Aircraft QoL

Discuss topics relating to Air Canada.

Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog

bcflyer
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1357
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:35 am
Location: Canada

Re: Aircraft QoL

Post by bcflyer »

Vanguard wrote: Mon Apr 17, 2023 7:04 am
rooster wrote: Sun Apr 16, 2023 11:31 am
Vanguard wrote: Wed Apr 12, 2023 11:56 am

That’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. Clearly you are an airbus pilot and don’t know what you’re talking about. Enough said.
Vanguard what are you so angry about?? So many of your posts you sit there and sling mud at people. Seriously what is so wrong in your life that you hide behind an internet username and unload your misery. It's sad, for you.

I only sling mud at people who deserve it and I call people out who don’t know what they’re talking about clearly.
Actually the other poster was bang on in their assessment. I’ve flown both and that’s exactly what happens. The Airbus tells you what’s wrong, the 737 gives you a master caution and you go hunting for what’s wrong.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Hysteria
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 10:22 pm

Re: Aircraft QoL

Post by Hysteria »

bob99 wrote: Thu Apr 13, 2023 1:09 pm Latest class
Yz 220- 7
UL 737- 4
YZ 320- 1
YZ 319- 4
YZ/UL 330FO- 2
UL 330RP- 3
YZ/UL 87RP- 5
YZ 87FO- 5
YZ/UL 77RP- 3
YZ 67- 1

787 FO out of ground school?

Does 787 FO in this scenario get scooped up first?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
daedalusx
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 818
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 7:51 am

Re: Aircraft QoL

Post by daedalusx »

Hysteria wrote: Mon Nov 13, 2023 7:26 pm
bob99 wrote: Thu Apr 13, 2023 1:09 pm Latest class
Yz 220- 7
UL 737- 4
YZ 320- 1
YZ 319- 4
YZ/UL 330FO- 2
UL 330RP- 3
YZ/UL 87RP- 5
YZ 87FO- 5
YZ/UL 77RP- 3
YZ 67- 1

787 FO out of ground school?

Does 787 FO in this scenario get scooped up first?
787 FO is arguably the worse position out of GS.
Shit seniority
Shit schedule
Pays the same as an RP position which has better seniority/schedule.
The insufferable shame of being the lowest paid WB FO worldwide.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Complex systems won’t survive the competence crisis
Hysteria
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 10:22 pm

Re: Aircraft QoL

Post by Hysteria »

daedalusx wrote: Mon Nov 13, 2023 11:50 pm
Hysteria wrote: Mon Nov 13, 2023 7:26 pm
bob99 wrote: Thu Apr 13, 2023 1:09 pm Latest class
Yz 220- 7
UL 737- 4
YZ 320- 1
YZ 319- 4
YZ/UL 330FO- 2
UL 330RP- 3
YZ/UL 87RP- 5
YZ 87FO- 5
YZ/UL 77RP- 3
YZ 67- 1

787 FO out of ground school?

Does 787 FO in this scenario get scooped up first?
787 FO is arguably the worse position out of GS.
Shit seniority
Shit schedule
Pays the same as an RP position which has better seniority/schedule.
The insufferable shame of being the lowest paid WB FO worldwide.
I understand. So, what is it in particular about the schedule that makes it worse than, let’s say, NB FO?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Canuck1988
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 9:49 pm

Re: Aircraft QoL

Post by Canuck1988 »

Hysteria wrote: Tue Nov 14, 2023 12:36 am
daedalusx wrote: Mon Nov 13, 2023 11:50 pm
Hysteria wrote: Mon Nov 13, 2023 7:26 pm


787 FO out of ground school?

Does 787 FO in this scenario get scooped up first?
787 FO is arguably the worse position out of GS.
Shit seniority
Shit schedule
Pays the same as an RP position which has better seniority/schedule.
The insufferable shame of being the lowest paid WB FO worldwide.
I understand. So, what is it in particular about the schedule that makes it worse than, let’s say, NB FO?
NB FO is a more junior spot. WB FO is a more senior spot. The NB FO will rise in seniority quicker, and may get a block and more control over their schedule quicker. A WB FO will be stuck bottom of the list for a long time, as more senior people parachute in ahead of them. They might be stuck on reserve forever, have next to no control over their schedule and get the crap flying.

As a WB FO vs RP, the RP gets all the juicy overseas flying, has a fairly efficient schedule (although some RP schedules are rough out of YUL/YYZ due to DH’s one way and short transatlantic flights). The RP will gain seniority in their position quicker as it is a more junior position. The WB may be stuck on reserve for a long time.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Hysteria
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 10:22 pm

Re: Aircraft QoL

Post by Hysteria »

Canuck1988 wrote: Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:06 am
Hysteria wrote: Tue Nov 14, 2023 12:36 am
daedalusx wrote: Mon Nov 13, 2023 11:50 pm

787 FO is arguably the worse position out of GS.
Shit seniority
Shit schedule
Pays the same as an RP position which has better seniority/schedule.
The insufferable shame of being the lowest paid WB FO worldwide.
I understand. So, what is it in particular about the schedule that makes it worse than, let’s say, NB FO?
NB FO is a more junior spot. WB FO is a more senior spot. The NB FO will rise in seniority quicker, and may get a block and more control over their schedule quicker. A WB FO will be stuck bottom of the list for a long time, as more senior people parachute in ahead of them. They might be stuck on reserve forever, have next to no control over their schedule and get the crap flying.

As a WB FO vs RP, the RP gets all the juicy overseas flying, has a fairly efficient schedule (although some RP schedules are rough out of YUL/YYZ due to DH’s one way and short transatlantic flights). The RP will gain seniority in their position quicker as it is a more junior position. The WB may be stuck on reserve for a long time.
Thanks, that makes perfect sense. Would you say WB FO is a more senior position these days than NB CA?

If you have the chance to upgrade to NB CA in, let's say, 2 years on property, do you have to be NB FO first? Or can you be an RP or WB FO and then upgrade to NB CA? I imagine the latter is viable through one's seniority number?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
daedalusx
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 818
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 7:51 am

Re: Aircraft QoL

Post by daedalusx »

Hysteria wrote: Tue Nov 14, 2023 10:17 am
Canuck1988 wrote: Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:06 am
Hysteria wrote: Tue Nov 14, 2023 12:36 am

I understand. So, what is it in particular about the schedule that makes it worse than, let’s say, NB FO?
NB FO is a more junior spot. WB FO is a more senior spot. The NB FO will rise in seniority quicker, and may get a block and more control over their schedule quicker. A WB FO will be stuck bottom of the list for a long time, as more senior people parachute in ahead of them. They might be stuck on reserve forever, have next to no control over their schedule and get the crap flying.

As a WB FO vs RP, the RP gets all the juicy overseas flying, has a fairly efficient schedule (although some RP schedules are rough out of YUL/YYZ due to DH’s one way and short transatlantic flights). The RP will gain seniority in their position quicker as it is a more junior position. The WB may be stuck on reserve for a long time.
Thanks, that makes perfect sense. Would you say WB FO is a more senior position these days than NB CA?

If you have the chance to upgrade to NB CA in, let's say, 2 years on property, do you have to be NB FO first? Or can you be an RP or WB FO and then upgrade to NB CA? I imagine the latter is viable through one's seniority number?
You can go from WB RP straight to NB CA as long as your seniority can hold the position. Upgrading to a type you’ve never operated before comes with its own set of challenges but it’s fairly common these days.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Complex systems won’t survive the competence crisis
Launchpad1
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 200
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2020 3:49 pm

Re: Aircraft QoL

Post by Launchpad1 »

You can go from WB RP straight to NB CA as long as your seniority can hold the position. Upgrading to a type you’ve never operated before comes with its own set of challenges but it’s fairly common these days.
Do you know which of the WB RP positions has the best QOL? From what I can tell the 330 seems to do the least length of pairings whereas the 787 has the longest.
---------- ADS -----------
 
scabbydoo
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 52
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2019 9:47 pm

Re: Aircraft QoL

Post by scabbydoo »

Launchpad1 wrote: Tue Nov 21, 2023 9:28 am
You can go from WB RP straight to NB CA as long as your seniority can hold the position. Upgrading to a type you’ve never operated before comes with its own set of challenges but it’s fairly common these days.
Do you know which of the WB RP positions has the best QOL? From what I can tell the 330 seems to do the least length of pairings whereas the 787 has the longest.
Keep in mind, the longer pairings make your schedule more efficient and are likely to have an augment unlike the 330 eched which can have sometimes 6 Atlantic crossings a month.
---------- ADS -----------
 
MaxAuto
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 154
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2022 2:25 pm

Re: Aircraft QoL

Post by MaxAuto »

Be senior on the junior aircraft for QOL
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Air Canada”