Doctors trying to bring you the truth at great cost to themselves

[JerryRig]

BTW Robert Malone is not the inventor of mRNA vaccines. He did some experiments as a grad student back in the '80's I think. He's been on a self promotion tour claiming he's the inventor. Most people in the field credit Katalin Karinko with overcoming the most significant obstacles in the development of mRNA vaccines paving the way for the rapid roll out that we saw.

Andrew Wakefield had his medical license pulled for repeatedly falsifying data. He's the author of the lovely "MMR vaccine causes autism".

Kary Mullis is a Nobel laureate in chemistry I think. He invented PCR. He brilliant but he's definitely one of the out of the mainstream scientists. I think he spends his time surfing now. I'd at least listen to what he has to say.

Don't know anyone else.

Some people don't have any idea how to research. How do you even check the weather? oh ya, it's handed to you from dispatch....

Kary Mullis is DEAD. Died in 2019, right before covid. Conveniently. So he could not tell us PCR test is a fraud for covid.

Robert Malone: https://www.rwmalonemd.com/rna-vaccine-inventor

[Bede]

Googling is not the same as doing research. (Researchers do research. They do experiments and look at data.) And that part about reliable sources???

I wasn't aware Kary Mullis had died, I'm just going off memory of things I read about them at some point in time. Kind of makes him hard to be against the Covid vaccine if he's dead though, no? Are you alleging he was murdered? Do you have any evidence of that or is this just another baseless conspiracy theory?

Like I said, Robert Malone claims to be the inventor of mRNA vaccines, no one else does though. Self promotion.

[imjustlurking]

Here's a list of various doctors trying to bring you the truth at great cost to themselves. Search for them on uncensored search engines and platforms such as Duck Duck Go, Telegram, Bitchute, Rumble and Odysee.
There are two Nobel Peace Prize winners and one nominee on this list.
NOW GO DO YOUR HOMEWORK!

Dr. Luc Montainger

I don't know which other Nobel price "winner" you are referring to but Prof. Montagnier (The dummy website where you cut and paste this crap couldn't even spell his name correctly)
So yes....Prof. Montagnier became an absolute shame of his former self and a master in absurd pseudoscience!


A laughing example.

I looked up Dr. Kary Mullis (the only winner on that list) and it talks in depth about he denied that HIV was an issue and later, climate change.

I guess it makes sense that he'd get on the "COVID is a plandemic" bandwagon.

[photofly]

I'm still hoping to hear why anyone would expect a Nobel peace prize winner (or for that matter, a winner for literature) has any expertise in biology, immunology or epidemiology.

Anyone know (or care) what Malala thinks about COVID? Or Desmond Tutu? Or want to imagine what Yasser Arafat would have said?

No? Didn't think so.

[rookiepilot]

I'm still hoping to hear why anyone would expect a Nobel peace prize winner (or for that matter, a winner for literature) has any expertise in biology, immunology or epidemiology.

Anyone know (or care) what Malala thinks about COVID? Or Desmond Tutu? Or want to imagine what Yasser Arafat would have said?

No? Didn't think so.

Yeah but pilots are experts on everything, obviously.

[photofly]

I had noticed that!

[Vaticinator]

I'm still hoping to hear why anyone would expect a Nobel peace prize winner (or for that matter, a winner for literature) has any expertise in biology, immunology or epidemiology.

Anyone know (or care) what Malala thinks about COVID? Or Desmond Tutu? Or want to imagine what Yasser Arafat would have said?

No? Didn't think so.

Very true. And yet, here we are, arguing on the internet as though we should be heard because we feel we are absolutely, indisputably correct, so much so that we should be able to force our opinions on to others and their personal choices. Funny that many can agree that a Nobel Prize winner isn't necessarily qualified to speak on this subject, but very, very few have enough perspective to realize the same applies to them.

[Bede]

Yeah but pilots are experts on everything, obviously.

What's the most dangerous thing in a hangar?
A pilot with a screwdriver.

[CYERCaptainPooping]

https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/t ... 0545319182

ZDoggMD response to Joe Rogan interview with Peter McCullough interview.

[photofly]

I'm still hoping to hear why anyone would expect a Nobel peace prize winner (or for that matter, a winner for literature) has any expertise in biology, immunology or epidemiology.

Anyone know (or care) what Malala thinks about COVID? Or Desmond Tutu? Or want to imagine what Yasser Arafat would have said?

No? Didn't think so.

Very true. And yet, here we are, arguing on the internet as though we should be heard because we feel we are absolutely, indisputably correct, so much so that we should be able to force our opinions on to others and their personal choices.

Last time I checked, I hadn’t made any podcasts about COVID, or backed up the claims that I haven’t made with any of the credentials that I have, none of which are relevant in the field of disease or immunology. You might have; I couldn’t say.

Nobody is forced to accept anyone’s opinion, in any sphere, and this thread is prima facie evidence of nobody’s opinion being changed, so attempting to force one person’s opinion on another doesn’t work, even if it were attempted here, which it isn’t.

Those whose expertise does fall in relevant fields, those paid to advise on public health, are advising elected representatives to undertake various public health measures, which you free to (and clearly do) disagree with. That’s not forcing an opinion, it is to a very very limited extent restricting some courses of action. That’s lawful and proper, and if you don’t want to submit to that you’re free to campaign against it, and have the rules changed. Until then, the only thing you’re being forced to do is abide by the same rules as everyone else.

So, to the extent I understand the point you’re trying to make, I can’t see that it’s based in fact.

[Vaticinator]

Sorry, context is hard to convey. I wasn't trying to make a greater point about anything. Just making an observation that piggybacked on your very valid point.

Cheers.