You didn't use the word "predominately", you used the word "predominant" and the way you used the word "predominant" suggests that the Oklahoma City bombing was not a "predominant" terrorist act. 2 very different meanings on this subject.ravensrule wrote:I figured someone would bring up McVeigh, which is always why I added the word 'predominately.' Sure Arabs aren't going to be the end all-be all of terrorists, but there is certainly a trend going with recent attempts...
Martin....I don't think you hate to be technical, its part of being on the boards and busting each others chops, but maybe you should go back and read my first point just above and you should re-read the post by Raven...technically, you are wrong.Martin Tamme wrote:cdnpilot77 wrote:2nd worst terrorist act in North America...and was first prior to 9/11
I hate to be technical, but you have to read the fine print:
ravensrule wrote:If you look at the last 15 years...
Oklahoma City Bombing happened April 19th, 1995. Hence, more than 15 years.
As for the date, it's closer to 15yrs ago than....shit....can't think of an analogy, but it's pretty damn close!