ALPA Petition

Discuss topics relating to Air Canada.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
TeePeeCreeper
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1025
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 12:25 pm
Location: in the bush

Re: ALPA Petition

Post by TeePeeCreeper »

schnitzel2k3 wrote: Mon Mar 20, 2023 5:08 pm
Did you forget to quote me so as to hopefully not get a response?

I do not work for Westjet - nor have I ever considered working for Westjet. I am not represented by ALPA either. Their agreement (WSPG) certainly doesn't help, but you see Kaffee - they are a low cost carrier. Their service is below that of Air Canada - despite their ticket prices pretty much matching them (love the people at WS, hate the aircraft, seats and the LCC model).

So....yes this industry is heavily affected and guided by the ebb and flow of Air Canada's hiring while salaries and WAWCON are stagnant due to the absolute disservice ACPA has provided as a union representative.

This entire INDUSTRY unfortunately hinges on the decision making and growth of 1 company.

It doesn't take much pontification (how long did it take you to look up that word bud) to know how ACPA has negatively affected an entire industry with poor representation and I'm sorry to say a formerly apathetic pilot group.

It looks as though the winds of change for our industry have arrived. Hopefully run with it.

Fyi, don't hate the pilot group, I'd share a coffee and beer with y'all any day of the week. I just think the mob mentality, guided by fear from the senior flight group and capture all the flying has put you behind the 8 ball. You win, we all win. I'd love to see AC FO's make 100k plus from day 1, and Captains tickle the 300-400k club without being draft whores. I'll likely never directly benefit from that, but indirectly that gives me more negotiating capital to do my job.

You win, we all win.
Classy post and all too true.

What’s good for the goose can’t be bad for the gander…

TPC
---------- ADS -----------
 
lownslow
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1710
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 8:56 am

Re: ALPA Petition

Post by lownslow »

kiaszceski wrote: Thu Mar 16, 2023 8:50 am What change should one expect in term of career progression or lobbying if AC joins ALPA?
Would this help raising the wawcons?
I don’t have an answer to that but as near as I can tell the absolute worst case scenario is nothing changes.
---------- ADS -----------
 
bobcaygeon
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 683
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 8:03 am

Re: ALPA Petition

Post by bobcaygeon »

lownslow wrote: Tue Mar 21, 2023 12:45 am
kiaszceski wrote: Thu Mar 16, 2023 8:50 am What change should one expect in term of career progression or lobbying if AC joins ALPA?
Would this help raising the wawcons?
I don’t have an answer to that but as near as I can tell the absolute worst case scenario is nothing changes.
Are you sure about that? ALPA's mandate and structure gives the MEC a lot more power. Very few items such as MOU/LOU's etc need to be taken to the membership unlike ACPA's structure. You can reelect a different MEC but not undo the damage they've done.
The current AC pilot mess could still have happened with ALPA in power but you just wouldn't get to vote on it first. The cargo MOA wouldn't require a vote. The same old players will end up in power eventually.
PS you get to pay more for this service as well.
---------- ADS -----------
 
lownslow
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1710
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 8:56 am

Re: ALPA Petition

Post by lownslow »

bobcaygeon wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 11:40 am
lownslow wrote: Tue Mar 21, 2023 12:45 am
kiaszceski wrote: Thu Mar 16, 2023 8:50 am What change should one expect in term of career progression or lobbying if AC joins ALPA?
Would this help raising the wawcons?
I don’t have an answer to that but as near as I can tell the absolute worst case scenario is nothing changes.
Are you sure about that? ALPA's mandate and structure gives the MEC a lot more power. Very few items such as MOU/LOU's etc need to be taken to the membership unlike ACPA's structure. You can reelect a different MEC but not undo the damage they've done.
The current AC pilot mess could still have happened with ALPA in power but you just wouldn't get to vote on it first. The cargo MOA wouldn't require a vote. The same old players will end up in power eventually.
PS you get to pay more for this service as well.
Is this a problem every other airline faces regularly?
---------- ADS -----------
 
altiplano
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5382
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 2:24 pm

Re: ALPA Petition

Post by altiplano »

bobcaygeon wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 11:40 am
lownslow wrote: Tue Mar 21, 2023 12:45 am
kiaszceski wrote: Thu Mar 16, 2023 8:50 am What change should one expect in term of career progression or lobbying if AC joins ALPA?
Would this help raising the wawcons?
I don’t have an answer to that but as near as I can tell the absolute worst case scenario is nothing changes.
Are you sure about that? ALPA's mandate and structure gives the MEC a lot more power. Very few items such as MOU/LOU's etc need to be taken to the membership unlike ACPA's structure. You can reelect a different MEC but not undo the damage they've done.
The current AC pilot mess could still have happened with ALPA in power but you just wouldn't get to vote on it first. The cargo MOA wouldn't require a vote. The same old players will end up in power eventually.
PS you get to pay more for this service as well.
As is the ACPA MEC holds ALL the power. No veto. No transparency. More than half your base votes to recall you and you're still untouchable.

They control all committee appointments, keep everyone in their little towers, everything flows to the MEC.

And who does the ACPA MEC have a fiduciary duty to? Not the membership, but the ACPA organization itself and it's staff. The CEO, LRD, the comms manager.

Can't get out fast enough.
---------- ADS -----------
 
bobcaygeon
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 683
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 8:03 am

Re: ALPA Petition

Post by bobcaygeon »

lownslow wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 1:41 pm
bobcaygeon wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 11:40 am
lownslow wrote: Tue Mar 21, 2023 12:45 am
I don’t have an answer to that but as near as I can tell the absolute worst case scenario is nothing changes.
Are you sure about that? ALPA's mandate and structure gives the MEC a lot more power. Very few items such as MOU/LOU's etc need to be taken to the membership unlike ACPA's structure. You can reelect a different MEC but not undo the damage they've done.
The current AC pilot mess could still have happened with ALPA in power but you just wouldn't get to vote on it first. The cargo MOA wouldn't require a vote. The same old players will end up in power eventually.
PS you get to pay more for this service as well.
Is this a problem every other airline faces regularly?
All depends on how organized your internal leadership is. ALPA Canada/Washington can be very lazy and not helpful to the MEC/NC unless your own agenda happens to match theirs. AC will get some help to start. They've been brutal at helping with first contracts at small airlines. Unifor's FA's come more organized to the table on initial and recurrent contracts.
They may be better than ACPA but as a member it's still a small group with special interests that don't usually benefit the junior people.
---------- ADS -----------
 
elite
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2019 8:46 am

Re: ALPA Petition

Post by elite »

schnitzel2k3 wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 4:48 pm
Dash.Trash wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 4:28 pm
PostmasterGeneral wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 11:31 am

Oh boy, if you thought an innocuous statement like that was an insult, maybe you should change your username to snowflake.
You can say that again.

No the plan is not to insult people, it is to provide facts to quash rumours that individuals such as he continue to spread without any evidence to back them up. Now that the TA and summaries are out, here is a direct excerpt from the summary to hopefully kill this one dead:
The following are key facts about ALPA Merger Policy:
▪ ALPA Merger Policy does not require pilot seniority lists to be integrated by Date-of-Hire.
▪ The determination of whether a "merger" has occurred is made by ALPA's
Executive Council.
• A merger between ACPA and ALPA is not a merger between Air Canada and Jazz
or any other ALPA Canadian carrier.
• A merger between ACPA and ALPA does not trigger an integration of the seniority
lists of the pilots at Air Canada and Jazz or any other ALPA Canadian carrier.
I thought this was fairly common knowledge last year that merging was not an intention of ALPA coming on board. Sure....Jazz guys would LOVE for that to happen. Not happening. How are guys still biting their nails about this? ACPA fearmongering was strong when ALPA threw their hat on the ring.
ACPA hasn't been working well, true, however jumping into the arms of an American union is not the answer either. ALPA experiment in Canada has not been very successful. Notwithstanding Transat and its Quebec factor, WestJet and Jazz have not fared well, neither did C3. Of course, misery loves company, but hyperbole of its current proponents aside, ALPA has consistently overpromised and overcharged, and underdelivered. It has a poor track record, and it will not improve the situation for Canadian pilots to send more of their hard-earned money to Virginia! It's better to have a made in Canada solution, and who better to lead that charge than the flag carrier and then bring others onboard. No fearmongering, just facts.
---------- ADS -----------
 
ashtray
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2019 12:58 pm

Re: ALPA Petition

Post by ashtray »

elite wrote: Sat Apr 01, 2023 10:07 am
schnitzel2k3 wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 4:48 pm
Dash.Trash wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 4:28 pm

You can say that again.

No the plan is not to insult people, it is to provide facts to quash rumours that individuals such as he continue to spread without any evidence to back them up. Now that the TA and summaries are out, here is a direct excerpt from the summary to hopefully kill this one dead:

I thought this was fairly common knowledge last year that merging was not an intention of ALPA coming on board. Sure....Jazz guys would LOVE for that to happen. Not happening. How are guys still biting their nails about this? ACPA fearmongering was strong when ALPA threw their hat on the ring.
ACPA hasn't been working well, true, however jumping into the arms of an American union is not the answer either. ALPA experiment in Canada has not been very successful. Notwithstanding Transat and its Quebec factor, WestJet and Jazz have not fared well, neither did C3. Of course, misery loves company, but hyperbole of its current proponents aside, ALPA has consistently overpromised and overcharged, and underdelivered. It has a poor track record, and it will not improve the situation for Canadian pilots to send more of their hard-earned money to Virginia! It's better to have a made in Canada solution, and who better to lead that charge than the flag carrier and then bring others onboard. No fearmongering, just facts.
Agree 100 percent. Air Canada pilots lead the way, and the rest of the airlines in Canada will follow suit. If CALPA had not disintegrated would the organization today be looking to join ALPA? Doubtful.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Bede
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4433
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:52 am

Re: ALPA Petition

Post by Bede »

elite wrote: Sat Apr 01, 2023 10:07 am ACPA hasn't been working well, true, however jumping into the arms of an American union is not the answer either. ALPA experiment in Canada has not been very successful. Notwithstanding Transat and its Quebec factor, WestJet and Jazz have not fared well, neither did C3. Of course, misery loves company, but hyperbole of its current proponents aside, ALPA has consistently overpromised and overcharged, and underdelivered. It has a poor track record, and it will not improve the situation for Canadian pilots to send more of their hard-earned money to Virginia! It's better to have a made in Canada solution, and who better to lead that charge than the flag carrier and then bring others onboard. No fearmongering, just facts.
That's pure nonsense. While ACPA wages have dropped over the last 20 years, WJ's have continued to increase. For example, last contract we saw a 13.6% wage increase. I'd wager that WJ also work fewer days than their counterparts at AC. (Vacation, training inside the block, etc ).

ALPA doesn't promise anything. They tell you about the resources available and it's up to the pilot groups to use them. For example, over Covid, ALPA provided monthly economic updates to pilot groups. They timed the recovery to a month. This information allowed us to make an informed decision in rejecting another concessionary MOA. With ALPA's legal assistance, we got layoff pay in addition to our encore salaries for those who bumped down. Most of us did very well.

If all the deductions on my pay, I get the most value out of my ALPA dues.
---------- ADS -----------
 
TFTMB heavy
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 656
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 9:58 am

Re: ALPA Petition

Post by TFTMB heavy »

There is a lot of misinformation about how ALPA works and what they can do for a pilot group. Think of it as a service provider with many specialists and departments . You have to go get those services, be informed of what is available and use it. Small airlines pilot groups could not afford the legal representation, communications or economic and financial advisors that ALPA has, impossible. Some of these small airline pilot groups get a bum deal because they lack some experience and they ultimately make the final decision, not ALPA.

It's not a perfect set up but local counsels vote on contract modifications (LOA/MOA). The general rule is that if it affects pay and working conditions it goes to a membership vote.


The orange sticker and the toll free number on it is worth every penny even if you never what to have to use it. Another service available that isn't talked bout much.


Someone made a comment about Air Transat and the Quebec factor, sure helps but half the business is out of YYZ. Shut down twice during COVID, haven't seen that Quebec money yet, just some shitty loans from the feds.
---------- ADS -----------
 
RochVoisine
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2023 6:47 pm

Re: ALPA Petition

Post by RochVoisine »

elite wrote: Sat Apr 01, 2023 10:07 am
schnitzel2k3 wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 4:48 pm
Dash.Trash wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 4:28 pm

You can say that again.

No the plan is not to insult people, it is to provide facts to quash rumours that individuals such as he continue to spread without any evidence to back them up. Now that the TA and summaries are out, here is a direct excerpt from the summary to hopefully kill this one dead:

I thought this was fairly common knowledge last year that merging was not an intention of ALPA coming on board. Sure....Jazz guys would LOVE for that to happen. Not happening. How are guys still biting their nails about this? ACPA fearmongering was strong when ALPA threw their hat on the ring.
ACPA hasn't been working well, true, however jumping into the arms of an American union is not the answer either. ALPA experiment in Canada has not been very successful. Notwithstanding Transat and its Quebec factor, WestJet and Jazz have not fared well, neither did C3. Of course, misery loves company, but hyperbole of its current proponents aside, ALPA has consistently overpromised and overcharged, and underdelivered. It has a poor track record, and it will not improve the situation for Canadian pilots to send more of their hard-earned money to Virginia! It's better to have a made in Canada solution, and who better to lead that charge than the flag carrier and then bring others onboard. No fearmongering, just facts.
This sounds just great..here is a capability with the largest & most experienced pilot union in the world commanding the highest compensation on the planet and we want to come up with our own solution

Who needs a F35 when you can have a Q400 on floats
---------- ADS -----------
 
ashtray
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2019 12:58 pm

Re: ALPA Petition

Post by ashtray »

TFTMB heavy wrote: Sun Apr 02, 2023 8:27 am There is a lot of misinformation about how ALPA works and what they can do for a pilot group. Think of it as a service provider with many specialists and departments . You have to go get those services, be informed of what is available and use it. Small airlines pilot groups could not afford the legal representation, communications or economic and financial advisors that ALPA has, impossible. Some of these small airline pilot groups get a bum deal because they lack some experience and they ultimately make the final decision, not ALPA.

It's not a perfect set up but local counsels vote on contract modifications (LOA/MOA). The general rule is that if it affects pay and working conditions it goes to a membership vote.


The orange sticker and the toll free number on it is worth every penny even if you never what to have to use it. Another service available that isn't talked bout much.


Someone made a comment about Air Transat and the Quebec factor, sure helps but half the business is out of YYZ. Shut down twice during COVID, haven't seen that Quebec money yet, just some shitty loans from the feds.

Not implying anything bad about ALPA. My only point is if CALPA had not ceased to exist, I doubt any pilot group in Canada would have joined ALPA instead of CALPA. If Air Canada and WestJet pilots formed CALPA 2, smaller carriers (ULCCs) would be drawn in. The goal should be no matter what airline operates the B737 MAX8, a set hourly rate with similar working conditions exist. Let's make the airline pilot profession attractive again for young people considering it as a career option.
---------- ADS -----------
 
cdnavater
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1352
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:25 am

Re: ALPA Petition

Post by cdnavater »

ashtray wrote: Sun Apr 02, 2023 11:08 am
TFTMB heavy wrote: Sun Apr 02, 2023 8:27 am There is a lot of misinformation about how ALPA works and what they can do for a pilot group. Think of it as a service provider with many specialists and departments . You have to go get those services, be informed of what is available and use it. Small airlines pilot groups could not afford the legal representation, communications or economic and financial advisors that ALPA has, impossible. Some of these small airline pilot groups get a bum deal because they lack some experience and they ultimately make the final decision, not ALPA.

It's not a perfect set up but local counsels vote on contract modifications (LOA/MOA). The general rule is that if it affects pay and working conditions it goes to a membership vote.


The orange sticker and the toll free number on it is worth every penny even if you never what to have to use it. Another service available that isn't talked bout much.


Someone made a comment about Air Transat and the Quebec factor, sure helps but half the business is out of YYZ. Shut down twice during COVID, haven't seen that Quebec money yet, just some shitty loans from the feds.

Not implying anything bad about ALPA. My only point is if CALPA had not ceased to exist, I doubt any pilot group in Canada would have joined ALPA instead of CALPA. If Air Canada and WestJet pilots formed CALPA 2, smaller carriers (ULCCs) would be drawn in. The goal should be no matter what airline operates the B737 MAX8, a set hourly rate with similar working conditions exist. Let's make the airline pilot profession attractive again for young people considering it as a career option.
So, let me get this straight, you want all other airlines in Canada who are mostly with APLA to drop them and join a failed union from two decades ago!
Because?
---------- ADS -----------
 
TFTMB heavy
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 656
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 9:58 am

Re: ALPA Petition

Post by TFTMB heavy »

cdnavater wrote: Sun Apr 02, 2023 11:52 am
ashtray wrote: Sun Apr 02, 2023 11:08 am
TFTMB heavy wrote: Sun Apr 02, 2023 8:27 am There is a lot of misinformation about how ALPA works and what they can do for a pilot group. Think of it as a service provider with many specialists and departments . You have to go get those services, be informed of what is available and use it. Small airlines pilot groups could not afford the legal representation, communications or economic and financial advisors that ALPA has, impossible. Some of these small airline pilot groups get a bum deal because they lack some experience and they ultimately make the final decision, not ALPA.

It's not a perfect set up but local counsels vote on contract modifications (LOA/MOA). The general rule is that if it affects pay and working conditions it goes to a membership vote.


The orange sticker and the toll free number on it is worth every penny even if you never what to have to use it. Another service available that isn't talked bout much.


Someone made a comment about Air Transat and the Quebec factor, sure helps but half the business is out of YYZ. Shut down twice during COVID, haven't seen that Quebec money yet, just some shitty loans from the feds.

Not implying anything bad about ALPA. My only point is if CALPA had not ceased to exist, I doubt any pilot group in Canada would have joined ALPA instead of CALPA. If Air Canada and WestJet pilots formed CALPA 2, smaller carriers (ULCCs) would be drawn in. The goal should be no matter what airline operates the B737 MAX8, a set hourly rate with similar working conditions exist. Let's make the airline pilot profession attractive again for young people considering it as a career option.
So, let me get this straight, you want all other airlines in Canada who are mostly with APLA to drop them and join a failed union from two decades ago!
Because?
It's been talked about in the past that ALPA Canada could be a separate entity with a services agreement with ALPA international. I would not be surprised if these talks restart once the dust settles on the ACPA integration.
---------- ADS -----------
 
ashtray
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2019 12:58 pm

Re: ALPA Petition

Post by ashtray »

cdnavater wrote: Sun Apr 02, 2023 11:52 am
ashtray wrote: Sun Apr 02, 2023 11:08 am
TFTMB heavy wrote: Sun Apr 02, 2023 8:27 am There is a lot of misinformation about how ALPA works and what they can do for a pilot group. Think of it as a service provider with many specialists and departments . You have to go get those services, be informed of what is available and use it. Small airlines pilot groups could not afford the legal representation, communications or economic and financial advisors that ALPA has, impossible. Some of these small airline pilot groups get a bum deal because they lack some experience and they ultimately make the final decision, not ALPA.

It's not a perfect set up but local counsels vote on contract modifications (LOA/MOA). The general rule is that if it affects pay and working conditions it goes to a membership vote.


The orange sticker and the toll free number on it is worth every penny even if you never what to have to use it. Another service available that isn't talked bout much.


Someone made a comment about Air Transat and the Quebec factor, sure helps but half the business is out of YYZ. Shut down twice during COVID, haven't seen that Quebec money yet, just some shitty loans from the feds.

Not implying anything bad about ALPA. My only point is if CALPA had not ceased to exist, I doubt any pilot group in Canada would have joined ALPA instead of CALPA. If Air Canada and WestJet pilots formed CALPA 2, smaller carriers (ULCCs) would be drawn in. The goal should be no matter what airline operates the B737 MAX8, a set hourly rate with similar working conditions exist. Let's make the airline pilot profession attractive again for young people considering it as a career option.
So, let me get this straight, you want all other airlines in Canada who are mostly with APLA to drop them and join a failed union from two decades ago!
Because?

I, personally, don't want anything. You are implying because CALPA was a 'failed' union there is no alternative other than to join ALPA. Some smaller pilots groups joining ALPA may have made sense at the time, following the CAIL/AC merger (ACPA), and with non-unionized WestJet pilots. The landscape today is much different than it was even five years ago. The reasons leading to the 'failed' union would obviously be addressed in a new constitution, along with other terms of reference that would serve the needs of Canadian pilots today and into the future. The only point I am making is had CALPA remained the airline pilots’ union in Canada, I doubt very much the union would now be part of ALPA, or seeking to join ALPA. What other national pilot unions (e.g. BALPA) are seeking to join ALPA? I am no longer in the industry. My only involvement now is with a nephew at Jazz. Just offering my thoughts.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Bede
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4433
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:52 am

Re: ALPA Petition

Post by Bede »

TFTMB heavy wrote: Sun Apr 02, 2023 12:58 pm
It's been talked about in the past that ALPA Canada could be a separate entity with a services agreement with ALPA international. I would not be surprised if these talks restart once the dust settles on the ACPA integration.
What would be the advantages of such an arrangement?
---------- ADS -----------
 
TFTMB heavy
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 656
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 9:58 am

Re: ALPA Petition

Post by TFTMB heavy »

Bede wrote: Mon Apr 03, 2023 4:39 am
TFTMB heavy wrote: Sun Apr 02, 2023 12:58 pm
It's been talked about in the past that ALPA Canada could be a separate entity with a services agreement with ALPA international. I would not be surprised if these talks restart once the dust settles on the ACPA integration.
What would be the advantages of such an arrangement?
Dues would go to ALPA Canada instead of Washington. Right now we get some back to fund the Canada Board and MECs but most of it stays south to fund all the programs and services. We could potentially have some of our own programs and services and pay ALPA US for the rest. More staff in Canada, more Canadian expertise to serve Canadian pilots.

This is all of the top of my head from what I remember when it was b being discuss. Someone else probably has better or more up to date info.
---------- ADS -----------
 
cdnavater
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1352
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:25 am

Re: ALPA Petition

Post by cdnavater »

TFTMB heavy wrote: Mon Apr 03, 2023 6:08 am
Bede wrote: Mon Apr 03, 2023 4:39 am
TFTMB heavy wrote: Sun Apr 02, 2023 12:58 pm
It's been talked about in the past that ALPA Canada could be a separate entity with a services agreement with ALPA international. I would not be surprised if these talks restart once the dust settles on the ACPA integration.
What would be the advantages of such an arrangement?
Dues would go to ALPA Canada instead of Washington. Right now we get some back to fund the Canada Board and MECs but most of it stays south to fund all the programs and services. We could potentially have some of our own programs and services and pay ALPA US for the rest. More staff in Canada, more Canadian expertise to serve Canadian pilots.

This is all of the top of my head from what I remember when it was b being discuss. Someone else probably has better or more up to date info.
I can see some advantages to that for sure, do we have a lobby group here, they sure put a lot of pressure on the government in the US. We write letters to our MPs, never heard about us having professional lobbyists pressuring our government, not to say we don’t, just haven’t heard of any.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Bede
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4433
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:52 am

Re: ALPA Petition

Post by Bede »

TFTMB heavy wrote: Mon Apr 03, 2023 6:08 am Dues would go to ALPA Canada instead of Washington. Right now we get some back to fund the Canada Board and MECs but most of it stays south to fund all the programs and services. We could potentially have some of our own programs and services and pay ALPA US for the rest. More staff in Canada, more Canadian expertise to serve Canadian pilots.

This is all of the top of my head from what I remember when it was b being discuss. Someone else probably has better or more up to date info.
Most of the dues are used for association flight relief for your MEC/volunteers and for the resources that ALPA offers. For Canadians, most of the expensive resources are Canadian based. The lawyers/labour relations advisors are Canadians (they need to be familiar with Canadian Labour Law). The Economic and Financial Analysis people are based in the US though.
---------- ADS -----------
 
TFTMB heavy
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 656
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 9:58 am

Re: ALPA Petition

Post by TFTMB heavy »

cdnavater wrote: Mon Apr 03, 2023 7:14 am
TFTMB heavy wrote: Mon Apr 03, 2023 6:08 am
Bede wrote: Mon Apr 03, 2023 4:39 am
What would be the advantages of such an arrangement?
Dues would go to ALPA Canada instead of Washington. Right now we get some back to fund the Canada Board and MECs but most of it stays south to fund all the programs and services. We could potentially have some of our own programs and services and pay ALPA US for the rest. More staff in Canada, more Canadian expertise to serve Canadian pilots.

This is all of the top of my head from what I remember when it was b being discuss. Someone else probably has better or more up to date info.
I can see some advantages to that for sure, do we have a lobby group here, they sure put a lot of pressure on the government in the US. We write letters to our MPs, never heard about us having professional lobbyists pressuring our government, not to say we don’t, just haven’t heard of any.
I don't believe that we do.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Air Canada”