The Northwest Company

Got a hot employment or interview tip to help a fellow aviator find a job or looking for a little job advice place your posting here.

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako

Doc
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 9241
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 6:28 am

Re: The Northwest Company

Post by Doc »

cdnpilot77 wrote:
trey kule wrote:So where does one gain experience when you bastards only want to hire experienced pilots? Now how many times have I heard that? Foggy said it much more kindly and elegantly than I would of. But you asked.

Trey, I did not call anyone a "bastard", nor did I ever imply that you guys are wrong for doing it the way you do, just trying to understand. Regardless of how many hours someone has in the book, if they are new to the pressurized turbine environment, they are going to need some mentoring from the captain and if there is a decompression at fl220, the 5000hr f/o may still panic and start crying while going into shock, unlikely sure...but whos to know?

I also happen to agree that the "entitlement" is way out of control. Taking client requirements and contrails etc out of the equation, when is the right time to start the transition into more complex machines as f/o? 500hrs? 750? 1000? 3000? Is there a right answer?
He exercised "artistic licence" and inserted the word "bastard" into the quote. Mainly because that's the prevailing sentiment we get from low time pilots.
Bottom line? Companies can hire whoever they want to fly them around the friendly skies.
As for the actual time requirement to get your ass into a complex machine? Right place, right time has always been the mantra. I knew a flying instructor who got the right seat job on a G2, because he just happened to be walking through the hangar when they need someone. True.
---------- ADS -----------
 
trey kule
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4766
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 7:09 pm

Re: The Northwest Company

Post by trey kule »

obvious lack of cross cockpit
Huh? Please expand on the obvious part, as I am not sure what you are referring to here.

I do love the "safety issue" though. who can argue with safety? Unless of course it is not obvious.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Accident speculation:
Those that post don’t know. Those that know don’t post
Doc
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 9241
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 6:28 am

Re: The Northwest Company

Post by Doc »

Perhaps he means an "angry" cockpit? As in cross = angry?
I've heard that "gay" can = "happy"
I'm confused.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Benwa
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 850
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:28 pm
Location: CYQB

Re: The Northwest Company

Post by Benwa »

And to the opposite end of the spectrum, I'm upgrading one of my guys to a Single Pilot position on the C441... @ 750hrs Total Time. It's a 702 ops though.
---------- ADS -----------
 
--In his wrapup remarks, the FAA chief said, "If you think the safety bar is set too high, then your
standards are set too low."
iflyforpie
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8133
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:25 pm
Location: Winterfell...

Re: The Northwest Company

Post by iflyforpie »

We used to fly cantankerous, unreliable, complex, overloaded, and underpowered four engined bombers single pilot at night into war zones with 400TT. Pretty sure a 441 is a piece of cake in comparison.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Geez did I say that....? Or just think it....?
User avatar
jpilot77
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 737
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 5:11 pm
Location: North of YMX

Re: The Northwest Company

Post by jpilot77 »

We used to fly cantankerous, unreliable, complex, overloaded, and underpowered four engined bombers single pilot at night into war zones with 400TT. Pretty sure a 441 is a piece of cake in comparison.
And those guys wheren't even the top of there class (the best being moved on to fighters).
---------- ADS -----------
 
Welcome to Redneck Airlines. We might not get you there but we'll get you close!
Lurch
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2043
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 11:42 pm

Re: The Northwest Company

Post by Lurch »

jpilot77 wrote:And those guys wheren't even the top of there class (the best being moved on to fighters).
Wrong, the best stayed in country and became instructors. :wink:

Lurch
---------- ADS -----------
 
Take my love
Take my land
Take me where I cannot stand
I don't care
I'm still free
You cannot take the sky from me
User avatar
jpilot77
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 737
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 5:11 pm
Location: North of YMX

Re: The Northwest Company

Post by jpilot77 »

Wrong, the best stayed in country and became instructors.
You're right, so in effect they would have been the third cut.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Welcome to Redneck Airlines. We might not get you there but we'll get you close!
User avatar
cdnpilot77
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 6:24 pm

Re: The Northwest Company

Post by cdnpilot77 »

BE20 Driver wrote:We should all start a pool on how long the next guy or girl will last. I'll take November. Anyone else in on the action?
We have to be getting close to a new ad, its been 2 months. Over under is set at 30days, september 27.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Captain_Canuck
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 220
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 10:06 am
Location: At your mums house!

Re: The Northwest Company

Post by Captain_Canuck »

cdnpilot77 wrote:
BE20 Driver wrote:We should all start a pool on how long the next guy or girl will last. I'll take November. Anyone else in on the action?
We have to be getting close to a new ad, its been 2 months. Over under is set at 30days, september 27.
I'll take those odds
---------- ADS -----------
 
BE20 Driver
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 571
Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 12:58 pm

Re: The Northwest Company

Post by BE20 Driver »

I'll be optimistic and stick with my November guess. Specifically, Monday november 14th, 2011 +/- 30 days.
---------- ADS -----------
 
doubletime
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 1:12 pm

Re: The Northwest Company

Post by doubletime »

Red Bandit wrote:Having worked there I know from experience that things are exactly as others have indicated. The CP is unbelievably difficult to work with. For direct entry Captains (rare) I had a bond to cover the exact cost of Flight Safety (~$9K USD). This bond did not decrease over time and was 18 months. For FO's there is no bond as they do not send you to Flight Safety right away. Likely because they have a revolving door for the right seaters. What they don't tell the new FO's is that they are on a 3 month trial to see if they are "worth" sending to Flight Safety, at which time there will be a bond. I was fired without cause, given no notice and told to beat it. At least the bond was torn up.

I strongly caution all that are going to look at this place. Also, watch for "other duties as assigned" in the job description. This can include all kinds of ridiculous tasks.

Maybe if they tore up the bond, you WERE fired with cause!!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Red Bandit
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 6:28 pm

Re: The Northwest Company

Post by Red Bandit »

I would agree, I was fired with cause but they didn't/couldn't back it up with anything that's why it went the way it did. I am in no way happy with the decision that was made but like so many things in life there is nothing I can do about it.

Just like so many others with hours in the book and no job. The glories of being a pilot :rolleyes:
---------- ADS -----------
 
mbav8r
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2325
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:11 am
Location: Manitoba

Re: The Northwest Company

Post by mbav8r »

I'm confused, "fired with cause" means justified, in which case they could hold you to the bond. I believe most bonds have a caveat that if you are fired due to your own actions you are still liable for the remainder of the bond.
That way if you want out of your bond for other employment, you can't just walk in and tell the boss to foxtrot oscar, to get yourself fired and off you go.
If you are fired "without cause" ie;they just don't like you,they cannot hold you to the bond.
---------- ADS -----------
 
"Stand-by, I'm inverted"
trey kule
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4766
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 7:09 pm

Re: The Northwest Company

Post by trey kule »

It is not always about what you can do..Sometimes, from a company standpoint you want an indvidual gone so badly, and want absolutely nothing to do with them in the future, so you will cancel a bond, employment contract, pay unrequired severance...pretty much anything just so you never have to deal with them again.
This is particularily true in the corporate world where the pilots interact with company people on a continuing basis.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Accident speculation:
Those that post don’t know. Those that know don’t post
Post Reply

Return to “Employment Forum”