Have some Kool-aid

Discuss topics relating to Westjet.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
Blastor
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 964
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:20 am
Location: North America

Have some Kool-aid

Post by Blastor »

No pay raise? No profit share? Stocks are down? Low morale?
HAve some Kool-aid and blame it on Fuel cost, or Air Canada, or the Fed's, or...........

WestJet tries to mitigate fuel costs

Joanne Lee-Young .CanWest News Service

Thursday, October 13, 2005

VANCOUVER -- The rising cost of fuel has hit net earnings hard at WestJet and the company is trying to keep airfares down, president and CEO Clive Beddoe said.

"We can control some of the other costs, but regrettably fuel used to be 18 per cent of the business. It is now 40 per cent," Beddoe told the Vancouver Board of Trade in a speech about the future of his low-cost airline. "We have offset some of this, but we haven't offset it sufficiently.

"We are trying to keep airfares down to keep people stimulated to travel," Beddoe said. "The incredible cost of fuel is a major, major challenge. It is extremely volatile, more so than you are seeing at the pumps. In August, we were paying 60 cents a litre. In September, 76 cents. Last week, it was 96 cents. That is a 50 per cent increase in basically 30 to 40 days so it is very hard to manage."

To cope, WestJet has tried several ways of making its fleet more fuel efficient: first, it has added eight-foot high winglets on the end of its airplanes. This "quite advanced technology reduces fuel burn by 3.5 per cent, which doesn't sound like much, but is a significant savings when you are paying $400 million on fuel a year," Beddoe said.

Also, it is aggressively retiring old planes. "The introduction of new airplanes is a significant part of our efforts to keep costs and airfares down. The net effect to us is about $60 million a year in savings," Beddoe said.

Beddoe said that while a fully loaded 737-200 plane at cruising altitude burns 3,200 to 3,600 pounds of fuel per engine per side, by comparison, a newer model 737-600 uses only about 1,900 pounds of fuel.

In 2005, WestJet added five new generation 737-800s, seven 737-700s, and three 737-600s. Next year, it is expecting delivery of ten new generation 737-600s and two 737-700s.

Once these new planes are in the air, Beddoe said it will "be all about utilization" and the company will turn up the number of hours per day that planes are in the air to further maximize their investment, which is about $40 million per plane.

Last week, while the proportion of available seats filled dipped for WestJet, Air Canada posted another monthly record for attracting travellers. At the time, Beddoe responded that it was a reflection of the market still absorbing capacity that WestJet is adding.

Beddoe said airfares could be shaved if airport authorities changed the structure of their landing charges. They could "differentiate the cost of landing an airplane per the time of takeoff and the time of landing. If that were done, you would see that the fixed cost of an airport could be spread over that many more flights. A classic example of this would be using the bridge. We are on the bridge for about half an hour, but we get charged same amount as, say, Air Canada that sits on the bridge for an hour and a half. That seems inequitable to me and hopefully we can see airports change this attitude ... and thereby bring down some of the cost to the consumer."

Some industry watchers expect Ottawa may change its policy of limiting foreign ownership in Canadian airlines to just 25 per cent, by lifting it to 49 per cent. This would pave the way for foreign investment dollars at a time when airlines, especially small ones, in Canada are not only battling fuel prices and stiff competition, but trying to expand.


Beddoe, however, showed lukewarm interest in any such change and thinks the industry has already taken care of that problem. At the end of August, WestJet joined other airlines including Air Canada and Transat in creating a dual-share structure so that variable shares could be held by non-Canadian owners and counted as one vote unless the total number of foreign-held shares exceeds 25 per cent of total common shares. This allows "foreigners (to) buy our shares and get different, flexible voting rights so that we stay within that 25 per cent. Quite frankly, I don't think that going to 49 per cent is a big issue."

The Daily News
:twisted:
---------- ADS -----------
 
195psi
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 113
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 5:01 am

Post by 195psi »

Your a nut job. I think someone put something in your Kool-aid. If there is anyone that tries perpetuate propaganda and twist a benign news story it's you.Grow up.At leats I hope grow up is appropriate.I'm hoping for your sake your a 14 year old kid. If not, you lead a very sad internet searching life.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
leftyxl
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 176
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 6:01 pm
Location: base of the mountain

Post by leftyxl »

Just remeber Blastor, even if your mother didn't Jesus Loves you.
---------- ADS -----------
 
"Hey pile it, you wanna hold my bottle?"
User avatar
Sulako
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 2401
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 8:01 pm

Post by Sulako »

You can do better than that article, can't you? Just make stuff up that actually implicates them in some kind of scandal.

"Carrier burns fuel - forces price to rise for remaining supply"

"WJ caused Katrina due to wake turbulence on new winglets"

or even

"WJ grows, and so the does rate of devil worship amongst teens. Possibly linked?"

It seems to me like they are anticipating this and doing everything they can to stay ahead of the game. It's not like they are some bloated semi-monopoly that only reacts to it's environment once the damage has been done. Of course I'm speaking of the Liberals... ;)

Have a good weekend, Mr. Blastor, sir :)
---------- ADS -----------
 
Flightlevels
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 703
Joined: Sun Feb 29, 2004 7:16 pm

Post by Flightlevels »

Thought it was a positive article. It shows what this company is managed like on the day to day basis. We are doing everything possible to overcome the fuel issue and the main thing is all the employees are pulling in the same direction. The days of cheap fuel are gone. Good spin though!! :P
---------- ADS -----------
 
Trickkles
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 131
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 5:16 pm

Post by Trickkles »

I have to agree with Flightlevels. I thought it was positive article.

But just a quick question:

Why do you think Beddoe is 'luke-warm' to raising the foreign investment levels? I think if managed closely it would be a real asset for WJ.

Just wondering....
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rebel
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1552
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:43 pm

Post by Rebel »

Hi Trickkles

Actually I think Clive is right on the share ownership issue as the only folks willing to step up to the plate are the US hedge funds. Basically AT and AC are at odds with the US hedge funds at the present time as the hedge funds want both companies to purchase their own shares or in effect return most of their cash surplus to the shareholders. That’s why the hedge funds make out like bandits. In this business I think I’d rather have my company sitting on a pile of cash or at the very least re-invest it in the infrastructure…. :D

Cheers
---------- ADS -----------
 
Blastor
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 964
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:20 am
Location: North America

Post by Blastor »

all the employees are pulling in the same direction
really? You haven't been in the office for a while, haven't you :twisted:
---------- ADS -----------
 
CanadaEH
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 962
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Tuktoyuktuk

Post by CanadaEH »

really? You haven't been in the office for a while, haven't you
You haven't been on earth for a while, haven't you?

If you are so "in-the-know" why don't you get those unions to hurry up and unionize Westjet? You know damn well that won't happen anytime soon and we've got a long way to go before morale at Westjet turns Air Canada on us and employee relations really turn sour. The reality is that a few bad quarters, no profit share, and a stagnant share price does hit home to some employees but for anyone smart with their money they know that a few good quarters will bring back profit sharing and help our share price rise. Denial only goes so far, Blastor........
---------- ADS -----------
 
Canus Chinookus
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 707
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:30 pm

Post by Canus Chinookus »

I have to say CanadaEh, that icon of yours still makes me smile.

As for Clive being lukewarm, is it possible that 49% ownership may help out AC more that it would WJ?

My hat's off to the forum troll, at least he posted an article that's up to date... :roll:
---------- ADS -----------
 
Ryan Coke
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 142
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 10:05 am

Post by Ryan Coke »

From what I heard, and what he alluded to in the article........

Now that WS, AC, and AT have all introduced the variable voting shares for foreign investment, it has for all intents and purposes circumvented the current 25% limit.

Basically the new share class allows an unlimited amount of foreign investment, but restricts the voting control to the 25% maximum. From what I understand :shock: .
---------- ADS -----------
 
CanadaEH
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 962
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Tuktoyuktuk

Post by CanadaEH »

Hey Canus, stay tuned for an update.. :supz:
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “WestJet”