Certificate of Registration

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
helinas
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 367
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 11:32 am

Certificate of Registration

Post by helinas »

The name of an individual or the name of the company on a certificate of registration of an aircraft means that they are the sole owners of that particular aircraft.
If I lease an aircraft from ABC company the name on the C of R would read ABC company and not my own even though I am leasing it for a period of time.

I posed a question earlier regarding company A and company B owning, leasing and all that crap. If company A OWNS and also FLIES (operates) the airplane but the airplane is registered under company B because company A does not have the authority or certificate to fly does company B which did A the favour not get compensated for their troubles even though company A and company B are high school buddies.

I know fougapilot mentioned that company A owns the airplane and company B operates it but in this case company A owns it and also flies it but company B has registered it under their operating certificate, I guess they were both scratching each other's back.

And company A made a very good income from a contract to fly goods so does this mean that company B also gets paid or just some sort of management fee.

thanks guys.

Helinas
---------- ADS -----------
 
Aeros
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 375
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 6:20 am

Post by Aeros »

The C of R isn't about who owns the aircraft. The C of R identifies who has "custody and control" of the aircraft.
---------- ADS -----------
 
wallypilot
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1646
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 9:59 pm
Location: The Best Coast

Post by wallypilot »

That's exactly it. My company operates three aircraft for another company that actually owns the aircraft but has no interest in managing the aircraft. They are not aircraft operators and realise that we can do it more economically. Those three aircraft have my company's name on the CofR, despite the fact that our client is the actual owner. you can structure the agreements however you want in terms of sub leasing, charter, etc. In our case, these 3 aircraft are solely dedicated to the owner and we have no option to use them in any other endeavour.
---------- ADS -----------
 
helinas
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 367
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 11:32 am

Post by helinas »

What does "Custody and Control" really mean?

Decisions on maintenance, hours flown, etc.

The real owner pays for everything and the person that has "custody and control" has what?

thanks for the great info guys
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
aileron
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 394
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 11:53 pm

Post by aileron »

If A operates the aircraft that B owns then there are very specific items that the lease must state regarding who's operationaly in control. In addition to the normal CofR forms you will have to complete "Annex to Application for Registration of a Leased Aircraft". See: TC 26-0309

Item F is pretty clear regarding your paragraph 3 (A cannot own and "pilot" it while B holds the certificate - if that's what you meant).

As to who gets paid what, well that's a negotiated agreement of terms/conditions and that will depend on the relationship between A and B (does A just own it to lease or do they own it so they may use it?) Either way there will fixed and variable components.

--------------------

Custody and Control lies with the operator, the lease holder. The cost of the lease will likely be B's only responsibility (if A owns the aircraft and wants to be flown around in it under B's ticket). So B will likely lease the aircraft from B for one dollar.

The reason you want the Custody and Control with the lease holder is because they're ultimately responsible. If an accident happens it's their ass on the line, not A's. So, when it comes to maintenance, you want to be very clear between parties who makes the decisions. If A are a bunch of cheapskates and you didn't have this nailed down then B will either maintain to their standard and take it out as their own loss (financially) or become sloppy and lazy to certain items on the maintenance schedule (like maybe going into the realm of - "on condition" -YIKES).

So if you're B, make damn sure A will put up the cash for maintenance/improvements without poking their fingers all over the accounting ledgers.



edit to include previous post
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
hz2p
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1086
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 9:38 am

Post by hz2p »

.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by hz2p on Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
BTD
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1580
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 8:53 pm

Post by BTD »

Who would the aircraft be insured to just out of curiousity?

Owner or Operator. ( I would think Operator. Wouldn't it be more likely they be a fault for a claim than the owner?)
---------- ADS -----------
 
PITA
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 118
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 6:31 am
Location: sont

Post by PITA »

There are two definitions of OWNERS. "Care and Control" and "Legally OWN".

In TC eyes it is the person or company who has "care and control" of the aircraft and will be the name on the CofR. What makes it confusing is that TC calls it the OWNER on the CofR..

T.C. dosen't really care if an investment company "Legally OWNS" the product.

TC needs to have access to the company who's name is on the CofR so they can contact if there is an Airworthiness Directive or other instruction for continuied airworthiness.

PITA
---------- ADS -----------
 
grouchy
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 242
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 6:08 pm

Post by grouchy »

"company A owns the airplane and company B operates it but in this case company A owns it and also flies it but company B has registered it under their operating certificate."

If I'm reading the original post correctly, the airplane is on co B's OC but co A is operating it as a way of getting around getting its own OC. It doesn't sound right to me. Surely co B's personnel should be operating the AC. Is it splitting hairs?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Dust Devil
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4027
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 10:55 am
Location: Riderville

Post by Dust Devil »

BTD wrote:Who would the aircraft be insured to just out of curiousity?

Owner or Operator. ( I would think Operator. Wouldn't it be more likely they be a fault for a claim than the owner?)
The operator insures the aircraft however the owner is the one the cheque gets cut to in the event a claim is made.
---------- ADS -----------
 
helinas
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 367
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 11:32 am

Post by helinas »

Company A owns the airplane outright, A leases it to company B then company B goes ahead and leases it to company C.
Company A just found out that Company B leased it to Company C and Company A has never heard of Company C, WHAT HAPPENS NEXT !
Is anybody in trouble here.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Dust Devil
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4027
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 10:55 am
Location: Riderville

Post by Dust Devil »

helinas wrote:Company A owns the airplane outright, A leases it to company B then company B goes ahead and leases it to company C.
Company A just found out that Company B leased it to Company C and Company A has never heard of Company C, WHAT HAPPENS NEXT !
Is anybody in trouble here.
Depends on the lease agreement. Most lease agreements state that you will not sub lease the aircraft. If you do sublease the aircraft then you are in breach of contract. Enter lawyers.
---------- ADS -----------
 
//=S=//


A parent's only as good as their dumbest kid. If one wins a Nobel Prize but the other gets robbed by a hooker, you failed
TC Guy
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 552
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 10:27 am
Location: Canada
Contact:

Post by TC Guy »

Some good information here.

I have the good forturne to just ask the registration people here at TC and give you their answer.

If I lease the aircraft from you, we will have an agreement. Before you can register that aircraft, you will have to provide TC with a copy of that agreement (so TC knows who has control of the aircraft, AND who owns it).

Regarding sub-leasing... something I did not know: if your lease agreement says you can do it, then you may. If it does not say you can do it, or the agreement does not address that issue, then you will have to provide some paperwork from the owner or transport will not allow the sub-lease (by refusing to re-register the aircraft). Soo... everyone knows, including Transport.

If you have the aircraft registered, you have control over it, and bear any/all responsibility.

Also...

Commerically Registered
The entity must be Canadian, and 75% of the voting interests must be Canadian (I have heard this might change, but the nice people here did not know about that).


Privately Registered
Transport will allow a non-Canadian to own and reister a Canadian aircraft, but the owner must submit a "flight report" indicating that 60% of the flying is done in Canada every 6 months.

I am pretty sure I didn't butcher that too bad. :)

-TC Guy
---------- ADS -----------
 
helinas
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 367
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 11:32 am

Post by helinas »

Thanks TC Guy,

In my situtation the company or person that actually owned the aircraft which I will call A did not now that the aircraft was sub-leased from B to C company as company A thought he leased it to only B company.

What does Transport Canada have to say about that?

thanks again

Helinas
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”