Typical in the day of social media and news media opinion and not reporting news accurately. News is dead and opinion gets ratings and people are mislead. NG at 30000 Cycles is now and old aircraft and should be subject to aging aircraft maintenence. Greta might be happy, news media scaring people out of the skies. NG is approaching 20 years. According to present day values and thinking they should be scraped and replaced and still maintain cheap tickets. I'm thinking rename Max to 5G - lmfaoooooooo
The pickle forks are kind of a big deal since they hold the wings on. 30,000 cycles is not a lot for a 737 or any aircraft and well below its design life. More unintended consequences of adding a new wing and winglets to a 50 year old design.
The pickle forks are kind of a big deal since they hold the wings on. 30,000 cycles is not a lot for a 737 or any aircraft and well below its design life. More unintended consequences of adding a new wing and winglets to a 50 year old design.
737 wings are so floppy anyways. They bounce up and down like three feet when just taxiing around!
737 wings are so floppy anyways. They bounce up and down like three feet when just taxiing around!
Trolling are we? That wins the most retarded statement of the year, hands down. watch a B52 takeoff and see what wing flex is really like.
WestJet had a 737 with more than 100k flight hours on it. Don't know if they still do. I'm just saying a 737 probably flies more than a B-52. I would hope anyways.
WestJet also had a 737 with 97k cycles on it. I'd imagine it's the cycles that get you not the hours. Remember the Hawaiian 737 convertible. It had 89k cycles.
Victory wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 7:44 am
WestJet also had a 737 with 97k cycles on it. I'd imagine it's the cycles that get you not the hours. Remember the Hawaiian 737 convertible. It had 89k cycles.
That was a 737-200 and she was scraped when the 737NG's came on line.
WestJet had a 737 with more than 100k flight hours on it. Don't know if they still do. I'm just saying a 737 probably flies more than a B-52. I would hope anyways.
I suggest you google the B52 - i doubt any 73 will see almost a hundred years service. They project the B52 to be in flying in active duty for at least another 20 years being intrigued in the 50's. Yes they will have low cycles compared to airframe time but still amazing and likely better built. When airbus introduced the 320 and Boeing the NG the reaction of the "classic" pilots of the time is that it was the opening of the era of "disposable aircraft" meaning a lot less service life than before. Built like a brick shit house was gone.
Comparing a b52 to an airline 737 is like comparing grandmas Buick doing 5k / year to a cab drivers Prius putting on 50k / year. Sure the Buick might last longer from a calendar point of view but that doesn’t mean it’s built better or more reliable.
The one underlying fact is that the airline industry has a long list of design flaws other than pilot brain farts. After the trip of airframe discovery starting with the comet to crews not understanding swept back wings and jet upset.
Airbus has had it's share as well, both airframe and software to Boeing, Douglas and Lockheed. One hopes that there is an end to this but as new aircraft are developed there is always that area of the unknown.
The irony I find in the 73max is the system perceived to help pilots and possibly aid due to erosion of skills due to automation (btw the whole world is dumbing down - look at new cars) ends up in major disasters. The only solution I see is more time , oversight and testing of new aircraft. It would be interesting to know how many flight hours on the max before given green light for consumer consumption. They must also be able to program a simulator to run through any and all conceived software faults. Debugging is a the major problem of everything today, damn why an I getting so many software updates on all my devices. I know the bad guys are always picking away trying to get my money but the issues remain. Will it ever be fixed or will corporations just factor law suits into cost of doing business. Seems a handful of money fixes a lot.