"Harper will TRY to claim..." so yes..projected figures.cpl_atc wrote:I am Birddog wrote: Far from the growth figures demonstrating the “sound economic management” as Harper tried to claim under his government...
Huh? Under whose government? You mean his projected figures?
...My personal opinion.
Based on your replies here, you seem to be an intelligent person...I bet you are able judge someone's depth of intelligence just by looking into their eyes..... it is worth noting that Harper's intelligence is well respected by many people. You shouldn't be so quick to dismiss him before he's had a chance to do anything.
When I look at Harper...I see a block of wood. There is nothing in his persona that tells me he is a leader...despite him being a 'good person'. On the morning of the 24th...the press followed him to watch him drop off his kids at school...if anyone else saw this, please speak up.
It was so painful to watch the awkwardness of this man trying to connect with his kids. He was a stranger to them. Who shakes their kids hands at the school yard. He has no connection to his kids...how do you expect him to connect with the rest of the country. At least Mulroney had that.
Like Ernie Eves of the Provincial PC government...he thought he could do it on his own. Martin was so power hungry and greedy and sloppy he got what he deserved.At least he appears as though he'll have the good sense to maintain some priorities and focus, as opposed to Martin, for whom everything under the sun was "very, very important" and "fundamental", and who had 12,000 priorities, many of which were addressed in a half-assed manner by throwing millions at the issue.





