Now the Vax effects menstrual periods

[BE02 Driver]

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abm7201

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/15/well ... riods.html

Just wait till they announce that it affected pregnancies, even though they declared it safe for pregnant women despite exactly zero clinical testing. (Yeah, I said it!!!! Pregnant WOMEN......,)

But fear not!!!! The same experts say there is no cause for alarm. Nothing to see here......

[DonTomas]

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abm7201

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/15/well ... riods.html

Just wait till they announce that it affected pregnancies, even though they declared it safe for pregnant women despite exactly zero clinical testing. (Yeah, I said it!!!! Pregnant WOMEN......,)

But fear not!!!! The same experts say there is no cause for alarm. Nothing to see here......

We haven’t seen nothing yet. Wait till they find out how many young kids became sterile from the jab..evil plan, even dumber parents.

[CpnCrunch]

Says a web survey. The only actual RCT on this subject found that menstrual period was changed by under 1 day by the vaccine. So, overall it doesn't really sound like the end of the world. What does the infection itself do?

[DonTomas]

Says a web survey. The only actual RCT on this subject found that menstrual period was changed by under 1 day by the vaccine. So, overall it doesn't really sound like the end of the world. What does the infection itself do?

You’re in denial bud.

[BigQ]

The pregnancy effect study "proving" that it was safe and effective for pregnant women came from a study of approx 3,000 women who stated they were pregnant, at various points of progress in their pregnancy. Most were 1st trimester.

However, the final results excluded so many participants that only 117 participants and their results was used to prove its' safety profile. A few of these 117 reported miscarriage or stillbirth, about in-line with the "accepted ratio" of 13% of pregnancies that miscarry or ends in stillborn fetus.

What happened to the other 2800 or so pregnant women? Big Pharma is notorious for cherry-picking and curating results.


In the end, the study was pulled 4 months after it came out, and since, there are 0 studies proving the safety profile of the mrna vaccines on pregnant women.

[BE02 Driver]

The pregnancy effect study "proving" that it was safe and effective for pregnant women came from a study of approx 3,000 women who stated they were pregnant, at various points of progress in their pregnancy. Most were 1st trimester.

However, the final results excluded so many participants that only 117 participants and their results was used to prove its' safety profile. A few of these 117 reported miscarriage or stillbirth, about in-line with the "accepted ratio" of 13% of pregnancies that miscarry or ends in stillborn fetus.

What happened to the other 2800 or so pregnant women? Big Pharma is notorious for cherry-picking and curating results.


In the end, the study was pulled 4 months after it came out, and since, there are 0 studies proving the safety profile of the mrna vaccines on pregnant women.

Yes, I'm well aware of that study. The other interesting point is that months after it was amended, then removed all together for the reasons you mentioned it was still quoted in several provincial information packages as proof the vaccine was safe for pregnant women.

[albertdesalvo]

they declared it safe for pregnant women despite exactly zero clinical testing.

Boy, I don't know. It could result in this...

canvas.png (130.65 KiB) Viewed 1243 times

[Aviatard]

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abm7201

What else should I know about this research?

The nature of this survey means that we cannot compare the incidence of different experiences here with the general population (meaning, 40% of this sample having an experience does not mean that is the rate of that experience out in the world). The associations described here are not causal but provide evidence to better study these trends further. We emphasize that menstrual bleeding changes of this nature are generally not indicative of changes to fertility.