Medevacs...with a Jetstream?

Got a hot employment or interview tip to help a fellow aviator find a job or looking for a little job advice place your posting here.

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako

co-joe
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4770
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 2:33 am
Location: YYC 230 degree radial at about 10 DME

Medevacs...with a Jetstream?

Post by co-joe »

OK I've read it 5 times, rubbed my eyes, re-read it 5 more times... I guess my question is...Why?
We have an outstanding opportunity for a JS31/32 Captain to join our team in Calgary! Reporting to the Chief Pilot, this candidate will be responsible for various duties and responsibilities regarding flight medevac services.
http://www.avcanada.ca/forums2/viewtopi ... 7&t=107636
---------- ADS -----------
 
Sky_Conqueror
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 179
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 10:18 am

Re: Medevacs...with a Jetstream?

Post by Sky_Conqueror »

Simple to explain. As we all know...Alberta's economy went to shits recently. They decided to transform their Jetstreams for Medevac operations. Bigger space and more comfortable than the BE200. Pascan Aviation out of St. Hubert near Montreal used to do it to on occasions.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
single_swine_herder
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 627
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:35 pm

Re: Medevacs...with a Jetstream?

Post by single_swine_herder »

The issue may well be for the transfer of bariatric patients.

Many of these people simply can't fit into the Beech 200 class of aircraft. Therefore, a larger aircraft is required to extend healthcare to these citizens.

They have road ambulances similarly equipped.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Darkwing Duck
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 430
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:30 am

Re: Medevacs...with a Jetstream?

Post by Darkwing Duck »

single_swine_herder wrote:The issue may well be for the transfer of bariatric patients.

Many of these people simply can't fit into the Beech 200 class of aircraft. Therefore, a larger aircraft is required to extend healthcare to these citizens.

They have road ambulances similarly equipped.
Can't see this to be the reason. Isn't the door into the JS a bit higher than the KA? The medical team would have to lift the patient higher to get into the door. That is a lot of lifting. Plus would not the door of a 200 and a 31 be about the same width? Plus if anyone is getting bariatric surgery would they not have to arrange transport to the hospital themselves. This is not an emergency situation. My guess is they are just trying to utilize what they have in the fleet for a contract they just won. That is all. Make hay when the sun shines.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Kowalski: Sir, we may be out of fuel.
Skipper: What makes you think that?
Kowalski: We've lost engine one, and engine two is no longer on fire.
awitzke
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 511
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 3:06 pm
Location: Napping in Pikangikum

Re: Medevacs...with a Jetstream?

Post by awitzke »

Well they use metros for medi so the height I can't really see being an issue?
---------- ADS -----------
 
SuperchargedRS
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1485
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 1:30 am
Location: the stars playground

Re: Medevacs...with a Jetstream?

Post by SuperchargedRS »

PC12 seem to work rather well unless you need really long legs.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
single_swine_herder
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 627
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:35 pm

Re: Medevacs...with a Jetstream?

Post by single_swine_herder »

Automated loading system .... you don't lift a 450+ pounder into those aircraft.
---------- ADS -----------
 
SuperchargedRS
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1485
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 1:30 am
Location: the stars playground

Re: Medevacs...with a Jetstream?

Post by SuperchargedRS »

Wanna bet, it ain't pleasent but you're girth limited before weight in the PC12. Besides if you cant physically lift your pt with the man power you have on the ground, you shouldn't be loading them.
---------- ADS -----------
 
fish4life
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2562
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 6:32 am

Re: Medevacs...with a Jetstream?

Post by fish4life »

Metro's are high but they also use a winch to pull up a "sled" with the stretcher on it.
---------- ADS -----------
 
co-joe
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4770
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 2:33 am
Location: YYC 230 degree radial at about 10 DME

Re: Medevacs...with a Jetstream?

Post by co-joe »

It's just weird because the AB health medevac contract used to be worded so that you had to have a 200. Borek walked away from the contract in YYC rather than buy a 200 (they were using a 100). I can't see how AB health would pay more for a J31, but hey if it looks stupid and it works I guess it's not stupid.
---------- ADS -----------
 
ditar
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 407
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 1:09 pm
Location: This pale blue dot

Re: Medevacs...with a Jetstream?

Post by ditar »

Apparently it was a typo. Probably a cut-and-paste oversight. No medevac involved.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Bruce Dickenson
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 6:45 pm

Re: Medevacs...with a Jetstream?

Post by Bruce Dickenson »

ditar wrote:Apparently it was a typo. Probably a cut-and-paste oversight. No medevac involved.
I guess you can't expect much else from a The Scum Bag that runs this place now
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Pratt X 3
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 895
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 12:19 pm

Re: Medevacs...with a Jetstream?

Post by Pratt X 3 »

Wow, do I feel old. You guys seemed shocked that someone would use a Jetstream for medevacs. But not that long ago, a company based in YYZ called Samaritan used them for that very purpose. When they went out of business, a company called Paladin aka Advanced Air Ambulance used a couple of the same Jetstreams out of YTZ. I guess it has been more than 10 years since they've been around. I am getting old. Now get off my lawn!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Have Pratts - Will Travel
WASIE
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:16 pm

Re: Medevacs...with a Jetstream?

Post by WASIE »

:lol:
Bruce Dickenson wrote:
ditar wrote:Apparently it was a typo. Probably a cut-and-paste oversight. No medevac involved.
I guess you can't expect much else from a The Scum Bag that runs this place now
---------- ADS -----------
 
co-joe
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4770
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 2:33 am
Location: YYC 230 degree radial at about 10 DME

Re: Medevacs...with a Jetstream?

Post by co-joe »

I thought Paladin flew the Rice Rocket?
---------- ADS -----------
 
bobm
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 183
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 11:27 am

Re: Medevacs...with a Jetstream?

Post by bobm »

Paladin had a J31. Tried to do it out of Thunder Bay after YTZ. Didn't last too long though. Could not do gravel ops.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Redneck_pilot86
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1330
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: between 60 and 70

Re: Medevacs...with a Jetstream?

Post by Redneck_pilot86 »

Darkwing Duck wrote:
single_swine_herder wrote:The issue may well be for the transfer of bariatric patients.

Many of these people simply can't fit into the Beech 200 class of aircraft. Therefore, a larger aircraft is required to extend healthcare to these citizens.

They have road ambulances similarly equipped.
Can't see this to be the reason. Isn't the door into the JS a bit higher than the KA? The medical team would have to lift the patient higher to get into the door. That is a lot of lifting. Plus would not the door of a 200 and a 31 be about the same width? Plus if anyone is getting bariatric surgery would they not have to arrange transport to the hospital themselves. This is not an emergency situation. My guess is they are just trying to utilize what they have in the fleet for a contract they just won. That is all. Make hay when the sun shines.
These "bariatric medevacs" happen quite often. There was talk of the next Yukon medevac contract requiring a 1900 to do them. These people are far from the definition of healthy, so the medevacs for them certainly are emergency situations, albeit one that is somewhat predictable. Personally, I think if you manage to get to 450 lbs or more, you have some serious thinking to do about your life choices.
---------- ADS -----------
 
The only three things a wingman should ever say: 1. "Two's up" 2. "You're on fire" 3. "I'll take the fat one"
SuperchargedRS
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1485
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 1:30 am
Location: the stars playground

Re: Medevacs...with a Jetstream?

Post by SuperchargedRS »

Redneck_pilot86 wrote:
These "bariatric medevacs" happen quite often. There was talk of the next Yukon medevac contract requiring a 1900 to do them. These people are far from the definition of healthy, so the medevacs for them certainly are emergency situations, albeit one that is somewhat predictable. Personally, I think if you manage to get to 450 lbs or more, you have some serious thinking to do about your life choices.

This is why they should just be using PC12s or if they are scared of a single engine order some of the new PC24s.

Loading 400 pounders in a PC12 isn't a issue, well as long as you have proper ground personal to help, which you should have no matter.
---------- ADS -----------
 
co-joe
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4770
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 2:33 am
Location: YYC 230 degree radial at about 10 DME

Re: Medevacs...with a Jetstream?

Post by co-joe »

I did a fat-evac once where the fire department came out to help load. We had to wiggle the whole stretcher left, then right, and keep tucking fat rolls each time until he fit through the door of the 200. Seriously gross. I wore gloves, a mask, and a gown.

The story from North Manitoba was far worse. Supposedly the guy got soo fat they had to take one wall of his house off to extricate him. Then the flew him in a metro with the cargo door. They had to put him on a pallet and use a forklift to load him.
---------- ADS -----------
 
ditar
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 407
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 1:09 pm
Location: This pale blue dot

Re: Medevacs...with a Jetstream?

Post by ditar »

I've heard a story of a 737 combi being used for a bariatric medevac. The patient was allegedly transported while herc-strapped to a pallet.
---------- ADS -----------
 
rigpiggy
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2964
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:17 pm
Location: west to east and west again

Re: Medevacs...with a Jetstream?

Post by rigpiggy »

SuperchargedRS wrote:
Redneck_pilot86 wrote:
These "bariatric medevacs" happen quite often. There was talk of the next Yukon medevac contract requiring a 1900 to do them. These people are far from the definition of healthy, so the medevacs for them certainly are emergency situations, albeit one that is somewhat predictable. Personally, I think if you manage to get to 450 lbs or more, you have some serious thinking to do about your life choices.

This is why they should just be using PC12s or if they are scared of a single engine order some of the new PC24s.

Loading 400 pounders in a PC12 isn't a issue, well as long as you have proper ground personal to help, which you should have no matter.
Lets see used B1900 2.3m, new pc-24 is how much? Got to have either a really good rate for sitting on your ass all the time, or lots of flying. You can also use the hunnypot to carry more pax/cargo, and have available on say 4 hr stby
---------- ADS -----------
 
SuperchargedRS
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1485
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 1:30 am
Location: the stars playground

Re: Medevacs...with a Jetstream?

Post by SuperchargedRS »

In which case PC12 it
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
AOW
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 465
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 2:23 pm

Re: Medevacs...with a Jetstream?

Post by AOW »

SuperchargedRS wrote:In which case PC12 it
Some jurisdictions require a multi-turbine aircraft to perform work as an air ambulance. But fortunately there are a number of effective twin turboprops for the job; if you want a big door, you can get the King Air 200C or 350C, 1900 or a Metro, etc. Despite what certain misspelled fruit would have you believe, PC12 is not the only answer!
---------- ADS -----------
 
SuperchargedRS
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1485
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 1:30 am
Location: the stars playground

Re: Medevacs...with a Jetstream?

Post by SuperchargedRS »

AOW wrote:
SuperchargedRS wrote:In which case PC12 it
Some jurisdictions require a multi-turbine aircraft to perform work as an air ambulance. But fortunately there are a number of effective twin turboprops for the job; if you want a big door, you can get the King Air 200C or 350C, 1900 or a Metro, etc. Despite what certain misspelled fruit would have you believe, PC12 is not the only answer!
Single engine paranoia, gotta love it.

I'm just speaking as a pilatus medevac driver, and not for the fruit.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
AOW
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 465
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 2:23 pm

Re: Medevacs...with a Jetstream?

Post by AOW »

SuperchargedRS wrote: Single engine paranoia, gotta love it.

I'm just speaking as a pilatus medevac driver, and not for the fruit.
Having had a PT-6 fail in flight on me, I was very grateful to have a second one. I don't think anybody should be using the PC-12 for air ambulance over sparsely settled areas.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Employment Forum”