ORNGE?

Got a hot employment or interview tip to help a fellow aviator find a job or looking for a little job advice place your posting here.

Moderators: Sulako, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia

User avatar
spaner
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 174
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 4:18 am
Location: BC Interior

Re: ORNGE?

Post by spaner »

Post deleted
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by spaner on Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:35 am, edited 4 times in total.
Just another canuck
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2083
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 6:21 am
Location: The Lake.

Re: ORNGE?

Post by Just another canuck »

pilot21 wrote:I feel for all the guys that will have to sign a bond. I had to do the same not too long ago. Unfortunately that is part of the business and if you want on the wheel you will have to play the game. A 1 year commitment is not too much to ask I think. If you were planning on leaving before that time than this would not be the job for you anyways. Again Doc and Cat I see the point you are making but don't ask me to feel sorry for the other guy. We have all been there.
Part of the business... well, let's make it NOT part of the business. No, a one year commitment is not too much to ask but forking over 10 G's is... and a contract that says they keep the cash for failing a PPC is... or losing your license for any of the many reasons. Or how about not paying back the amount with full interest. This contract is a bunch of bullshit. Do you or do you not see that?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Twenty years from now you'll be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the things you did do.
So throw off the bowlines.
Sail away from the safe harbor.
Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore. Dream. Discover.
Mustang06
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 187
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 8:35 pm
Location: the sky

Re: ORNGE?

Post by Mustang06 »

Imagine the pressure you will have and how nervous you will be the day of your PPC knowing that if you fail the ride you will loose not only your job but also 10K, that's completely unfair for the pilot.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Fly baby fly!!!
User avatar
spaner
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 174
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 4:18 am
Location: BC Interior

Re: ORNGE?

Post by spaner »

Post deleted
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by spaner on Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
2R
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4328
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 2:25 pm
Location: left coast

Re: ORNGE?

Post by 2R »

So now we have beaten the bond thing down again ,perhaps we could beat the single engine ,single generator thing for a while ? :wink: :wink:

Or we could advance the theory that the downfall of the air ambulance stock has been the people awarding the contracts to the lowest bidder.Not rewarding those who expertise has safely guided and built the industry to a world class standard.
Why is it that the Government thinks it needs new aircraft to provide the service but refuses to award contracts that would allow investment in private operators to invest in new aircraft ?
The government has spent/commited to spending 260 millions when the original budget provision by Bill 171 limited the annual budget to 15 millions .
Anyhoo i do hope that it does result in better service to the Patients even if those patients have "no choice" about flying in single engine aircraft .
---------- ADS -----------
 
Eleveniron
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 94
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:35 pm

Re: ORNGE?

Post by Eleveniron »

2R wrote:So now we have beaten the bond thing down again ,perhaps we could beat the single engine ,single generator thing for a while ? :wink: :wink:

Or we could advance the theory that the downfall of the air ambulance stock has been the people awarding the contracts to the lowest bidder.Not rewarding those who expertise has safely guided and built the industry to a world class standard.
Why is it that the Government thinks it needs new aircraft to provide the service but refuses to award contracts that would allow investment in private operators to invest in new aircraft ?
The government has spent/commited to spending 260 millions when the original budget provision by Bill 171 limited the annual budget to 15 millions .
Anyhoo i do hope that it does result in better service to the Patients even if those patients have "no choice" about flying in single engine aircraft .

Nor does the patient have a choice about;

1) the age of the aircraft and the quality of the equipment
2) the competancy of the pilots
3) the competancy of the medics
4) the quality of the maintenance
5) the weather
6) etc...

How many medivac patients have died in a plane crash as the result of an engine failure on a single engine turboprop? How many have died when the plane they were transported in flew into the ground or a tower or for numerous other reasons.

Rather than buy new aircraft for Ornge, if the gov't funded Air Barvo (or any carrier for that matter) to but new PC12s, would that be a better situation?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Cat Driver
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 18921
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm

Re: ORNGE?

Post by Cat Driver »


How many medivac patients have died in a plane crash as the result of an engine failure on a single engine turboprop?
How many have been flying medivacs?
---------- ADS -----------
 
The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no


After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
Eleveniron
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 94
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:35 pm

Re: ORNGE?

Post by Eleveniron »

Cat Driver wrote:

How many medivac patients have died in a plane crash as the result of an engine failure on a single engine turboprop?
How many have been flying medivacs?
How many SETP? Not sure on specific numbers...would have to do some pokin around. There are Caravans and PC12s in Canada doing medivac...and i know the PC-12 is doing a lot in other parts of the world.

But my point is there are a ton of issues that affect the patient's safety that he/she has no choice over, and the number of engines strapped on is only one factor. And up until now, it hasn't even played a role. I know, sooner or later it will happen...it's simple math. But it's still not the primary factor to be considered in the safety of the patient, crew and medics. Yet many are focusing on the SE issue only.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Cat Driver
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 18921
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm

Re: ORNGE?

Post by Cat Driver »

Yet many are focusing on the SE issue only.
Why do you not see single engine airplanes in the airlines?
---------- ADS -----------
 
The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no


After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
Eleveniron
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 94
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:35 pm

Re: ORNGE?

Post by Eleveniron »

Cat Driver wrote:
Yet many are focusing on the SE issue only.
Why do you not see single engine airplanes in the airlines?
Well, actually you do. There's many Caravans and PC12s operating in CAR 703, FAR 131 Ops and foreign equivelants.

If you're talking 705 Ops, no as far as I know nothing exists. Do I think it will happen? No... but it also comes down to risk management. If the single fan does quit, the odds of landing safely in a 703 category aircraft far outweigh that of 704 or 705 (considering speeds, weights, size, etc.).

Would I ever want a SETP crossing the pond commercially? No. Then again, 30 years ago how many people believed airlines would be crossing the pond with only 2 engines? Again, risk management. Advances in technology allow the industry to make these changes, and society to accept them.

Someday Cat, you too will embrace it... :wink:
---------- ADS -----------
 
1,2,3&4
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 3:21 pm

Re: ORNGE?

Post by 1,2,3&4 »

So does anyone who has had an interview have any information on what to expect during the second interview? And for that matter, is there room for negotiations on this ridiculous bond for people with no Pilatus time?
---------- ADS -----------
 
donut king
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 9:20 pm

Re: ORNGE?

Post by donut king »

Eleveniron wrote:
2R wrote:Do the ORNGE Helicopter pilots sign a bond or pay up front ?
Ornge doesn't have heli pilots...Canadian Heli does. Not sure about them.


ORNGE does not employ helicopter pilots yet! They are still employees of Canadian Helicopters Limited....until 2012. New AW139 a/c to be implemented during and up to 2012 inclusive.

No training cost/ bond bulls**t to these pilots. They are unionised as of a few years ago.

ORNGE dispatchers and medics are unionised. CHL pilots same. Only non union workers are CHL helicopter engineers, ORNGE fixed wing drivers and engineers.

I'm thinking of going back to EMS because of union and stability (gov't work)! Will wait for the full ORNGE takeover!
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Cat Driver
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 18921
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm

Re: ORNGE?

Post by Cat Driver »

Someday Cat, you too will embrace it... :wink:
I very much doubt I will live long enough to embrace single engine IFR in any airplane.

Over the decades I developed some " Risk management " decisions that have served me well.

They are.

I do not fly single engine wheel equipped airplanes over water beyond gliding distance from land.

I do not fly single engine airplanes at night X/ country.

I do not fly single engine IFR.

I do not fly single pilot IFR.

These decisions were my own personal limits that I felt made my survival more likely.

Then again I am a bit of a coward when it comes to risk exposure, maybe it is because I am not a top gun type of personality? :mrgreen:
---------- ADS -----------
 
The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no


After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
futboler14
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 164
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 5:34 pm
Location: northish

Re: ORNGE?

Post by futboler14 »

getting a little annoyed with there ads... hasn't it been months and there still looking for people?

whats going on over there?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Phlyer
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 859
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 10:46 pm

Re: ORNGE?

Post by Phlyer »

futboler14 wrote:getting a little annoyed with there ads... hasn't it been months and there still looking for people?

whats going on over there?
What going on is that pilots are taking a stand and saying 'NO' to this kind of BS money up front, myself included. Keep it up! :smt038
The only way we can change this crap is by sticking together.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
raven54
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 548
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 9:14 am
Location: a dumpster

Re: ORNGE?

Post by raven54 »

Gotta agree with Cat, the more fans the better.
---------- ADS -----------
 
ng78
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 213
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 5:48 pm

Re: ORNGE?

Post by ng78 »

I guess they don't need F/O's right now, only captains.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Doc
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 9241
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 6:28 am

Re: ORNGE?

Post by Doc »

ng78 wrote:I guess they don't need F/O's right now, only captains.
How exciting is that!

Right now, the thought of working for a shiny new company, flying nice new airplanes looks pretty glamorous. And, I'll admit, that to some, it has it's attractions.
BUT
There's always a "but".
Flying a single engine airplane will get tired. Fast.
Flying medevacs will get tired. Fast.
Realizing that your "cargo" is making a lot more money than you, for only working on one leg, will get tired. Fast.
---------- ADS -----------
 
ng78
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 213
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 5:48 pm

Re: ORNGE?

Post by ng78 »

Doc, your points are valid. However, I can think of far worse ways to build time and earn a living as a pilot. I still think Ornge would represent a fantastic opportunity for pilots who don't have a huge amount of time under their belts.
---------- ADS -----------
 
ipilot54
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 206
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 6:58 am

Re: ORNGE?

Post by ipilot54 »

Not for long.................
---------- ADS -----------
 
ng78
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 213
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 5:48 pm

Re: ORNGE?

Post by ng78 »

ipilot54 wrote:Not for long.................
Care to elaborate?
---------- ADS -----------
 
upduck
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:39 pm

Re: ORNGE?

Post by upduck »

NorthSky wrote:
Eleveniron wrote:
Brown Bear wrote:TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS UP FRONT!!!!!!!! :smt040 :smt040 :smt040 :smt040 :smt040 :smt040 :smt040 :smt040 :smt040 :smt040 :smt040

JUST ANOTHER MAGGOT COMPANY! TOLD YOU SO!!!!! :smt040 :smt040 :smt040 :smt040 :smt040 :smt040 :smt040 :smt040 :smt040

LET'S RAISE THE BAR!!!! :smt040 :smt040 :smt040 :smt040 :smt040

:bear: :bear:
Really Brown? where'd you confirm that? Is that capts and FOs?
Here it is:
Ah Hah!!! Anyone notice similarities here? Come on boys and girls, where have we seen this kind of bonding before? Think real hard now? I'll give you a hint. The new point man at ORNGE was the old point man at ............... Do we have a winner? Ladies and gentlemen, the million dollar answer is ......... ding ding ding ding ding VEE OH WHY EH GEE EEE YOU ARR :smt040 :smt040 :smt040

Did somebody say "BOND SCUM"? :axe:
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
oldncold
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1079
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 11:17 am
Location: south of 78N latitude , north of 30'latitude

Re: ORNGE?

Post by oldncold »

cat // the no s.e.ifr //no s.p.ifr has served you well and i respect that but wop may did medvac in 1929 to fort vermillion single engine.

now this is not to say that it wasn't risky and they did have some issues true !

but surely in heaven even you have to admit that technology has advanced in the last 80 years. I even bet a timmy's you phone your wife on a cell or sat phone in flight to let her know not to worry and that you will be an hour late for dinner eh.

the pc12 2crew with lots of gas(2700lbs burning 350lbs/hr up above 25k) efis/ gpws/ traffic/ wx radar/ 30thousand service ceiling / is alot safer than 2 radials ovr the pacific with 1700miles still to go night. and a oscillating oil pressure gauge on the #1

it is all matter of the times we grew up in and to which we now find ourselves a part off. all of us youngs appreciate ( well most do ) the advancements that the previous generation in aviation has made . heck my old man had to grease evry zirc fitteing on a bell 47 every 25 hrs which in the summer meant he was walking around with a grease gun in his hand .now with star flex and elastomerics in his last yrs as ame felt that he was missing something ( it was the grease gun) fly on cat fly on // the sun never will set on you if you fly west fast enough!! 8)
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
square
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 951
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 4:36 pm

Re: ORNGE?

Post by square »

Every student in Canada has been flying SP-SE-night everyday of the week .. haven't heard of many accidents and it's not much worse than flying SE over much of the bog or boulder that is western Canada.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Cat Driver
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 18921
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm

Re: ORNGE?

Post by Cat Driver »

To each his own, I would wager that I have more single engine time in more different types of aircraft than most of you here.

Same goes for single pilot IFR.

As to this comment:
haven't heard of many accidents and it's not much worse than flying SE over much of the bog or boulder that is western Canada.
Have you considered I probably have flown in more different countries than you have different areas of Canada square?

Like I said before I have my own self set rules for what and where I fly based on my own personal evaluation of what risks I am willing to take.

When the rest of you get to my stage of flying I'm betting you also will no longer want to fly airplanes where there is risk you can avoid by choice.

Anyhow I'm content with over thirty thousand accident free hours which I would like to believe were partly due to good decision making as I progressed through my career.
---------- ADS -----------
 
The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no


After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
Post Reply

Return to “Employment Forum”