YC87DRVR wrote: ↑Sat Oct 16, 2021 5:31 am
ALPApolicy wrote: ↑Sat Oct 16, 2021 4:16 am
YC87DRVR wrote: ↑Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:22 amWhile I would love for it to come to fruition, a part of me thinks management actually enjoys giving us these carrots and then taking them away, just because they can and covid will certainly still be around and a valid reason to exercise that clause.
Which part of you thinks this? The sociopath part?
Seriously, there are people within WJ tasked with negotiations and they have a goal of saving $$$ but I don't honestly believe they have a desire to cause suffering.
Well firstly, many years of experiences has led me to believe they enjoy exercising those clauses, but they do so strategically not to cause “suffering” as you said.
Secondly, you should google the definition of a Secondly and then google another insult to use towards me that actually works in this context.
so·ci·o·path
/ˈsōsēōˌpaTH/
Learn to pronounce
noun
a person with a personality disorder manifesting itself in extreme antisocial attitudes and behavior and a lack of conscience.
My point, and perhaps it was a bit obscure, was that you are accusing some people at WJ, who you group under the all encompassing term of "management" of being sociopathic in their behaviour. It has been my observation that we often see in others what we ourselves experience or exhibit. For a
Qyou to see sociopathic behaviour in a nameless group of people, I wondered if the part of you that views the world through that lens is sociopathic or unable to experience empathy for the suffering of others.
To address your first paragraph 1, what exactly in your many years of experience leads you to believe that this group of people enjoys causing suffering to a group of people? Laying people off inevitability leads to suffering for some.
And I wouldn't call it an insult. My original post asked a question.