CARGOJET GOING PUBLIC?
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, North Shore
LOL
I was going to get fished in and write a detailed response to you but it's not worth feeding into a forum troll that makes a crazy comment such as yours without a shed of anything to substanciate your "claim".
How's this...
You're absolutely right. Nothing like something of value for free to really screw ya. Man, the nerve of them!
The company held five percent of the trust units aside to GIVE to the employees all at once. You can sell them tomorrow if you want, hold them and collect the monthly disributible income cheques, whatever you want to do - they're yours. Terrible, terrible thing the company is doing taking advantage of all the employees like that.
Yep, you're totally right, we're getting shafted here! LOL.
For whatever reason you're unhappy with your AME position in Vancouver, don't go slandering other employers simply because of your particular plight (whatever it may be).
Of course anyone in Cargojet that disagrees I'm sure is welcome to turn them down and leave more in the pot for the rest of the group. I don't think management will threaten us to take them... lol
I was going to get fished in and write a detailed response to you but it's not worth feeding into a forum troll that makes a crazy comment such as yours without a shed of anything to substanciate your "claim".
How's this...
You're absolutely right. Nothing like something of value for free to really screw ya. Man, the nerve of them!
The company held five percent of the trust units aside to GIVE to the employees all at once. You can sell them tomorrow if you want, hold them and collect the monthly disributible income cheques, whatever you want to do - they're yours. Terrible, terrible thing the company is doing taking advantage of all the employees like that.
Yep, you're totally right, we're getting shafted here! LOL.
For whatever reason you're unhappy with your AME position in Vancouver, don't go slandering other employers simply because of your particular plight (whatever it may be).
Of course anyone in Cargojet that disagrees I'm sure is welcome to turn them down and leave more in the pot for the rest of the group. I don't think management will threaten us to take them... lol
OK...................................It wasn't ment as slander - just something else to think about. I'm just trying to say there could be more going on than you guys relize.
If thats really the way it's going to work than good for you, It's nice to see something good happening to Canadian companies, and I have nothing against Cargojet - they have done really well and you guys have worked hard. However, I've been in your same spot before - and come out on the short end of the stick later on. Just saying be causious when moving forward.
BTW - I couldn't be more happier with my job right now!
If thats really the way it's going to work than good for you, It's nice to see something good happening to Canadian companies, and I have nothing against Cargojet - they have done really well and you guys have worked hard. However, I've been in your same spot before - and come out on the short end of the stick later on. Just saying be causious when moving forward.
BTW - I couldn't be more happier with my job right now!
-
aero-singidunum
- Rank 4

- Posts: 264
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 10:03 am
Aero no, that's not what I said.
I said the dayliner would revert to the old CJT701/CJT702 dayliner (YHM-YYC-YVR-YYZ), OR another flight would be added to provide to increase the capacity of the overnight network to contain the customers displaced by the elimination of the AC daylight flight. Why would the flight not continue operatings? It was done before by CJT with great success.
It has nothing to do with "balls". CJT formerly operated the dayliner but took it offline when AC requested to charter the current run. When the current run ends CJT will resume offering the services as there will be no dayliner flight by Air Canada to service that product (the reason a portion of that product is onboard is it is not available at night).
The run does not start out of YMX. Only at night does the flight begin in YMX. ACE (when operating for AC) operated ex YYZ while CJT currently operates ex YHM.
Cargodog
I said the dayliner would revert to the old CJT701/CJT702 dayliner (YHM-YYC-YVR-YYZ), OR another flight would be added to provide to increase the capacity of the overnight network to contain the customers displaced by the elimination of the AC daylight flight. Why would the flight not continue operatings? It was done before by CJT with great success.
It has nothing to do with "balls". CJT formerly operated the dayliner but took it offline when AC requested to charter the current run. When the current run ends CJT will resume offering the services as there will be no dayliner flight by Air Canada to service that product (the reason a portion of that product is onboard is it is not available at night).
The run does not start out of YMX. Only at night does the flight begin in YMX. ACE (when operating for AC) operated ex YYZ while CJT currently operates ex YHM.
Cargodog
-
aero-singidunum
- Rank 4

- Posts: 264
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 10:03 am






