bmc wrote: The next thing they should do is introduce a gun registry because it also reduces crime, as proven in Canada.
Is that meant to be sarcasm? Please clarify.
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore
bmc wrote: The next thing they should do is introduce a gun registry because it also reduces crime, as proven in Canada.
Full throttle on the sarcasm.Northern Skies wrote:bmc wrote: The next thing they should do is introduce a gun registry because it also reduces crime, as proven in Canada.
Is that meant to be sarcasm? Please clarify.
bmc wrote: Full throttle on the sarcasm.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110213/ap_ ... earms_voteDoctors, churches and women's groups tried and failed Sunday to require military-issued firearms to be locked in secure army depots. They also wanted the Swiss government to establish a national gun registry and ban the sale of fully automatic weapons and pump-action rifles, arguing this would help cut incidents of domestic violence and Switzerland's high rate of firearms suicides.
The clear defeat of the proposal — 56.3 percent of voters rejected it — may seem surprising for a peaceful nation that hasn't been at war with its neighbors since Napoleon invaded two centuries ago. But this is a country that cherishes the myth of William Tell and its soldiers' supposed defiance of Nazi Germany in World War II.
Yeah, I was following the story. It was a few whose huge egos enabled them to preach that their simplistic solution to a non-existent problem would justify undermining the liberty of swiss citizens as well as the strategy of Switzerland's sovereignty.JakeYYZ wrote:Northern Skies, they did try to impose a gun registry , Feb 12,2011. The Swiss have direct democracy. Something we in Canada desperately need.
so you want to change the Canadian system to be like that of a foreign nation? Just like the people you "rebel" against. Maybe you need to adapt to our system? Or get out. Either way is fine with me.
Punitive as in they don't do a damn thing other than satisify the jack boot crowd. Prohibiting the construction of minerets is a perfect example. No more minerets. Currently four in the country. Despite the fact that there are over 200 mosques.JakeYYZ wrote:Gee bmc, you're a beacon of light and a font of wisdom in these dark days. Can you expand on this: “punitive measures”?
You mean the Swiss nationalist crowd, don’t you?bmc wrote:Punitive as in they don't do a damn thing other than satisify the jack boot crowd.JakeYYZ wrote:Gee bmc, you're a beacon of light and a font of wisdom in these dark days. Can you expand on this: “punitive measures”?
So, do you think that Hitler may have been on to something?JakeYYZ wrote:You mean the Swiss nationalist crowd, don’t you?bmc wrote:Punitive as in they don't do a damn thing other than satisify the jack boot crowd.JakeYYZ wrote:Gee bmc, you're a beacon of light and a font of wisdom in these dark days. Can you expand on this: “punitive measures”?
Stupid white liberals continue to think in terms of: white nationalism = racism/imperialism/oppression AND non-white nationalism = resistance/reclamation of lost identity/liberation. For most white liberals, 'white nationalism' conjures up images of Hitler, WWII, and white oppression of non-whites while 'non-white nationalism' conjures up images of Gandhi, Mandela, and Ho Chi Minh. Great horrors were committed in the name of anti-imperialism. Many parts of the world turned far worse after 'liberation', but then liberals, in their clever stupidity, have reasons and excuses for that too.
So, liberals don't think nationalism is always bad. It just depends on the context and colour.
White nationalism: BAD. Non-White nationalism: GOOD.
Shhhhh...you're not supposed to talk about the CBC's Greatest Canadian and eugenics in the same breath.2R wrote:How did that cat get passed the new politically correct eugenics programme that Tommy Douglas wanted instituted in the brave new order of the lefties version of a totalitarian utophian programme of socialist social engineering.
Whoever said the Saskatchewan Socialists did not have the same views as the National Socialists obviously never read Tommy Douglas thesis.
The native population hasn't been asked for their opinion for the last 500 years or so...Should not the native population have a say in what is acceptable behavior and what is not