a220hereicome wrote: ↑Tue Jul 27, 2021 9:16 am
RRJetPilot wrote: ↑Tue Jul 27, 2021 8:55 am
I think CUPE would represent the pilots better than ACPA. Ridiculous.
Right.
7000 FA layoffs (about 80% of the workforce) while those remaining are blocked to 80 hours, with some flying over 100 hours/month and bragging that they've never been busier.
Is that what you had in mind?
Those that don't like how "seniority" works can maybe not try to get employed by a carrier that has one? Maybe?
I think those that brag about "excess work" are in the definite minority. It's no different on the pilot side, there are plenty of draft hogs and VO listers...... however, the FA's elected reps aren't doing 90 hour months.
Layoffs are a way of life in Aviation. Those that don't get that when they start are either naive or stupid. Those that don't get layed-off at least once are in the lucky minority.
You could try to justify the 50 and 63 hour lets forever, but the fact remains that ACPA signed a Let to allow outsourcing and scope violations to mitigate layoffs. There is
NO WAY that we would have layed-off as many pilots as FA's. The cascading downbid would have been paralyzingly expensive and time consuming. There is no way they would have left themselves that short for the time it took to retrain everyone.
Pilot payroll is too cheep in the big scheme of things.....especially when there is a risk of a manning shortage and parked planes. Pilots need to get that through their thick skulls.
Unfortunately, pilots don't think that way. They think that the entire operation depends on them and that they are "kingpin" to the success or failure of the Corp. That's rubbish. Pilots are like engines.
Not one plane leaves without two of them. Marketing and strategic planning determine the number of pilots on payroll, not "generous gives" from a union that literally trips over itself to look like "good little helpers" at the expense of their members financial viability. The Corp couldn't care less if the pilots "gave" or not, so little is payroll to the "big picture".
The real kicker is that ACPA gave flying away to save lay-off that likely didn't need much saving. The 50 and 63 hour "gives" are icing on the cake.