Easiest "No" Vote to Come to this pilot group to date
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog
-
- Rank 3
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 10:12 am
Re: Easiest "No" Vote to Come to this pilot group to date
Lenaumade, please stop posting your rhetoric. You keep saying the same thing and your english is horrible.
Re: Easiest "No" Vote to Come to this pilot group to date
What date is the actual vote? When will the results be published?
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-
- Rank 3
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2022 11:35 am
Re: Easiest "No" Vote to Come to this pilot group to date
Vote is ongoing ends I think on the 11th. Results posted typically within a few hours of close.
-
- Rank 8
- Posts: 846
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 3:50 pm
Re: Easiest "No" Vote to Come to this pilot group to date
That’s how you can tell he’s from YUL!BlueSkies12 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 03, 2022 10:17 am Lenaumade, please stop posting your rhetoric. You keep saying the same thing and your english is horrible.
Re: Easiest "No" Vote to Come to this pilot group to date
It is not going to 85 instead of 80.lenaumade wrote: ↑Sun Oct 02, 2022 1:18 pm Selfish....The deal is clearly to get rid of the flatpay for new hire and ease the transition to the jazz guy but in exchange other pilot will have to have a 85 dbm instead of 80. You do not want to do it because you don t have anything to gain out of it. You would not make this permanent gain for new hire because your conditions will not improve....isn't that Selfish ?
It is going to 85 DBM every month rather than surging to 88 in the summer and less in other months.
It is going up 24 hours max per year (996 to 1020).
If you take the average wide body day to be 8 hours then that equates to 3 extra working days per year.
If you take the average wide body day to be 12 hours then that equates to 2 extra working days per year.
And they are paid days.
Re: Easiest "No" Vote to Come to this pilot group to date
PostmasterGeneral wrote: ↑Mon Oct 03, 2022 12:23 pmThat’s how you can tell he’s from YUL!BlueSkies12 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 03, 2022 10:17 am Lenaumade, please stop posting your rhetoric. You keep saying the same thing and your english is horrible.
In twenty years time when your kids ask how you got into flying you want to be able to say "work and determination" not "I just kept taking money from your grandparents for type ratings until someone was stupid enough to give me a job"
-
- Rank 3
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2022 11:35 am
Re: Easiest "No" Vote to Come to this pilot group to date
Average WB days are closer to like 5 hours TAFB. Also the 88 "surge" is very limited, it can't be every fleet and every year. The 85 is a major increase in hours worked, and will decreased the amount of jobs required to man the fleet. Big no.2Shoes wrote: ↑Mon Oct 03, 2022 12:41 pmIt is not going to 85 instead of 80.lenaumade wrote: ↑Sun Oct 02, 2022 1:18 pm Selfish....The deal is clearly to get rid of the flatpay for new hire and ease the transition to the jazz guy but in exchange other pilot will have to have a 85 dbm instead of 80. You do not want to do it because you don t have anything to gain out of it. You would not make this permanent gain for new hire because your conditions will not improve....isn't that Selfish ?
It is going to 85 DBM every month rather than surging to 88 in the summer and less in other months.
It is going up 24 hours max per year (996 to 1020).
If you take the average wide body day to be 8 hours then that equates to 3 extra working days per year.
If you take the average wide body day to be 12 hours then that equates to 2 extra working days per year.
And they are paid days.
Re: Easiest "No" Vote to Come to this pilot group to date
I'll never vote yes for cargo wet leases while our pilots are at 90% salary. I'll never vote yes for Scope lets ever.
Re: Easiest "No" Vote to Come to this pilot group to date
Alti,
Obviously you've been drinking the cALPA Kool aid. I hope you're happy screwing our junior pilots. Nice.
- schnitzel2k3
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1456
- Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 11:17 pm
Re: Easiest "No" Vote to Come to this pilot group to date
This should be a no because you are in no position to strike, therefore the AC pilot group has ZERO leverage in this negotiation. Your reos are quite literally feeding you bullshit. You are taking what is minimally ok for you and very good for management.
Wait until there is a true threat and come at them for everything you lost. Flat pay is the scourge of the industry, but anyone who actively signed on at flat pay can wait a little longer so you guys can really make a difference.
Flat pay abolished, straight to formula.
Come together, right now, over this!
Wait until there is a true threat and come at them for everything you lost. Flat pay is the scourge of the industry, but anyone who actively signed on at flat pay can wait a little longer so you guys can really make a difference.
Flat pay abolished, straight to formula.
Come together, right now, over this!
Re: Easiest "No" Vote to Come to this pilot group to date
BlueSkies12, Please tell them to stop saying their rhetoric and I'll promise, I'll do the same. And no problem for my English, would you like to go on in French?BlueSkies12 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 03, 2022 10:17 am Lenaumade, please stop posting your rhetoric. You keep saying the same thing and your english is horrible.
And it seems you understood my "rhetoric" pretty well
Re: Easiest "No" Vote to Come to this pilot group to date
I'm usually a lurker. But I had to pipe up on this. I'm curious what wide body at AC averages 5 hours "Time Away From Base"? Maybe I'm confused what TAFB means. Maybe you're confused. We might all be confused.negative_g wrote: ↑Mon Oct 03, 2022 12:57 pmAverage WB days are closer to like 5 hours TAFB. Also the 88 "surge" is very limited, it can't be every fleet and every year. The 85 is a major increase in hours worked, and will decreased the amount of jobs required to man the fleet. Big no.2Shoes wrote: ↑Mon Oct 03, 2022 12:41 pmIt is not going to 85 instead of 80.lenaumade wrote: ↑Sun Oct 02, 2022 1:18 pm Selfish....The deal is clearly to get rid of the flatpay for new hire and ease the transition to the jazz guy but in exchange other pilot will have to have a 85 dbm instead of 80. You do not want to do it because you don t have anything to gain out of it. You would not make this permanent gain for new hire because your conditions will not improve....isn't that Selfish ?
It is going to 85 DBM every month rather than surging to 88 in the summer and less in other months.
It is going up 24 hours max per year (996 to 1020).
If you take the average wide body day to be 8 hours then that equates to 3 extra working days per year.
If you take the average wide body day to be 12 hours then that equates to 2 extra working days per year.
And they are paid days.
Re: Easiest "No" Vote to Come to this pilot group to date
You must mean the ones so junior they're still at Jazz. Because as a junior AC pilot this MOA does not benefit me.
-
- Rank 7
- Posts: 637
- Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:15 pm
Re: Easiest "No" Vote to Come to this pilot group to date
Who of the MEC or LEC sycophants might you be?
"Screwing the Junior Pilots". How? By protecting them from this nasty dump of an MOU? They will have to live with the consequences far longer that you or I ever will. Or are you really just looking out for yourself at their direct expense. If so, you should be ashamed. But I'll bet you sleep just fine at night. You guys have been screwing the group for years.
One last "hail Mary" before you get pitched in the dumpster of history.
Re: Easiest "No" Vote to Come to this pilot group to date
Funny to see how during TA1 and subsequent 10 yrs deal where 4 yrs flat pay was sold as a "win", we didn't negotiate for the unborn when management was trying to shave a few off bucks off pilot pay
Now that there is a pilot supply issue and known pay problem causing recruitment issues, suddenly there is great concern for junior pilots
The pot calling the kettle black
-
- Rank 1
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2022 5:09 pm
Re: Easiest "No" Vote to Come to this pilot group to date
This did not age well...Lt. Daniel Kaffee wrote: ↑Sun Jul 04, 2021 1:12 pm600 furloughed out of 4200...14 or 15%
What percentage of Jazz pilots were laid off?
What percentage of Air Transat pilots were laid off?
What percentage of Sunwing pilots were laid off?
What percentage of Porter pilots were laid off?
What percentage of Westjet pilots were laid off?
What percentage of Westjet Encore pilots were laid off?
Maybe stop hitting your head against the wall and realize how good most AC pilots have had it.
Senior management have stated that had they known how long Covid was going to last they would have furloughed 3000 pilots.
Does it suck to be furloughed...it sure does. But the epidemic has nothing to do with AC or ACPA.
They laid off 600 and are now looking for training flexibility so they can catch up
Imagine if they laid off 3000...lol
Well done with the propoganda Lt Dan
Re: Easiest "No" Vote to Come to this pilot group to date
I think "junior pilots" are smarter than that. They see this is only a brief gain in return for a career of concessions.
They see that we are leaving money behind here. Flat pay will be fixed imminently, it's a priority for this group, it's a necessity for the company, BUT THIS ISN'T THE DEAL TO DO IT
Let's get a good deal, not this POS.
Air Canada needs a deal on this. They'll come back to the table.
Remember the take it or leave it deal for Aeroplan? Smart money got up and walked out - and they had zero leverage - Rovinescu returned with another $125 million and then some.
The Transat deal fell through because of Covid, but remember that one? Shareholders were waffling with PKP, or the other group of investors trying to challenge the deal. AC upped their offer by 50% to get the result they wanted.
This is business. AC management are so used to ACPA just accepting every POS they toss out, and this is one of them, that they don't have to make a good deal. That they force us to quid pro quo contract clause with unknown levels of risk ot blowback.
And we're relying on Jalmer Johnson? This guy reminds me of Biden up there, at some points he was providing non-sequitur answers. He spent more time talking about what he did 40 years ago than this deal.
The AC guns must have a chuckle when they walk in with our negots team:
We got a chair and another pilot who has only ever given the company concessions since their involvement, neither of them could provide anything in their resume of relevance when asked, we got Lionel Hutz heading up our LRD, we got Brandon, I mean Jalmer Johnson...
Is it any wonder that we're getting the losing deal?
20 years of concrssions and counting.
Time to stop the slide. Send this back and get a good deal.
Re: Easiest "No" Vote to Come to this pilot group to date
You mean like when we turned down the TA and got FOS? You never learn. Go back and check our discussions. Your predictions are wrong and your character assessments are wrong too.
You and the p4c are misleading the junior pilots and playing on their emotions.
-
- Rank 3
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:46 pm
Re: Easiest "No" Vote to Come to this pilot group to date
Over simplification and revisionist history at its finest. The two bargaining situations are not even close to comparable. The only thing that is the same is that the MEC/NC blindsided the membership with a poor deal and the membership doesn’t like it.Ratherbe wrote: ↑Tue Oct 04, 2022 8:54 amYou mean like when we turned down the TA and got FOS? You never learn. Go back and check our discussions. Your predictions are wrong and your character assessments are wrong too.
You and the p4c are misleading the junior pilots and playing on their emotions.
-Jimmy
Re: Easiest "No" Vote to Come to this pilot group to date
Ratherbe there is no risk of arbitration in this instance. With that said, had this been an open contract situation where we had signed an MOA, when arbitration was a possible outcome, then yes it would be a concern.Ratherbe wrote: ↑Tue Oct 04, 2022 8:54 amYou mean like when we turned down the TA and got FOS? You never learn. Go back and check our discussions. Your predictions are wrong and your character assessments are wrong too.
You and the p4c are misleading the junior pilots and playing on their emotions.
I would say that you are right though. We clearly didn’t learn. Your point is exactly why crap like this should never make it to the membership in the first place.
It should also be sending alarm bells and shivers down our spine about entering regular negotiations with ACPA. If they they sign a crappy MOA like this when arbitration is a possible outcome, we are all royally screwed. AGAIN.
Thanks for the reminder Ratherbe
Get RID of ACPA STAT. The only thing this MOA should generate is a reminder of how great a risk ACPA is to your WAWCON.