entire globe within weeks. Unless you don't believe in nuance and context, this issue is very new, and very unsettled. There is no apples to apples precedent.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/pandem ... -1.6319844
The pandemic has triggered a new debate over what used to be a settled principle of bioethics — that you don't treat patients differently based on past behaviour that may have contributed to their condition.
If this issue were settled, why are your fellow zealots suggesting that the unvaxxed should pay their own medical bills in our socialized system, or worse yet, that they should be left without necessary care altogether? Why are brainwashed little kids being cheered on French TV programs in Quebec for regurgitating the notions that they should call the police on the unvaccinated and that the unvaccinated need to be marginalized into submission? None of this seems very settled to me.
---------- ADS -----------
 
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: Unvaccinated student pilot

Post by photofly »

Vaticinator wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 8:43 am
photofly wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 6:50 am the ethics issue was settled decades ago.
Ahhh yes, the fall back of the Covidian: the numbers are in, the issue is settled and there can be no debate.
I didn't say there' can be no debate. But you can't pretend that the issue of restricting people's actions based on medical issues is somehow new, or that we have no precedents. The ethics issue was settled decades ago. You can re-open it, if you want to - claim new and special circumstances - but recognize that's what you're doing.

I believe strongly in nuance and context. Which is my main objection to your "if a vaccine isn't everything it must be nothing" theme. I'm happy to consider that vaccine mandates may have gone too far, or not far enough, or are applied wrongly. I don't believe the concept of restricting people's behaviour is de-facto unethical though.

Let's go back to your comment "Where our opinions diverge is in the ethics of imposing our personal beliefs on others."

As I said, nobody is imposing any beliefs on anyone else, and you're proof of that. You can and will believe what you want. And there is no generic ethical issue of imposing restrictions on people in present circumstances. The details, I'm happy to debate. Obviously.
---------- ADS -----------
 
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
Vaticinator
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 222
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2021 11:29 am

Re: Unvaccinated student pilot

Post by Vaticinator »

photofly wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:15 am As I said, nobody is imposing any beliefs on anyone else
In the hypothetical situation that was being discussed, that was exactly what was proposed. A person denying another person a service, in part, as a punishment for their personal choice. They're well within their rights to do so, but that's exactly what's happening.
---------- ADS -----------
 
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: Unvaccinated student pilot

Post by photofly »

Vaticinator wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:49 am
photofly wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:15 am As I said, nobody is imposing any beliefs on anyone else
In the hypothetical situation that was being discussed, that was exactly what was proposed. A person denying another person a service, in part, as a punishment for their personal choice. They're well within their rights to do so, but that's exactly what's happening.
Something is getting lost here. Nobody is being punished for what they do or don't believe. They're being "punished" (I adopt your word without endorsing it) for how they behave. Specifically, for getting or not getting a vaccine - not for believing anything about a vaccine. I don't, in general, see a problem with that.
---------- ADS -----------
 
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
Vaticinator
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 222
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2021 11:29 am

Re: Unvaccinated student pilot

Post by Vaticinator »

What do you suppose directs a person's actions? Throwing darts at a board? Spinning a wheel of possibilities?
---------- ADS -----------
 
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: Unvaccinated student pilot

Post by photofly »

Your argument, that everyone should be free to follow their personal beliefs in all respects, is absurd. I don't believe in property rights - ergo I should be free to steal from you. I don't believe in driving on the correct side of the road - ergo I should be free to drive as I please. I don't believe in vaccinations, ergo I demand to be free from consequence if I go without. There's no real difference.

Curiously, the fields where we, exceptionally, do allow exemptions to expected behaviour on the basis of personal belief, is in religion. Members of the SIkh religion don't have to wear motorcycle helmets. Observant Jews don't have to remove their yarmulkes in court. Yet you are the person who likes to accuse others of treating vaccination as a religious belief. You should try arguing that from the other end, and you'd have a credible case for not restricting services to people who refuse a vaccine.
---------- ADS -----------
 
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
Vaticinator
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 222
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2021 11:29 am

Re: Unvaccinated student pilot

Post by Vaticinator »

photofly wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 10:05 am Your argument, that everyone should be free to follow their personal beliefs in all respects, is absurd.
That would be absurd, wouldn't it. Fortunately I've never said that and that is not my argument, in spite of your repeated duplicitous attempts to intentionally characterize it as such.
---------- ADS -----------
 
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: Unvaccinated student pilot

Post by photofly »

Vaticinator wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 10:20 am
photofly wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 10:05 am Your argument, that everyone should be free to follow their personal beliefs in all respects, is absurd.
That would be absurd, wouldn't it. Fortunately I've never said that and that is not my argument, in spite of your repeated duplicitous attempts to intentionally characterize it as such.
I'm not being duplicitious; I genuinely don't see the difference.

In which respects should people be free to act on their personal beliefs without negative consequence, and in which respects should they not?
Why is a negative outcome to refusing a vaccine different to a negative outcome to refusing to drive correctly? What are the criteria a just society can use for demanding a certain behaviour from someone?
---------- ADS -----------
 
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
DanWEC
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2598
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 1:05 pm
Location: 404

Re: Unvaccinated student pilot

Post by DanWEC »

Big Pistons Forever wrote: Tue Jan 25, 2022 6:50 pm A couple of reasons for not wanting to spend 1.5 hours 6 inches from someone in a poorly ventilated GA airplane cockpit.

1) There is now significant evidence that unvaccinated people are more infectious if they have COVID-19 over people who are fully vaccinated. My status as a fully vaccinated person with a booster makes it less likely I will get sick enough to be hospitalized if infected but won't necessarily fully protect me from infection. However vaccination does offers some protection from infection so I don't want to fly with someone who is more likely to be infected and more infectious if infected.

2) Unvaccinated people are the reason why the health care system is stretched to the breaking point and why many people are being denied important surgeries, so I see no reason why I should support your choice not to take a approved free vaccine. With choices comes consequences.
BPF, to cut through some of the conversation here and just reply to you:

I presumed your reasoning would be for an element of self risk, and that would have been valid a year ago, but if I can allay your concerns a bit with recent 2022 data.

To your first point- Elevated risk of transmission. The fact of the matter with Omicron as the 90%+ dominant strain is that the dynamic of vaccine methodology is adapting, since it is almost a completely different virus and subsequent disease from Delta. The current vaccines are being shown to have almost zero effect on transmission. (Again, not talking about 1 or 2 years ago, or Delta). I would welcome to be proven wrong, but there is just no evidence to the contrary. It's a fact, and it's the entire reason the cases have absolutely skyrocketed- it's irrefutable.
Omicron has a totally different pathology than Delta, it quickly affects the shallow throat mucosae as opposed to deep pulmonary tissue. It infects and fully presents in less than 3 days, and multiplies to a contagious load so quickly that the vaccine-enhanced T-cells are behind. There's no away around that. It's acting much more like the common cold or flu. Actually, there were vaccines attempted in the 80's and 90's that expressed enhanced B and T cells in throat mucosae, but their efficacy is so short lived due to the mutational nature of corona viruses that they're mostly abandoned due to economics.
(Luckily, with strains like Delta, the deep infection and long incubation period is one of the factors that limits its transmissibility and spread.)

Now, there is still logical evidence that, in the case that an individual has a high viral load and is fully symptomatic with a bad bout of Omicron, that vaccination will reduce the contagious period by a day or two and of course lessen the symptoms, but if some moronic student gets into a plane with me with a full out cold the only thing they'll get that day is a serious talk on decision making. So, as you can see, there is all but zero difference in risk to yourself, currently, by sitting next to a non-symptomatic person whether they're vaccinated or not.
For the second point, well, that one has been beat to death. 74% of cases in hospitals today in Ontario are omicron positive, yes, another 20% uptake would make a difference, but I'll just leave that there. It's a health care systemic issue.
Anyhow, I'm fully vaccinated, I actually worked in a production lab around 2000 making various tablets. The product and science is amazing, and good for it's target, (Which is 2 years old now.... part of the problem.) but I also believe as a population we also can't resolve to getting shots every 6 months to replace our immune systems or take advice from CEO's.

Anyhow, everyone should do whatever they want to protect themselves, but the data and subsequent methodology to base those decisions on is changing rapidly. It's essentially a prophylactic now and doesn't much change transmission.

Cheers,
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by DanWEC on Wed Jan 26, 2022 12:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Vaticinator
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 222
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2021 11:29 am

Re: Unvaccinated student pilot

Post by Vaticinator »

photofly wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 10:32 am Your argument, that everyone should be free to follow their personal beliefs in all respects
...
I'm not being duplicitious; I genuinely don't see the difference.
You most certainly are being duplicitous. Sorry, but I'm not taking your bait. It's rotten as usual. I can tell that you want to have your straw man fun, but I'm not interested in being intentionally misrepresented. If you genuinely don't see the difference, then you have a comprehension issue.
---------- ADS -----------
 
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: Unvaccinated student pilot

Post by photofly »

Vaticinator wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 12:57 pm
photofly wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 10:32 am Your argument, that everyone should be free to follow their personal beliefs in all respects
...
I'm not being duplicitious; I genuinely don't see the difference.
You most certainly are being duplicitous. Sorry, but I'm not taking your bait. It's rotten as usual. I can tell that you want to have your straw man fun, but I'm not interested in being intentionally misrepresented. If you genuinely don't see the difference, then you have a comprehension issue.
I'm not trying to misrepresent you, but to the extent that I understand your argument it seems absurd.

You said "Where our opinions diverge is in the ethics of imposing our personal beliefs on others." I don't think our opinions diverge on this point. Nobody is imposing any belief on you. You are free to believe what you want - the same as me, or different to me. No imposition of belief whatsoever.
---------- ADS -----------
 
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
Posthumane
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 651
Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 6:16 pm

Re: Unvaccinated student pilot

Post by Posthumane »

DanWEC wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 11:41 am The fact of the matter with Omicron as the 90%+ dominant strain is that the dynamic of vaccine methodology is adapting, since it is almost a completely different virus and subsequent disease from Delta. The current vaccines are being shown to have almost zero effect on transmission. (Again, not talking about 1 or 2 years ago, or Delta).
An interesting point to note is that while the number of reported omicron cases has skyrocketed, the number of delta cases has only decreased a bit; it's far from gone at the moment. The number or cases being found per day at the peak of the current wave in Canada was about 10x what the peak of the last delta wave had, so with somewhere around 6.5% of those being delta in the latest update in January the number of delta cases around the country is about 2/3 of what it was before omicron got a hold here.
---------- ADS -----------
 
"People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it." -George Bernard Shaw
Post Reply

Return to “Covid”