runway hold short markings

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
pelmet
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 7955
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:48 pm

runway hold short markings

Post by pelmet »

Remember how the AIP told us that for instrument runways there was a double solid and double broken line and that it was a single solid and single broken line for a non-instrument runway(although gravel runways have neither of course). A while back the AIP deleted the reference for the non-instrument runway. Now there is only a diagram for an instrument runway. So what kind of markings are there for a non-instrument runway?
Was this deleted because there are so many little airports without markings that are shown in the AIM?
---------- ADS -----------
 
CARO
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 69
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 9:02 am

Post by CARO »

I don't think the markings have changed. I don't think that just cuz the AIP changed their info, every airport operator went out and repainted their taxiway markings. Although it does make you wonder why they did that in the AIP.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Dust Devil
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4027
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 10:55 am
Location: Riderville

Post by Dust Devil »

Probably because having special markings for an non insturment runway is silly. If it has different markings then what an insturment runway is supposed to have then it is not an insturment runway. They could paint happy faces across it and you should be able to figure that it's a non insturment runway.
---------- ADS -----------
 
xsbank
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5655
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: "The Coast"

Post by xsbank »

Wasn't there some fussing recently about the 200' rule - you were required to hold 200' short of an active runway, until somebody pointed out that at some airports the line would be off the airport? And some lines (like at YBL) were nowhere near 200'?
---------- ADS -----------
 
"What's it doing now?"
"Fly low and slow and throttle back in the turns."
captain_v1.0
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 12:47 pm
Location: Right now?

Post by captain_v1.0 »

I heard a few weeks ago that 72 major aiports in the US are to get new hold short markings to reduce the number of runway incursions.

http://www.airportbusiness.com/article/ ... eSection=4

I like their idea, add a centerline as you approach the hold position. Just like most airports that already have a taxiway centerline as you approach the runway, what's the point?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rubberbiscuit
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 754
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:02 pm

Post by Rubberbiscuit »

IFR,VFR,CAT I, CAT II............I say we all do like certain unnamed carriers from Asia do in Anchorage..........Land and take-off on the taxiways, get rid of "taxiways" as we know it......make it a free for all. The need for hold short markings would vanish all together.
---------- ADS -----------
 
"Nearly all safety regulations are based upon lessons which have been paid for in blood by those who attempted what you are contemplating" Tony Kern
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”