Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, Right Seat Captain, lilfssister, North Shore
Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..
Rule books are paper - they will not cushion a sudden meeting of stone and metal.
— Ernest K. Gann, 'Fate is the Hunter.
— Ernest K. Gann, 'Fate is the Hunter.
Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..
It might have been better if they hadn't got confused in their call to ATC and ended up with the approach lights off. They ended up at 300ft with no runway in sight but the ground visible, and at 200ft they finally saw it but were quite a ways off centreline. Would have been much simpler if they'd just asked for the approach lights on like they were intending to do 
Also, it's pretty easy to do when there isn't any turbulence. Try it when your 172 is bouncing about like a wild stallion and the KAP140 can't even manage to do the approach, and I'll be a bit more impressed.

Also, it's pretty easy to do when there isn't any turbulence. Try it when your 172 is bouncing about like a wild stallion and the KAP140 can't even manage to do the approach, and I'll be a bit more impressed.
Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..
Wouldn't there have been a NOTAM stating PCL is u/s?
- cdnpilot77
- Rank 10
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 6:24 pm
Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..
Also easy to be an armchair quarterback waiting to be impressed by a student pilot and cutting them down instead.CpnCrunch wrote:It might have been better if they hadn't got confused in their call to ATC and ended up with the approach lights off. They ended up at 300ft with no runway in sight but the ground visible, and at 200ft they finally saw it but were quite a ways off centreline. Would have been much simpler if they'd just asked for the approach lights on like they were intending to do
Also, it's pretty easy to do when there isn't any turbulence. Try it when your 172 is bouncing about like a wild stallion and the KAP140 can't even manage to do the approach, and I'll be a bit more impressed.

- cdnpilot77
- Rank 10
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 6:24 pm
Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..
I was impressed by the instructors natural encouragement, coaching and congratulatory nature...he seemed a bit nervous but his overall demeanour obviously rubs off on this student. I didn't listen to all the dialogue afterwards, so maybe I missed something?
Last edited by cdnpilot77 on Sat May 02, 2015 10:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Shiny Side Up
- Top Poster
- Posts: 5335
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:02 pm
- Location: Group W bench
Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..
I'm just uncertain whether Strega is being sarcastic or not.
We can't stop here! This is BAT country!
- cdnpilot77
- Rank 10
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 6:24 pm
Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..
I was wondering the same.Shiny Side Up wrote:I'm just uncertain whether Strega is being sarcastic or not.
Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..
No, you missed my point (although perhaps I wasn't clear). I was just pointing out that flightchops isn't any worse than this guy. I don't really have anything against these videos, just playing devil's advocate because I don't really think it's fair to be constantly bashing flightchops.cdnpilot77 wrote:Also easy to be an armchair quarterback waiting to be impressed by a student pilot and cutting them down instead.CpnCrunch wrote:It might have been better if they hadn't got confused in their call to ATC and ended up with the approach lights off. They ended up at 300ft with no runway in sight but the ground visible, and at 200ft they finally saw it but were quite a ways off centreline. Would have been much simpler if they'd just asked for the approach lights on like they were intending to do
Also, it's pretty easy to do when there isn't any turbulence. Try it when your 172 is bouncing about like a wild stallion and the KAP140 can't even manage to do the approach, and I'll be a bit more impressed.
-
- Top Poster
- Posts: 8132
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:25 pm
- Location: Winterfell...
Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..
Other than the facial hair and leaving zero margin for error, I don't see the difference either. 

Geez did I say that....? Or just think it....?
Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..
cdnpilot77 wrote:I was wondering the same.Shiny Side Up wrote:I'm just uncertain whether Strega is being sarcastic or not.
Me 3...
Rule books are paper - they will not cushion a sudden meeting of stone and metal.
— Ernest K. Gann, 'Fate is the Hunter.
— Ernest K. Gann, 'Fate is the Hunter.
Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..
"The real Deal"
Hmmmm. Maybe Some think 172's should routinely shoot approaches to minimums without approach lights instead of diverting to an alternate that was clearly open. Nahhh, do this instead and make a video.
Hey, just add night conditions and chance of icing, and they can be even cooler. That's whats its all about, right? Or.......
Hmmmm. Maybe Some think 172's should routinely shoot approaches to minimums without approach lights instead of diverting to an alternate that was clearly open. Nahhh, do this instead and make a video.
Hey, just add night conditions and chance of icing, and they can be even cooler. That's whats its all about, right? Or.......
- Shiny Side Up
- Top Poster
- Posts: 5335
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:02 pm
- Location: Group W bench
Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..
Indeed, that dead horse has been beaten enough. "Mr. Aviation's" videos aren't much different, and while I don't begrudge them, in quite a few that I viewed before Strega's recommendation, he makes a lots of unwise choices, one where he and some friends pick their way through some CBs comes to mind. But unless Strega is going to offer his own commentary about what he thinks is wrong about the video, repeatedly posting threads here what I'm assuming are in a disparaging manner, serves little point. Everyone already knows how the avcanada membership feel about them.CpnCrunch wrote: I don't really have anything against these videos, just playing devil's advocate because I don't really think it's fair to be constantly bashing flightchops.
We can't stop here! This is BAT country!
Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..
Flight chops is a joke.... product of a typical "flight school" mentality...
Mr aviation actually does things,, including shooting an ils to minimums, and yes, hold your breath, dodge some cbs... Those that have not left the circuit in any capacity outside of their training will not understand this.
Mr aviation actually does things,, including shooting an ils to minimums, and yes, hold your breath, dodge some cbs... Those that have not left the circuit in any capacity outside of their training will not understand this.
Rule books are paper - they will not cushion a sudden meeting of stone and metal.
— Ernest K. Gann, 'Fate is the Hunter.
— Ernest K. Gann, 'Fate is the Hunter.
Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..
I'm so impressed. Videos like this do a disservice to actual wise risk management. It isn't "cool" for a 172 to pick its way through CB's, either. Theres no place for this macho Top Gun crap in impressionable minds.Strega wrote:Flight chops is a joke.... product of a typical "flight school" mentality...
Mr aviation actually does things,, including shooting an ils to minimums, and yes, hold your breath, dodge some cbs... Those that have not left the circuit in any capacity outside of their training will not understand this.
Edit --
That being said I looked but haven't seen the video, but "picking through CB's" -- I'm further assuming no WX radar -- doesn't sound like avoiding them by 25 miles, either. Pretty hard to pick through CB's that are embedded in IMC, too.
It's the mentality of making videos that lead to one doing cooler and cooler things, until one makes a big mistake, i don't support.
My $0.02.
Last edited by Rookie50 on Sun May 03, 2015 2:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..
I didn't see the one with the CBs. Which one is it?
Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..
It's the mentality of making videos that lead to one doing cooler and cooler things, until one makes a big mistake, i don't support.
So should we all just stay home then?
FYI the reason that stormscopes are installed in 172s or small cessnas it to aid in avoiding flying through a cell.. no?
Rule books are paper - they will not cushion a sudden meeting of stone and metal.
— Ernest K. Gann, 'Fate is the Hunter.
— Ernest K. Gann, 'Fate is the Hunter.
Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..
Did they have a stormscope? I have one, and it's certainly NOT sufficient. Lightning is not a prerequisite for cells that will rip one apart, throw one out of control, or at best, terrify you and your unlucky pax.Strega wrote:It's the mentality of making videos that lead to one doing cooler and cooler things, until one makes a big mistake, i don't support.
So should we all just stay home then?
FYI the reason that stormscopes are installed in 172s or small cessnas it to aid in avoiding flying through a cell.. no?
Yeah, this is real, good mentorship chatter for new pilots too.

Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..
The pas devant les enfants theme is so dull, don't you think?
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
- Shiny Side Up
- Top Poster
- Posts: 5335
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:02 pm
- Location: Group W bench
Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..
Amen.photofly wrote:The pas devant les enfants theme is so dull, don't you think?
We can't stop here! This is BAT country!
-
- Top Poster
- Posts: 5924
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 7:17 pm
- Location: West Coast
Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..
Better than a "pour encourager les autres" hubris........photofly wrote:The pas devant les enfants theme is so dull, don't you think?
Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..
Those guys got too much crap in there with them...
Cameras, tablets, efb...
Pretty boy posers.
Cameras, tablets, efb...
Pretty boy posers.
Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..
I do not think that quote means what you think it means.Big Pistons Forever wrote: Better than a "pour encourager les autres" hubris........
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..
what's that supposed to mean?Strega wrote:Flight chops is a joke.... product of a typical "flight school" mentality...
- Shiny Side Up
- Top Poster
- Posts: 5335
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:02 pm
- Location: Group W bench
Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..
It means that really, really awesome pilots like Strega didn't learn at a flight school or even with an instructor. As natural born pilots they were dropped out of the sky by Zeus, they learned to fly on the way down, and thus are a superior breed. Much like a North Korean dictator. They are completely self made, by a striking combination of innate iron will, genetic superiority and divine favour. They willed themselves to know how to fly in a process similar to Neo learning Kung-fu. Amazingly they also overcame any obstacles that flight schools, instructors and the regulator, all tools of some nameless old-one underdemon placed in their way.Lindsey wrote:what's that supposed to mean?Strega wrote:Flight chops is a joke.... product of a typical "flight school" mentality...
If you were unfortunate enough to have learned to fly at a flight school it would be inconceivable for you to match their flying prowess.
We can't stop here! This is BAT country!
Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..
Cthulhu is working for Transport, now?Shiny Side Up wrote:Amazingly they also overcame any obstacles that flight schools, instructors and the regulator, all tools of some nameless old-one underdemon placed in their way.

DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.