It is exactly like a police checkstop for the air. If you challenge the officer they will just keep you there longer and look that much harder for something you're doing wrong.
I think that the real issues have been beaten to death.
1. It is not exactly like a check stop at all......
and
2. If I understand your post, if you challange the "officer, which they are not", they will just keep looking.....
I think that clearly means that there is an implied threat in excersing your rights. It is intimidation if you believe that in asserting your rights you have something to fear.
Sad, that so many people here are so willing to forgo their basic rights. It is a matter of the rights that the charter of rights and freedoms gives us.
As to the police becoming involved. If the answer to your question that the inspector has no reason to believe you have broken any laws is in the negative, I dont think you have much to fear from the police. They actually understand your rights, although they may try the old "why do you mind if you have nothing to hide" You answer should be simply that my rights to random search detention are protected by the Charter and the inspector said he had no cause to believe I had broken any laws.





