Blue Water Aviation plane down North of Winnipeg
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore
Blue Water Aviation plane down North of Winnipeg
Plane clipped a tree with 3 on board then sank in the water.
https://winnipeg.ctvnews.ca/mobile/plan ... -1.4657007
https://winnipeg.ctvnews.ca/mobile/plan ... -1.4657007
Re: Blue Water Aviation plane down North of Winnipeg
Underwater recovery team. That does not sound good 

As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
Re: Blue Water Aviation plane down North of Winnipeg
I hope everyone is alright, the water is down into the high 40’s low 50’s this time of year and it won’t take much for hypothermia to be an issue.
Re: Blue Water Aviation plane down North of Winnipeg
CBC reports a witness saw a wing "...come off".
Good judgment comes from experience. Experience often comes from bad judgment.
Re: Blue Water Aviation plane down North of Winnipeg
Not that warm. Lake temps are about 6 degrees celsius (43 fahrenheit) and those small lakes are cooling off fast with daily air temperatures around 0 celsius.
You are right that hypothermia will set in fast.
-
- Rank 1
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 8:16 pm
Re: Blue Water Aviation plane down North of Winnipeg
Was up there Friday and the small shallow lakes had ice on them.
Re: Blue Water Aviation plane down North of Winnipeg
Any word on if it was a rescue or recovery?
Re: Blue Water Aviation plane down North of Winnipeg
Unfortunately it’s a recovery
You Can Love An Airplane All You Want, But Remember, It Will Never Love You Back!
Re: Blue Water Aviation plane down North of Winnipeg
Contrary to the news article no trees were hit on approach. It was a inflight breakup.
Re: Blue Water Aviation plane down North of Winnipeg
The Otter has had issues in the past with wing separation and fatigue on structural areas. I'm sure the maintenance and inspection records will be the first area to look into.
Re: Blue Water Aviation plane down North of Winnipeg
This is (unofficially) the 5th (on record)
2 in 1956. First suspected wake turbulence, the other inadvertent rapid full flap retraction
1 in the 70's, unknown cause
1 in 2013, black sheep, determined excessive over speed on high percentage of flights
While the tail has had its issues, it doesn't seem like in flight break ups are a known issue or weak spot with the Otter
2 in 1956. First suspected wake turbulence, the other inadvertent rapid full flap retraction
1 in the 70's, unknown cause
1 in 2013, black sheep, determined excessive over speed on high percentage of flights
While the tail has had its issues, it doesn't seem like in flight break ups are a known issue or weak spot with the Otter
I guess I should write something here.
Re: Blue Water Aviation plane down North of Winnipeg
One recovered. Divers still looking for two. Confirmed by those on scene in flight breakup
-
- Top Poster
- Posts: 8132
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:25 pm
- Location: Winterfell...
Re: Blue Water Aviation plane down North of Winnipeg
Turbine Otters cruise at Vne. Can’t exactly be healthy for the airframe.
Geez did I say that....? Or just think it....?
-
- Rank 7
- Posts: 639
- Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 5:17 pm
- Location: The Okanagan
Re: Blue Water Aviation plane down North of Winnipeg
"...cruise at Vne…"
We had a company Twotter years ago; I seem to remember we lumbered along about 140-150 knots.
We had a company Twotter years ago; I seem to remember we lumbered along about 140-150 knots.
-
- Rank 7
- Posts: 719
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 10:45 pm
- Location: Somewhere rocky or salty.
Re: Blue Water Aviation plane down North of Winnipeg
The current Vne's are the former top of the green arc. Vne used to be 192 on wheels, 183 on floats.iflyforpie wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 8:22 pm Turbine Otters cruise at Vne. Can’t exactly be healthy for the airframe.
You could also correctly say they cruise just a few mph above Va.
"I don't know which is worse, ...that everyone has his price, or that the price is always so low." - Calvin (of Calvin and Hobbes)
-
- Rank 7
- Posts: 538
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 7:52 pm
Re: Blue Water Aviation plane down North of Winnipeg
According to the CCAR they have 3 turbine and 2 piston Otters.
AP
AP
Re: Blue Water Aviation plane down North of Winnipeg
Not sure how many operators do that knowing it’s weaknesses. We run at 144/134mph for wheels and floats.iflyforpie wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 8:22 pm Turbine Otters cruise at Vne. Can’t exactly be healthy for the airframe.
I guess I should write something here.
Re: Blue Water Aviation plane down North of Winnipeg
I beg to differ. With presumably 2 in a period of less than 10 years, it would be appear to be a cause for concern, especially considering the air-frames are continuing to age. I'd bet Viking is sweating blood at the moment.Maynard wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 11:48 am This is (unofficially) the 5th (on record)
2 in 1956. First suspected wake turbulence, the other inadvertent rapid full flap retraction
1 in the 70's, unknown cause
1 in 2013, black sheep, determined excessive over speed on high percentage of flights
While the tail has had its issues, it doesn't seem like in flight break ups are a known issue or weak spot with the Otter
-
- Rank 10
- Posts: 2362
- Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:24 am
Re: Blue Water Aviation plane down North of Winnipeg
IIRC, the Garrett engine conversion doesn't move the airspeed redline in the same manner as the PT-6 conversions. It leads to some operators cruising around all day every day at 160mph, well into the yellow airspeed range.
The accountant is quite happy all summer long with getting extra trips done. The sheet metal guys are also quite happy when they take that extra profit repairing cracks and fatigue damage in the tail during the off-season.
Just because the tail hasn't fallen off, doesn't mean it's not a problem. There's a lot of structural work being done to some aircraft in the off-season, especially the ones with the bigger up-gross kits.
I'd also agree that 5 structural failures in a production run of less than 500 aircraft isn't a good sign. Look at it this way, more than 1% of the aircraft produced have fallen apart in flight. If it were the 172, we'd have 440 airplanes. If it were the 737, we'd have 106 airplanes.
I'd say it's time to get some serious attention on this. Either it's being operated incorrectly, there's a design weakness, or the airframe isn't ageing well with now 50-60 year old airplanes.
The accountant is quite happy all summer long with getting extra trips done. The sheet metal guys are also quite happy when they take that extra profit repairing cracks and fatigue damage in the tail during the off-season.
Just because the tail hasn't fallen off, doesn't mean it's not a problem. There's a lot of structural work being done to some aircraft in the off-season, especially the ones with the bigger up-gross kits.
I'd also agree that 5 structural failures in a production run of less than 500 aircraft isn't a good sign. Look at it this way, more than 1% of the aircraft produced have fallen apart in flight. If it were the 172, we'd have 440 airplanes. If it were the 737, we'd have 106 airplanes.
I'd say it's time to get some serious attention on this. Either it's being operated incorrectly, there's a design weakness, or the airframe isn't ageing well with now 50-60 year old airplanes.
Re: Blue Water Aviation plane down North of Winnipeg
If you drove a Tesla at 150 mph in the snow and hit a pole, should you be concerned about the safety of the car?? Black sheep didn't operate the otter properly. That same plane also hit a snow bank with the back end just prior to the accident flight. It wasn't just a "plane fell apart for no reason" crash....If it turns out that there were no contributing factors and the latest one just fell apart, then I would be concerned.Mick G wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 5:56 amI beg to differ. With presumably 2 in a period of less than 10 years, it would be appear to be a cause for concern, especially considering the air-frames are continuing to age. I'd bet Viking is sweating blood at the moment.Maynard wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 11:48 am This is (unofficially) the 5th (on record)
2 in 1956. First suspected wake turbulence, the other inadvertent rapid full flap retraction
1 in the 70's, unknown cause
1 in 2013, black sheep, determined excessive over speed on high percentage of flights
While the tail has had its issues, it doesn't seem like in flight break ups are a known issue or weak spot with the Otter
I guess I should write something here.
-
- Rank 3
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 2:33 pm
- Location: YYZ
Re: Blue Water Aviation plane down North of Winnipeg
BWA has Walter/GE engines on their Otters and they’re not operating with that 9000 pound upgross or whatever it is.
I worked there for two summers. Very sad to hear this and my heart goes out to everyone involved.
I worked there for two summers. Very sad to hear this and my heart goes out to everyone involved.
Re: Blue Water Aviation plane down North of Winnipeg
I fly both the PT6 and Garrett conversions. They are very similar in limitation. PT6 is max 134mph on floats and 144mph wheels, Garrett if I recall is limited at 136mph floats 146mph wheels. Regardless it's very tragic and hits home.
Re: Blue Water Aviation plane down North of Winnipeg
There is enough to go wrong in aviation , without having to worry about airframe failure.... this needs attention.
Re: Blue Water Aviation plane down North of Winnipeg
There but for the grace of God, go I.