snoopy wrote:It's not what he has thrown away, it is what he may have done to other human beings that is unfathomable.
Kirsten B.
Fully agree with you as it seems his actions have escalated to invole the tragic murder of these two women.
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog
snoopy wrote:It's not what he has thrown away, it is what he may have done to other human beings that is unfathomable.
Kirsten B.

I don't imagine officers are all that popular with the other military prisoners, either.shitdisturber wrote: Either way, if convicted this guy faces a lot of unpleasant time. When he's finally turned over to the federal prison system; he's looking at spending the rest of his sentence in segregation since rapist/murderers aren't hugely popular with other prisoners. Neither are cops/soldiers.
If only this were true. I think we'd all like to believe in the inviolability of certain positions, like military officers, cops, firemen, hell even pilots, I guess, but we know it's not true.flightlead wrote:For the sake of right vs wrong .... this man is innocent until proven guilty . I find it hard to believe a well rounded, respectful Colonel in the Canadian Forces, is capable of such evil acts. If the evidence is hand's down strong, I hope that he ultimately gets what he deserves.
I doubt this very much. Unless the incident happened on base, the MPs would not get involved with cadets. As far as the youth are concerned, it's a CIVILIAN volunteer organisation. The only members held accountable to the DND are the officers (who hold commissions).Meatservo wrote:I vaguely recall an incident some years ago, a couple of high school students who also happened to be Air Cadets were involved in some kind of dickens at their school, either making a bomb threat or bringing some kind of firearms to the school. Anyway, what I remember about the whole thing is that the news reported that the Military Police were the first people to pay these young fellas a visit...


Isis wrote:I doubt this very much. Unless the incident happened on base, the MPs would not get involved with cadets. As far as the youth are concerned, it's a CIVILIAN volunteer organisation. The only members held accountable to the DND are the officers (who hold commissions).Meatservo wrote:I vaguely recall an incident some years ago, a couple of high school students who also happened to be Air Cadets were involved in some kind of dickens at their school, either making a bomb threat or bringing some kind of firearms to the school. Anyway, what I remember about the whole thing is that the news reported that the Military Police were the first people to pay these young fellas a visit...
So unless it was thought that their officers were somehow involved, the MPs wouldn't have even known about it, let alone got involved.
This is quite the shocking case. Like snoopy, I too fear what other acts this man may have gotten away with.

I think you're wrong there. Since the first person he is alleged to have killed was a Cpl serving at Trenton I think the military will get to try him first. A far better fate in my book since he'd end up doing his two years in Edmonton first before being sent off to the far easier federal prison system.kevenv wrote:I served 15 years in the military. The maximum sentence in a military prison is 2 years. After that you are dishonorably discharged from the Forces and transferred to a civilian prison to serve the remainder or until paroled. This is what happened to Kyle Brown (remember the airborne?)
The Col will not be tried in a military court. The offenses do not involve the military. He was charged by the OPP for crimes that the OPP were investigating. For sure they will have contact with the military police and the JAG but DND has no control or jurisdiction over the proceedings. His lawyer at trial will be a civilian. He may well (probably will) have contact with a military lawyer during the trial whose job is to keep an eye on the proceedings as well as to provide advice if requested.
He will in all likelihood be carried as a member of the CF until such time as (If) he is found guilty. He would then be discharged from the forces and serve his sentence in civilian prison.
So, our killer outranks their killer! Take THAT, Yanks!Meatservo wrote:This on the heels of the American major murdering soldiers in Texas, is quite upsetting.
Death penalty under the NDA was removed during the revamp of the Act in the 90's.C-GGGQ wrote:So not even the canadian military still has the death penalty?
I'd be willing to lend him my Kimber......and one bullet.MrWings wrote: Just out of pure speculation, would you say that this guy is more likely to commit suicide? You know, honorable soldier disgraced going out in style. Maybe I've watched A Few Good Men too many times.

Isis wrote:I doubt this very much. Unless the incident happened on base, the MPs would not get involved with cadets. As far as the youth are concerned, it's a CIVILIAN volunteer organisation. The only members held accountable to the DND are the officers (who hold commissions).Meatservo wrote:I vaguely recall an incident some years ago, a couple of high school students who also happened to be Air Cadets were involved in some kind of dickens at their school, either making a bomb threat or bringing some kind of firearms to the school. Anyway, what I remember about the whole thing is that the news reported that the Military Police were the first people to pay these young fellas a visit...
So unless it was thought that their officers were somehow involved, the MPs wouldn't have even known about it, let alone got involved.
This is quite the shocking case. Like snoopy, I too fear what other acts this man may have gotten away with.
Military police laid charges of sexual assault and common assault against Basil Williams and a charge of sexual assault against Christopher Plummer, both members of 2754 Royal Canadian Army Cadet Corps, of Toronto.
The cadets, both 18, were charged under section 271 of the Criminal Code that covers unwanted sexual advances and touching as a result of an incident involving a female army cadet under 18 in late June at the cadet summer training centre. They are to appear in Barrie Provincial Court Aug. 5.
The investigation service said yesterday one charge of sexual assault was laid against Master-Warrant Officer Roy Young, 46, relating to incidents alleged by a civilian female secretary to have occurred between April and June at the camp. Young is to appear in court in Barrie on Aug. 12.

Note the reference to cadets. Now back to the tragic story at hand.WHAT THEY DO
Military Police with the Canadian Forces (CF) serve a community of 200,000 Regular and Reserve Force members, Department of National Defence (DND) civilian employees, cadets, and family members residing on military establishments in Canada and abroad. Whether at home on CF bases or abroad on international missions, Military Police, in conjunction with civilian and allied military police forces, protect and support all components of the CF. With over 1,250 full-time members, they form one of the largest police forces in Canada.
The international scope of the CF requires that Military Police provide services in Canada and around the world. All Canadian citizens are entitled to the same rights, privileges and protection under Canadian law, and Military Police are qualified to provide these services to the same standard as every other Canadian police service. Military Police routinely function within the civilian criminal and military justice systems, and are recognised as peace officers in the Criminal Code of Canada.
Specific tasks of Military Police may include:
Supporting CF missions around the world, by providing policing and operational support
Enforcing provincial and federal laws and regulations on DND establishments
Investigating and reporting incidents involving military and/or criminal offences
Performing other policing duties, such as traffic control, traffic-accident investigation, emergency response, and liaison with Canadian, allied and other foreign police forces
Developing and applying crime prevention measures to protect military communities against criminal acts
Coordinating tasks related to persons held in custody (including military detainees and prisoners of war)
Providing security at selected Canadian embassies around the world
Providing service to the community through conflict mediation, negotiation, dispute resolution, public relations and victim assistance
I beg to differ. The following is an excerpt from a report on the Somalia affair a number of years ago.shitdisturber wrote:I think you're wrong there. Since the first person he is alleged to have killed was a Cpl serving at Trenton I think the military will get to try him first. A far better fate in my book since he'd end up doing his two years in Edmonton first before being sent off to the far easier federal prison system.kevenv wrote:I served 15 years in the military. The maximum sentence in a military prison is 2 years. After that you are dishonorably discharged from the Forces and transferred to a civilian prison to serve the remainder or until paroled. This is what happened to Kyle Brown (remember the airborne?)
The Col will not be tried in a military court. The offenses do not involve the military. He was charged by the OPP for crimes that the OPP were investigating. For sure they will have contact with the military police and the JAG but DND has no control or jurisdiction over the proceedings. His lawyer at trial will be a civilian. He may well (probably will) have contact with a military lawyer during the trial whose job is to keep an eye on the proceedings as well as to provide advice if requested.
He will in all likelihood be carried as a member of the CF until such time as (If) he is found guilty. He would then be discharged from the forces and serve his sentence in civilian prison.
Meatservo, in answer to your question; it doesn't really matter if any prisoners from the ranks like him or not. In CFDB or whatever they're calling it now all aspects of a prisoner's day is strictly controlled; including interaction with other prisoners. For example, a guy I knew did some time there and he told me even speaking to the guards was a privilege that had to be earned. He's probably considerably safer in military prison than he would be in a federal pen; but in CFDB he'd actually be punished, as opposed to just serving time. Again, going on the assumption that he's convicted.

Ok, so they can't get him for the murders, Cornwallis was a long time ago and I did a memory dump as soon as the bus went through the gates. That being said, the JAG can still get him for any number of charges including "conduct unbecoming" and "abuse of a subordinate" which are two that immediately spring to mind. I know I'd throw everything I could think of at him in order to ensure he spent his first two years in Edmonton. At least there he'd actually pay for the crimes instead of "receiving treatment in order to make him a productive member of society."kevenv wrote:I beg to differ. The following is an excerpt from a report on the Somalia affair a number of years ago.shitdisturber wrote:I think you're wrong there. Since the first person he is alleged to have killed was a Cpl serving at Trenton I think the military will get to try him first. A far better fate in my book since he'd end up doing his two years in Edmonton first before being sent off to the far easier federal prison system.kevenv wrote:I served 15 years in the military. The maximum sentence in a military prison is 2 years. After that you are dishonorably discharged from the Forces and transferred to a civilian prison to serve the remainder or until paroled. This is what happened to Kyle Brown (remember the airborne?)
The Col will not be tried in a military court. The offenses do not involve the military. He was charged by the OPP for crimes that the OPP were investigating. For sure they will have contact with the military police and the JAG but DND has no control or jurisdiction over the proceedings. His lawyer at trial will be a civilian. He may well (probably will) have contact with a military lawyer during the trial whose job is to keep an eye on the proceedings as well as to provide advice if requested.
He will in all likelihood be carried as a member of the CF until such time as (If) he is found guilty. He would then be discharged from the forces and serve his sentence in civilian prison.
Meatservo, in answer to your question; it doesn't really matter if any prisoners from the ranks like him or not. In CFDB or whatever they're calling it now all aspects of a prisoner's day is strictly controlled; including interaction with other prisoners. For example, a guy I knew did some time there and he told me even speaking to the guards was a privilege that had to be earned. He's probably considerably safer in military prison than he would be in a federal pen; but in CFDB he'd actually be punished, as opposed to just serving time. Again, going on the assumption that he's convicted.
"Under the Code of Service Discipline all service offences committed outside Canada and most committed in Canada can be tried by service tribunals. The only exceptions are certain offences committed in Canada -- murder, manslaughter, certain sexual offences, and abduction offences under sections 280-283 of the Criminal Code.49 These can be tried only by civil courts."

As far as I know, Paul Bernardo spends 23+ hours a day in solitary with plexiglass on his door so nobody can throw stuff at him and he can't throw anything at anybody.At least there he'd actually pay for the crimes instead of "receiving treatment in order to make him a productive member of society."

[Assuming guilty as charged.] What honour? Once these crimes were committed, there was no honour present at all. Suicide is allowing him an easy way out.MrWings wrote: Just out of pure speculation, would you say that this guy is more likely to commit suicide? You know, honorable soldier disgraced going out in style. Maybe I've watched A Few Good Men too many times.