Actually the other poster was bang on in their assessment. I’ve flown both and that’s exactly what happens. The Airbus tells you what’s wrong, the 737 gives you a master caution and you go hunting for what’s wrong.Vanguard wrote: ↑Mon Apr 17, 2023 7:04 am
I only sling mud at people who deserve it and I call people out who don’t know what they’re talking about clearly.
Aircraft QoL
Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog
Re: Aircraft QoL
Re: Aircraft QoL
787 FO out of ground school?
Does 787 FO in this scenario get scooped up first?
Re: Aircraft QoL
787 FO is arguably the worse position out of GS.
Shit seniority
Shit schedule
Pays the same as an RP position which has better seniority/schedule.
The insufferable shame of being the lowest paid WB FO worldwide.
Complex systems won’t survive the competence crisis
Re: Aircraft QoL
I understand. So, what is it in particular about the schedule that makes it worse than, let’s say, NB FO?
-
- Rank 2
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 9:49 pm
Re: Aircraft QoL
NB FO is a more junior spot. WB FO is a more senior spot. The NB FO will rise in seniority quicker, and may get a block and more control over their schedule quicker. A WB FO will be stuck bottom of the list for a long time, as more senior people parachute in ahead of them. They might be stuck on reserve forever, have next to no control over their schedule and get the crap flying.Hysteria wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 12:36 amI understand. So, what is it in particular about the schedule that makes it worse than, let’s say, NB FO?
As a WB FO vs RP, the RP gets all the juicy overseas flying, has a fairly efficient schedule (although some RP schedules are rough out of YUL/YYZ due to DH’s one way and short transatlantic flights). The RP will gain seniority in their position quicker as it is a more junior position. The WB may be stuck on reserve for a long time.
Re: Aircraft QoL
Thanks, that makes perfect sense. Would you say WB FO is a more senior position these days than NB CA?Canuck1988 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:06 amNB FO is a more junior spot. WB FO is a more senior spot. The NB FO will rise in seniority quicker, and may get a block and more control over their schedule quicker. A WB FO will be stuck bottom of the list for a long time, as more senior people parachute in ahead of them. They might be stuck on reserve forever, have next to no control over their schedule and get the crap flying.
As a WB FO vs RP, the RP gets all the juicy overseas flying, has a fairly efficient schedule (although some RP schedules are rough out of YUL/YYZ due to DH’s one way and short transatlantic flights). The RP will gain seniority in their position quicker as it is a more junior position. The WB may be stuck on reserve for a long time.
If you have the chance to upgrade to NB CA in, let's say, 2 years on property, do you have to be NB FO first? Or can you be an RP or WB FO and then upgrade to NB CA? I imagine the latter is viable through one's seniority number?
Re: Aircraft QoL
You can go from WB RP straight to NB CA as long as your seniority can hold the position. Upgrading to a type you’ve never operated before comes with its own set of challenges but it’s fairly common these days.Hysteria wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 10:17 amThanks, that makes perfect sense. Would you say WB FO is a more senior position these days than NB CA?Canuck1988 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:06 amNB FO is a more junior spot. WB FO is a more senior spot. The NB FO will rise in seniority quicker, and may get a block and more control over their schedule quicker. A WB FO will be stuck bottom of the list for a long time, as more senior people parachute in ahead of them. They might be stuck on reserve forever, have next to no control over their schedule and get the crap flying.
As a WB FO vs RP, the RP gets all the juicy overseas flying, has a fairly efficient schedule (although some RP schedules are rough out of YUL/YYZ due to DH’s one way and short transatlantic flights). The RP will gain seniority in their position quicker as it is a more junior position. The WB may be stuck on reserve for a long time.
If you have the chance to upgrade to NB CA in, let's say, 2 years on property, do you have to be NB FO first? Or can you be an RP or WB FO and then upgrade to NB CA? I imagine the latter is viable through one's seniority number?
Complex systems won’t survive the competence crisis
-
- Rank 4
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2020 3:49 pm
Re: Aircraft QoL
Do you know which of the WB RP positions has the best QOL? From what I can tell the 330 seems to do the least length of pairings whereas the 787 has the longest.You can go from WB RP straight to NB CA as long as your seniority can hold the position. Upgrading to a type you’ve never operated before comes with its own set of challenges but it’s fairly common these days.
Re: Aircraft QoL
Keep in mind, the longer pairings make your schedule more efficient and are likely to have an augment unlike the 330 eched which can have sometimes 6 Atlantic crossings a month.Launchpad1 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2023 9:28 amDo you know which of the WB RP positions has the best QOL? From what I can tell the 330 seems to do the least length of pairings whereas the 787 has the longest.You can go from WB RP straight to NB CA as long as your seniority can hold the position. Upgrading to a type you’ve never operated before comes with its own set of challenges but it’s fairly common these days.