Dempster flame out?

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog

swordfish
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 745
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 12:18 am
Location: CYZF

Re: Dempster flame out?

Post by swordfish »

Too_Low wrote:Could it have been a new capt? How does one figure 800# for an hour's flight with two turbines? It's shocking to see how it happened, but I still hold out a hope that (s)he doesn't get too ruined over it...a shame really.
Fly it in auto-lean.....
---------- ADS -----------
 
'effin hippie
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 308
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:44 pm
Location: Further..further...ok, too far...

Re: Dempster flame out?

Post by 'effin hippie »

OK. Right.

I have worked for some real douche-bags. Not one of them ever said "Go get in that airplane without suffient reserves and go to CXXX." Or was foolish enough to order anyone to fly overweight.
No, they simply rewarded guys who "Got'er done" without asking too many questions, and effectively judged flightcrew on their ability to maximize their utility to the company without regard to regulation per se. Obviously, getting caught or bending metal lowered utility, so folks were being judged partly on safety, but not primarily.

Looking back on the better part of a decade in 703/704 I am amazed at my own naivite when I was starting out. The truth, as someone has pointed out, is that the majority of low-timers on their first job don't need to be pushed, but reined in from undue risk-taking out of enthusiasm and ignorance.

It is nice to see people coming out in defence of their employer. It truly is, and it shows that N-W must be doing some things right. Nonetheless, to suggest that two very serious incidents in three years are freak examples of isolated pilot error and totally unconnected to the company culture that was not only giving them their entry into professional aviation but which those pilots actually lived in every waking moment?
That not only strains credulity, but misses the point. Completely.

ef
---------- ADS -----------
 
Four1oh
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2448
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 9:24 pm

Re: Dempster flame out?

Post by Four1oh »

Yup, never pushed, but sure did praise the guy(s) who pushed it to git'er done, while openly teasing(or worse) the guys who weren't 'comfortable' going in that weather, or taking that load, or cutting that one corner on fuel... etc...
---------- ADS -----------
 
Drinking outside the box.
Donald
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2439
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:34 am
Location: Canada

Re: Dempster flame out?

Post by Donald »

Too_Low wrote:Could it have been a new capt? How does one figure 800# for an hour's flight with two turbines?
Let's see....

167nm distance

Airplane cruises at about 190kts

Typical fuel flow in cruise is 300lbs/side.

Add your taxi/climb/approach + reserve and what do you get?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Phileas Fogg
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 164
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 5:37 pm

Re: Dempster flame out?

Post by Phileas Fogg »

I'm pretty sure those Dash 20's burnt about 550 lb/hr...

Not a huge difference but 800 lb out of YGH for YEV is technically legal for the flight and 30 min VFR reserve - thats cutting your options though!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Carrier
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 481
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 6:48 am
Location: Where the job is!

Re: Dempster flame out?

Post by Carrier »

http://www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/stand ... /oct09.htm

Prairie & Northern May 2, 2009 CAR 602.88(2) $1,000 monetary penalty

A commercial pilot flying a Beech 99 was on a return VFR flight when he encountered a double engine failure and was forced to land on a highway. In the investigation that followed, it was determined that the double engine failure was caused by fuel starvation. The pilot had commenced the flight without sufficient fuel to complete the flight. The pilot was sanctioned with a $1,000.00 monetary penalty.
---------- ADS -----------
 
ScudRunner
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3239
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 11:58 am

Re: Dempster flame out?

Post by ScudRunner »

I think they should ban Twin Turbine VFR its just not safe.
---------- ADS -----------
 
C-FABH
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 783
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 8:06 am

Re: Dempster flame out?

Post by C-FABH »

Guess that poor guy won't be eating for a month

:smt064
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”