Air Canada bid is out

Discuss topics relating to Air Canada.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Traf
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 437
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 7:40 pm

Post by Traf »

Good thing we are not on the GS committee, something could actually get done.

Cheers
---------- ADS -----------
 
2low
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 802
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 9:17 am

Post by 2low »

WERD :o
---------- ADS -----------
 
balls
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 249
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 3:28 pm

Post by balls »

Traf wrote:Good thing we are not on the GS committee, something could actually get done.

Cheers
So long as we can stay away from who-poked-who-first type converstations, it is possible to talk about this stuff sensibly -- maybe.

My problems arise when I hear the sense of entitlement conversations from young folks, new hires, or someone wanting to cut off a chunk of my paycheque that after about 35 years I figure that I have paid my dues to have, finally.

When we talk about the Jazz/mainline issues, it is necessary to lay out what the benefits to each side might be without being protectionist. I see that mainline probably has some attactive equipment types for Jazz pilots that they can access. I see some attactive bases that Jazz might have for some AC pilots. If there is a one way street, there is no compromise on one side or another, and it is obvious there will never be an agreement of any sort.

The obvious issue of whipsawing has been in play since the beginning.

The politics of unions is a tough nut to crack. The same players have been at this for years and there are many egos to overcome in that arena alone.

As unlikely that there could be any kind of agreement. Like the factions of Iraq (or any country?), there are vested interests that will throw the proverbial nuke into the mix to attempt to destabilize.

Aisde from the weakness an inaccuracy of generalizations, dragging up the 'greedy mainline pilots' , 'never keep your promises', '$300 M', or 'when Picher is implemented', etc are definite conversation enders.

There will always be the :roll: :roll: :roll: types attempting to end any conversation on this issue I guess. Trouble is that it is very difficult to find the energy to discuss it any more.
---------- ADS -----------
 
exbengal
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 118
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 6:38 am

Post by exbengal »

Balls, for the last 10 years you have been loosing a chunk of your paycheque just to keep your CRJ's, you know WHIPSAW

And the way things have gone with Pulley and Dean Belhuemer etc. in the last few months (300 M) I'd say your going to keep loosing a good chunk of your garnisheed paycheque, pension.

How's that for a conservation ender.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Air Canada”