When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Discuss topics relating to Air Canada.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Fanblade
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1702
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by Fanblade »

cdnavater wrote: Fri Oct 28, 2022 5:12 am
canadian_aviator_4 wrote: Fri Oct 28, 2022 2:24 am Would it make a difference if a lot of companies voted out their current mecs for more junior ones? The majority seem too close with management and in senior positions, where they are improving their own conditions at the expense of junior members. I see this with Jazz, where a disconnect exists between senior pilots and their awareness of how dire the financial situation of many junior members.
You have no fucking clue what the @#$! you are talking about, give me some examples of how the seniors improved their conditions at the expense of the junior members.
My pension hasn’t improved since 2010, my benefits are the same and the gd pay has gone up exactly 2% per year since 2010, top captain pay at the 17 year mark has only changed by 2% per year, so where exactly has my situation improved at your fucking expense, please enlighten me!
In fact, since 2010 including the 2010 contract, the only improvements went to the junior members with exception to the concessionary contract in 2015, which again our backs were up against a wall where two other companies were undercutting our wages to our detriment.
You have the ability to improve your conditions, I hear Flair is hiring, so is Porter but I suspect in the end you’re willing to whore yourself out to get to AC and complain about about how you’ve been fucked over by senior members. That won’t change when you get to AC.
By the way, I was somewhat new during the 2010 contract, I was still an FO for the 2015 contract and not by choice, not once did I ever think I was being sold out by the senior members who made this place the top paid Regional airline in North America, back then of course, that put a target on our back.
Also, the target was placed on our backs by the AC pilots, if you want to lay some blame on your current situation, start there.
Last thing, the union you speak of, turned down the companies request to throw some money at the training department, their response was everybody gets a raise or nobody, doesn’t sound like a union looking out for themselves but you do you!
Absolutely.

Instead of fighting with each other, how about just look at the root cause of your grievances.

It was ACPA ( my Union ) amending the CPA language within our CBA. That was the catalyst that brought a gun to ALPA Jazz’s head in 2015.

We sold out Jazz’s leverage for some peanuts. In the end we hurt ourselves because it holds our bottom end wages down.

Why did we do this? ACPA believed it needed to help AC reduce costs at Jazz. The average AC pilot didn’t think this way. But ACPA leadership did.

ACPA has spent the last decade one downing themselves and everyone else. Being the only legacy this has produced a glass ceiling in Canada for everyone.

As everyone is aware we almost one downed again in the latest MOA. Sorry for that. It takes time and the battle for control of ACPA has been hostile particularly in the last year.

I’m particularly proud of the AC pilots standing up against what the outgoing MEC was trying to push through. The membership is onside for change.

Looking forward to a new approach in the new year.

This thread is titled When ALPA says “ where should we set the bar”

Up. Way up.

Let the one upping begin.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Blueontop
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 422
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2014 8:01 pm

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by Blueontop »

Loon-A-Tic wrote: Fri Oct 28, 2022 5:23 am
canadian_aviator_4 wrote: Fri Oct 28, 2022 2:24 am Would it make a difference if a lot of companies voted out their current mecs for more junior ones? The majority seem too close with management and in senior positions, where they are improving their own conditions at the expense of junior members. I see this with Jazz, where a disconnect exists between senior pilots and their awareness of how dire the financial situation of many junior members.
The issue at Jazz isn't a disconnect, is a difference generational mind set. The next generation no longer see Jazz as a career path, only a steppingstone to The Mother Ship. That generates very little incentive for the Jazz MEC to negotiate any significant gains at the expense of those who choose to stay put. The very thing the next generation convents; flow to mainline, is what has kept and will keep the entry level pay scales where they are. You can't have your cake and eat as well. Earlier generations in Canadian aviation paid their dues in the North, on a dock, slugging freight at -40c and a whole host of other "entry level" tasks. The next generation is paying their dues through flow, depressed wages and flat pay for their first few years at The Mother Ships. In one way or another we all paid or will pay somehow.

Ahhh yes, I paid my dues when I started making most likely below poverty wages after really calculating it and I must “pay them again” when I go to the countries flagship carrier or any other 705 operation…

F off,
Signed every Canadian pilot with a back bone.
---------- ADS -----------
 
canadian_aviator_4
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 444
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2022 9:32 am

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by canadian_aviator_4 »

Blueontop wrote: Fri Oct 28, 2022 10:53 am
Loon-A-Tic wrote: Fri Oct 28, 2022 5:23 am
canadian_aviator_4 wrote: Fri Oct 28, 2022 2:24 am Would it make a difference if a lot of companies voted out their current mecs for more junior ones? The majority seem too close with management and in senior positions, where they are improving their own conditions at the expense of junior members. I see this with Jazz, where a disconnect exists between senior pilots and their awareness of how dire the financial situation of many junior members.
The issue at Jazz isn't a disconnect, is a difference generational mind set. The next generation no longer see Jazz as a career path, only a steppingstone to The Mother Ship. That generates very little incentive for the Jazz MEC to negotiate any significant gains at the expense of those who choose to stay put. The very thing the next generation convents; flow to mainline, is what has kept and will keep the entry level pay scales where they are. You can't have your cake and eat as well. Earlier generations in Canadian aviation paid their dues in the North, on a dock, slugging freight at -40c and a whole host of other "entry level" tasks. The next generation is paying their dues through flow, depressed wages and flat pay for their first few years at The Mother Ships. In one way or another we all paid or will pay somehow.

Ahhh yes, I paid my dues when I started making most likely below poverty wages after really calculating it and I must “pay them again” when I go to the countries flagship carrier or any other 705 operation…

F off,
Signed every Canadian pilot with a back bone.
Love it and couldn’t agree more!
---------- ADS -----------
 
cdnavater
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1357
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:25 am

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by cdnavater »

canadian_aviator_4 wrote: Fri Oct 28, 2022 8:42 am
cdnavater wrote: Fri Oct 28, 2022 5:12 am
canadian_aviator_4 wrote: Fri Oct 28, 2022 2:24 am Would it make a difference if a lot of companies voted out their current mecs for more junior ones? The majority seem too close with management and in senior positions, where they are improving their own conditions at the expense of junior members. I see this with Jazz, where a disconnect exists between senior pilots and their awareness of how dire the financial situation of many junior members.
You have no fucking clue what the @#$! you are talking about, give me some examples of how the seniors improved their conditions at the expense of the junior members.
My pension hasn’t improved since 2010, my benefits are the same and the gd pay has gone up exactly 2% per year since 2010, top captain pay at the 17 year mark has only changed by 2% per year, so where exactly has my situation improved at your fucking expense, please enlighten me!
In fact, since 2010 including the 2010 contract, the only improvements went to the junior members with exception to the concessionary contract in 2015, which again our backs were up against a wall where two other companies were undercutting our wages to our detriment.
You have the ability to improve your conditions, I hear Flair is hiring, so is Porter but I suspect in the end you’re willing to whore yourself out to get to AC and complain about about how you’ve been fucked over by senior members. That won’t change when you get to AC.
By the way, I was somewhat new during the 2010 contract, I was still an FO for the 2015 contract and not by choice, not once did I ever think I was being sold out by the senior members who made this place the top paid Regional airline in North America, back then of course, that put a target on our back.
Also, the target was placed on our backs by the AC pilots, if you want to lay some blame on your current situation, start there.
Last thing, the union you speak of, turned down the companies request to throw some money at the training department, their response was everybody gets a raise or nobody, doesn’t sound like a union looking out for themselves but you do you!
You have been at Jazz for 12 years, so I imagine you have a lot of experience. So why do you stay if your pay is so low? I imagine with your experience you could go to Flair or Porter and make much more money.
Sorry, I meant to write I was somewhat junior for the 2010 contract, I was a yes for the strike and was ready to sacrifice a paycheque to improve things, we know how that history shaped our future but suffice to say, I never said my pay was low, I said it’s only gone up by 2% per year since before that.
After 10 years in the right seat before I could get the left seat, I never complained or blamed anyone for my choices, I turned down the AC interview in 2009 to stay and never looked back.
I love working for Jazz and even if it wasn’t for my pension, I’m too old to start over and be junior anywhere.
I can’t even imagine what you would be saying if god forbid with your 4000 hours you had t sit in the right seat, I mean 4000 hours, that entitles you to an 87 left seat.
When I started flying, 4000 hours might have got you a Navajo job, sometimes in the right seat, thank god you weren’t around for that
---------- ADS -----------
 
unionism101
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2021 11:25 am

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by unionism101 »

We need to STOP paying our dues and START getting paid as professionals throughout all of our career
---------- ADS -----------
 
DanWEC
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2323
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 1:05 pm
Location: 404

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by DanWEC »

How do you leverage or bargain for anything here when you hold no cards as the labour group? When your ability to strike has been stripped by your own government?
---------- ADS -----------
 
FelixGustof
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2022 5:42 pm

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by FelixGustof »

DanWEC wrote: Fri Oct 28, 2022 6:07 pm How do you leverage or bargain for anything here when you hold no cards as the labour group? When your ability to strike has been stripped by your own government?
Lol...

Even my 18 yrs old ass knows that

You have a CONSTITUTIONAL right to strike

https://ehlaw.ca/supreme-court-constitu ... to-strike/

Gezus AC pilots are really a beaten down lot!
---------- ADS -----------
 
cdnavater
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1357
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:25 am

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by cdnavater »

FelixGustof wrote: Fri Oct 28, 2022 6:26 pm
DanWEC wrote: Fri Oct 28, 2022 6:07 pm How do you leverage or bargain for anything here when you hold no cards as the labour group? When your ability to strike has been stripped by your own government?
Lol...

Even my 18 yrs old ass knows that

You have a CONSTITUTIONAL right to strike

https://ehlaw.ca/supreme-court-constitu ... to-strike/

Gezus AC pilots are really a beaten down lot!
You were 7 or 8 so I’ll forgive your ignorance,

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/air-ca ... -1.1268054

“The back-to-work bill to send a pair of Air Canada labour disputes to binding arbitration passed the Senate on Thursday and was quickly given royal assent.

The legislation covers about 8,600 mechanics, baggage handlers and other ground crew at Air Canada and about 3,000 pilots.

Labour Minister Lisa Raitt had proposed the back-to-work legislation on Monday, saying a work stoppage at the airline would hurt the economy.”
---------- ADS -----------
 
FelixGustof
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2022 5:42 pm

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by FelixGustof »

cdnavater wrote: Fri Oct 28, 2022 7:04 pm
FelixGustof wrote: Fri Oct 28, 2022 6:26 pm
DanWEC wrote: Fri Oct 28, 2022 6:07 pm How do you leverage or bargain for anything here when you hold no cards as the labour group? When your ability to strike has been stripped by your own government?
Lol...

Even my 18 yrs old ass knows that

You have a CONSTITUTIONAL right to strike

https://ehlaw.ca/supreme-court-constitu ... to-strike/

Gezus AC pilots are really a beaten down lot!
You were 7 or 8 so I’ll forgive your ignorance,

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/air-ca ... -1.1268054

“The back-to-work bill to send a pair of Air Canada labour disputes to binding arbitration passed the Senate on Thursday and was quickly given royal assent.

The legislation covers about 8,600 mechanics, baggage handlers and other ground crew at Air Canada and about 3,000 pilots.

Labour Minister Lisa Raitt had proposed the back-to-work legislation on Monday, saying a work stoppage at the airline would hurt the economy.”
Good thing is that in school these days they teach you about the importance of "dates"

Quoting crap from 2012 gets trumped by stuff written after and offers a new precedent moving forward

The Supreme Court ruled in 2015 that it is our CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT

Stay in school kids!

https://ropergreyell.com/resource/const ... ht-strike/

For years, governments have struggled to allow the voluntary resolution of collective bargaining disputes while at the same time protecting the public interest.

That challenge has become more complex now that the Supreme Court of Canada reversed a decades old precedent and concluded that the right to strike is protected as part of the fundamental freedom of association under section 2(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This is one of the latest developments in the Court’s application of section 2(d) to the right to participate in a process of meaningful collective bargaining.
---------- ADS -----------
 
fish4life
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2413
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 6:32 am

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by fish4life »

DanWEC wrote: Fri Oct 28, 2022 6:07 pm How do you leverage or bargain for anything here when you hold no cards as the labour group? When your ability to strike has been stripped by your own government?
On top of the Supreme Court overturning that in Canada in the States they actually can’t strike since they are subject to the railway labour act.

Simply put the 1500 hour rule + needing 1000 hours of what our 705 is to be a cpt is what’s doing it
---------- ADS -----------
 
Fanblade
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1702
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by Fanblade »

DanWEC and cdnaviater,

As was pointed out by others our fundamental right to strike was upheld at the SC. Yes we need to keep in mind that there are limits before government will start to intervene. But it needs to be after the fact. Not before the fact. It can’t be with our rights completely stripped going into a final offer scenario. You appear to fear a one off in our history as if it were permanent.

But that isn’t why I responded to your posts.
DanWEC wrote: Fri Oct 28, 2022 6:07 pm How do you leverage or bargain for anything here when you hold no cards as the labour group? When your ability to strike has been stripped by your own government?

Airlines like UAL, Delta and American don’t have a pilot shortage. They have plenty of applicants. It’s the second tier airlines that have a shortage and a turnstile of people moving through.

Pilots at AMR, UAL, DAL also haven’t had to resort to strike or arbitration to get the raises they have achieved.

So no pilot shortage. No striking.

How did they manage to get their pay increases?

There is a lesson to be learned here.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by Fanblade on Sat Oct 29, 2022 9:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
DanWEC
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2323
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 1:05 pm
Location: 404

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by DanWEC »

fish4life wrote: Fri Oct 28, 2022 9:12 pm
DanWEC wrote: Fri Oct 28, 2022 6:07 pm How do you leverage or bargain for anything here when you hold no cards as the labour group? When your ability to strike has been stripped by your own government?
On top of the Supreme Court overturning that in Canada in the States they actually can’t strike since they are subject to the railway labour act.

Simply put the 1500 hour rule + needing 1000 hours of what our 705 is to be a cpt is what’s doing it
Overturned? I haven't heard anything about that. What are you referring to? I do believe we might end up with bottom limit here, we're gonna need one soon the way things are going with hiring right now, but unfortunately, it'll likely happen through the same tragic channels that caused it in the US. I'm getting genuinely concerned right now as the bar is dropping considerably with hiring everywhere post restart, you can see and hear the human risk factors out there right now. Not their fault, it's just their experience level and it's a large cohort across the board right now. Almost a perfect storm scenario for a systemic incident increase.

And to that other poster who sounds like the kind of guy people move seats because of, you're talking about overturning recently enforced provincial policies, you're totally off the mark.

The Protecting Air Service Act is a Federal statute, currently in force.
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/ann ... lText.html

This kind of legislation would have to be challenged under a charter application before its repealed. It's not a very popular topic for anyone to take on, but I hope it does. However, it ONLY names Air Canada as the essential service....
---------- ADS -----------
 
DanWEC
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2323
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 1:05 pm
Location: 404

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by DanWEC »

Fanblade wrote: Sat Oct 29, 2022 9:23 am DanWEC and cdnaviater,

As was pointed out by others our fundamental right to strike was upheld at the SC. Yes we need to keep in mind that there are limits before government will start to intervene. But it needs to be after the fact. Not before the fact. It can’t be with our rights completely stripped going into a final offer scenario. You appear to fear a one off in our history as if it were permanent.

But that isn’t why I responded to your posts.
DanWEC wrote: Fri Oct 28, 2022 6:07 pm How do you leverage or bargain for anything here when you hold no cards as the labour group? When your ability to strike has been stripped by your own government?

Airlines like UAL, Delta and American don’t have a pilot shortage. They have plenty of applicants. It’s the second tier airlines that have a shortage and a turnstile of people moving through.

Pilots at AMR, UAL, DAL also haven’t had to resort to strike or arbitration to get the raises they have achieved.

So no pilot shortage. No striking.

How did they manage to get their pay increases?

There is a lesson to be learned here.
I 100% agree that problem lies in our representation. But the act still in place leaves a logistical hurdle. Maybe they've been gun shy, but that's probably giving them too much credit.

The Gov't did repeal the act that allowed it to unilaterally assign essential services about 5 years ago that was a win, but the act that was forged out of it remains. It would be great to see a challenge, mostly since it singles out AC!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Fanblade
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1702
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by Fanblade »

DanWEC wrote: Sat Oct 29, 2022 9:30 am
fish4life wrote: Fri Oct 28, 2022 9:12 pm
DanWEC wrote: Fri Oct 28, 2022 6:07 pm How do you leverage or bargain for anything here when you hold no cards as the labour group? When your ability to strike has been stripped by your own government?
On top of the Supreme Court overturning that in Canada in the States they actually can’t strike since they are subject to the railway labour act.

Simply put the 1500 hour rule + needing 1000 hours of what our 705 is to be a cpt is what’s doing it
Overturned? I haven't heard anything about that. What are you referring to? I do believe we might end up with bottom limit here, we're gonna need one soon the way things are going with hiring right now, but unfortunately, it'll likely happen through the same tragic channels that caused it in the US. I'm getting genuinely concerned right now as the bar is dropping considerably with hiring everywhere post restart, you can see and hear the human risk factors out there right now. Not their fault, it's just their experience level and it's a large cohort across the board right now. Almost a perfect storm scenario for a systemic incident increase.

And to that other poster who sounds like the kind of guy people move seats because of, you're talking about overturning recently enforced provincial policies, you're totally off the mark.

The Protecting Air Service Act is a Federal statute, currently in force.
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/ann ... lText.html

This kind of legislation would have to be challenged under a charter application before its repealed. It's not a very popular topic for anyone to take on, but I hope it does. However, it ONLY names Air Canada as the essential service....
DanWEC,

The SC ruling trumps anything from a lower court. Federal, Provincial. It doesn’t matter.

If you recall the Harper Government used similar legislation on the rail industry. We weren’t the only ones targeted with legislation. The postal workers got hit at one point as well. I don’t remember the name of the other legislation but it was all directed specifically at a group just like the protecting air services act was directed at us. But since the SC ruling, the government has reverted to days of old. Intervening post strike if at all. The last Rail strike was 2 weeks before “the parties” agreed to arbitration.

But none of that was my point.

The US carriers have been getting themselves into a legal strike position and then instead of striking have worked to rule. It’s slow. But it has been effective.

Alaska Airlines cancels dozens of flights as pilots picket. Notice most of the airline is running while a small fraction of flights get canceled and pilots picket.

https://www.opb.org/article/2022/04/01/ ... ts-picket/

AMR.

https://wgntv.com/news/chicago-news/ame ... e-balance/

The disclaimer at the end.

“American’s pilots participate in informational picketing periodically, which isn’t out of the ordinary and will not have an impact on our operation. We remain committed to reaching an agreement with the APA that will benefit our pilots and our operation. Last month, we passed an updated, enhanced comprehensive proposal to the APA that would ensure our pilots are paid well and competitively and that they see significant improvements to benefits and quality of life provisions.”

Delta.

https://mynorthwest.com/3615317/seeking ... l-weekend/

Delta pilots have been on the picket line several times this year. Staffing shortages have put pressure on pilots and other airline employees and Laura Woods, a first officer with Delta and an ALPA spokesperson

United

https://www.chicagobusiness.com/airline ... r-airports

Frustrated by delays, shortages and inflation, they're pushing for new contracts.

Hawaiian
---------- ADS -----------
 
Attachments
40DBE27D-B0A7-4EC0-87ED-9C05AFB5FEE1.png
40DBE27D-B0A7-4EC0-87ED-9C05AFB5FEE1.png (78.79 KiB) Viewed 1040 times
Last edited by Fanblade on Sat Oct 29, 2022 10:27 am, edited 4 times in total.
JHR
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 367
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2021 11:21 am

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by JHR »

Here comes the "we can't work to rule...if we don't do overtime our kids will starve" argument. So short sighted 🙄
---------- ADS -----------
 
DanWEC
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2323
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 1:05 pm
Location: 404

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by DanWEC »

Fanblade wrote: Sat Oct 29, 2022 9:38 am [
DanWEC,

The SC ruling trumps anything from a lower court. Federal, Provincial. It doesn’t matter.

If you recall the Harper Government used similar legislation on the rail industry. We weren’t the only ones targeted with legislation. The postal workers got hit at one point as well. I don’t remember the name of the other legislation but it was all directed specifically at a group just like the protecting air services act was directed at us. But since the SC ruling, the government has reverted to days of old. Intervening post strike if at all. The last Rail strike was 2 weeks before “the parties” agreed to arbitration.

But none of that was my point.

The US carriers have been getting themselves into a legal strike position and then instead of striking have worked to rule. It’s slow. But it has been effective.

Alaska Airlines cancels dozens of flights as pilots picket. Notice most of the airline is running while a small fraction of flights get canceled and pilots picket.

https://www.opb.org/article/2022/04/01/ ... ts-picket/

AMR.

https://wgntv.com/news/chicago-news/ame ... e-balance/

The disclaimer at the end.

“American’s pilots participate in informational picketing periodically, which isn’t out of the ordinary and will not have an impact on our operation. We remain committed to reaching an agreement with the APA that will benefit our pilots and our operation. Last month, we passed an updated, enhanced comprehensive proposal to the APA that would ensure our pilots are paid well and competitively and that they see significant improvements to benefits and quality of life provisions.”
Work to rule could be entirely effective. The amount of OT and GDO callouts is probably 10% of the schedule. The challenge is for everyone to get on board when faced with turning down the money. But really, they did it down South, why can't we? One reason is likely they didn't need the extra to pay the mortgage, but regardless, unified action HAS to happen.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by DanWEC on Sat Oct 29, 2022 10:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
rudder
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3858
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 12:10 pm

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by rudder »

The key here is to make sure that you are not playing checkers while everybody else is playing chess. Do not get outmaneuvered. Do not be out-resourced. Do not become responsive rather than offensive. Be better prepared, better organized, smarter, and as much as possible - in control.

The AC pilots are in the first quarter of the game. Be patient. Focus on the desired result.

Having 80% support is a good start. Aim for 99.9%.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Fanblade
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1702
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by Fanblade »

rudder wrote: Sat Oct 29, 2022 10:25 am The key here is to make sure that you are not playing checkers while everybody else is playing chess. Do not get outmaneuvered. Do not be out-resourced. Do not become responsive rather than offensive. Be better prepared, better organized, smarter, and as much as possible - in control.

The AC pilots are in the first quarter of the game. Be patient. Focus on the desired result.

Having 80% support is a good start. Aim for 99.9%.
---------- ADS -----------
 
hithere
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 521
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 8:05 am

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by hithere »

Just so I have this straight: the current ACPA contract is in force until the end of 2024? With a limited opener in 2023? So earliest that ACPA could be in strike position is late 2024?
---------- ADS -----------
 
negroni
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 83
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2022 12:16 pm

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by negroni »

hithere wrote: Sat Oct 29, 2022 10:34 am Just so I have this straight: the current ACPA contract is in force until the end of 2024? With a limited opener in 2023? So earliest that ACPA could be in strike position is late 2024?
theoretically end of 2023. if ACPA states the WB benchmarks haven't been met (they haven't). up to the union if they want to just say it's met and take some time to actually prepare for negotiations or call them not met and we enter full bargaining in fall 2023. based on the recent purge of the MEC, I'd personally say it's probably smart to wait until 2024. wait until we have a strong MEC, wait until the ALPA question has been asked and answered (whichever way it may go) and wait and build a strong negotiating committee and do a shit ton of prep.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Air Canada”