Tower audio from Jan. 30 CIRVIS report... Your thoughts? What was it?

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
daniel.o
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2021 1:14 pm
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Tower audio from Jan. 30 CIRVIS report... Your thoughts? What was it?

Post by daniel.o »

Here's tower audio of a Jan. 30, 2023 CIRVIS report from Yellowknife... https://youtu.be/Q6JgyhoCyi8


Any thoughts on what the crew saw? Some kind of rocket? Lasers? Something else?

Relevant CADORS reports are:
2023C0560: https://tinyurl.com/3vjtkhy9
A Canadian North Aerospatiale/Aeritalia ATR 42-500 (AKT5071) from Fort McMurray, AB (CYMM) to Yellowknife, NT (CYZF) reported 2 lights 10NM Northwest (NW) of the field. The Edmonton (EG) controller (CTR) and the shift manager (SM) were advised and a Communication Instructions for Reporting Vital Intelligence Sightings (CIRVIS) report was filed.
2023C0492: https://tinyurl.com/yc7upe58
A Canadian North Aerospatiale ATR 42-500 (AKT5071) from Fort McMurray, AB (CYMM) to Yellowknife, NT (CYZF) on approach for Runway 34 at F240 reported 2 white lights approximately at 3000ft above them and 10NM northwest (NW) of the airport, moving in a circular pattern. The pilots advised that the lights were still visible as they continued their approach all the way to the ground. There was no known traffic in the area.
Curious to hear what the AVCanada community thinks!

And here's a transcript....
Canadian North flight: Tower, it's Arctic 5071.
Air traffic control (ATC): Arctic 5071, Yellowknife radio. Good evening.
Flight: Good evening. Just wondering, do you got two planes that are just to the east of your field doing circuits or manoeuvres?
ATC: Negative, I have no reported traffic in the area. Do you have a visual on something?
Flight: Yeah, we're looking at two lights dancing around here, to the east of your field. They're above us, about, I don't know what. We're not seeing them on TCAS. But we can see the lights moving around.
ATC: I don't have anything on the radar either. Let me talk to center.
* * *
ATC: Arctic 5071, Yellowknife radio.
Flight: [Inaudible] go ahead.
ATC: Hey, center doesn’t have anything about any movement in the area, so I'm really wondering what you're seeing there.
Flight: Yeah, so are we.
ATC: Have you said they're over your position?
Flight: Oh, they're above us. We're in a [inaudible] 12,000 feet. We're [inaudible] 30 miles back from your field over the lake. And, yeah. We're seeing them just to the east of the city, [inaudible] by maybe 20, 30 miles. But they're well above us. We saw them when we were going through 20,000 feet, they looked somewhat parallel for altitude.
ATC: All right, I'm trying to look. I don't see them from the ground here. Well, I'll keep an eye out. I'll talk with center again.
Flight: Yeah, no worries [inaudible]. They're not a risk to us, we just [inaudible] just to know what it was, if you guys had a ping on the radar.
ATC: No, we got nothing. That's quite strange. Do you guys want an [inaudible] advisory?
Flight: Yeah, sure. Might as well. We're [inaudible] visual [inaudible] runway 34, direct [inaudible] at this time.
ATC: Rodger, runway 34. Wind, 290 at nine altimeter 3022. Hey this is Victor report five miles final. And let me know if there's any movement with those planes, or if they get closer or anything. I'll try to figure what's going on.
Flight: Yeah, so far they're just lights that come in and out, but there's two of them that are moving around in a circular pattern.
* * *
Flight: [Inaudible] Arctic 5071 is on a 10-mile final runway 34. We still have that traffic in sight. It's looking about 10 nautical miles directly northwest of the fields. Maybe about flight level 270 or so.
ATC: So, you're saying they're about 10 nautical miles northeast or northwest?
ATC: Northwest of the field. Yeah, 10, 20 miles-ish.
Flight: Well, I'll let you [inaudible]. We'll talk on the ground.
ATC: Sounds good. Arctic 5071.
* * *
Flight: [Inaudible] Arctic 5071 is taxiing alpha bravo to first air.
ATC: Arctic 5071, roger, [inaudible] and I have a few questions for you when you have time.
Flight: Yeah, go ahead. We actually just had visual of it while we went down 34 here.
ATC: Roger, so you reported two lights, two lights in circular patter 10 nautical miles northwest of the field. I think we first spoke around 0615 Zulu. And what flight level were you saying?
Flight: We were at 240, and it was above us. So, we're guessing about 270?
ATC: Have you said that you just you saw you had a visual on them still while landing?
Flight: Yup, we had a visual as we were, we went down 34.
ATC: Okay, so I just reported it to center. They will look into it. I'll file a CIRVIS report – this is when we have some sightings that we cannot explain. But I don't know if you guys have something you can do the same on your side, but we'll, for sure we'll look into it.
Flight: All right, thanks, yeah. If you keep your eyes peeled out there to the northwest you might be able to.
ATC: Yeah, I'm trying to look but I don't see the light. Can you see? Can you still see them from the ground? Let me know when you're in the right direction.
* * *
ATC: Traffic Yellowknife radio, do you have a visual on anything on the right at the northwest of you?
Flight: Traffic [inaudible] no, I don't see anything here.
Flight: It just disappeared.
ATC: Roger, okay. Well keep an eye out and if there's anything new just give us a call, or catch me on the radio. I'll be here for the whole night.
Flight: Okay, sounds good. Thanks. We’re headed home for the night, but if we see it again here in the next few minutes we'll let you know.
ATC: Roger, thanks a lot and have a good one.
* * *
ATC: 7844 [inaudible] Edmonton centre, good evening [inaudible] identified.
* * *
ATC: Arctic 5071, Yellowknife [inaudible]. Are you still there?
Flight: [Inaudible] Arctic 5071.
ATC: Do you know what colour were the lights?
Flight: [Inaudible] white.
ATC: Roger, thanks.
Flight: We're not crazy.
ATC: No, we believe you.
Flight: Yeah, it's kind of hit and miss coming out of that northwest, off of kind of runway 16. And it kind of comes and goes. So, it looks like it's kind of circling, and then it kind of disappears again.
ATC: We're trying to look at this. Thanks a lot, guys. Have a good one.
Flight: Thank you for everything.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
oldncold
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1064
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 11:17 am
Location: south of 78N latitude , north of 30'latitude

Re: Tower audio from Jan. 30 CIRVIS report... Your thoughts? What was it?

Post by oldncold »

Military for sure either Canadian or Usa they have the ability to jam civil atc radar . Or after towers atc call to center told to repor back tnothing . Likely they were usa f35 or f22s as part of norad op re recent ballon intrusions into north american airspace.

Common for corp pilots in usa close to their moa areas show up on tcas n adsb then vanish only to show up manevouring in a manner that no commercial aircraft would in the flight levels
---------- ADS -----------
 
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: Tower audio from Jan. 30 CIRVIS report... Your thoughts? What was it?

Post by photofly »

oldncold wrote: Thu Feb 16, 2023 9:32 pm Military for sure either Canadian or Usa they have the ability to jam civil atc radar . Or after towers atc call to center told to repor back tnothing . Likely they were usa f35 or f22s as part of norad op re recent ballon intrusions into north american airspace.

Common for corp pilots in usa close to their moa areas show up on tcas n adsb then vanish only to show up manevouring in a manner that no commercial aircraft would in the flight levels
Why bother to hide from radar and then light yourself up for everyone miles around to see?
---------- ADS -----------
 
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
Eric Janson
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1365
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 10:44 am

Re: Tower audio from Jan. 30 CIRVIS report... Your thoughts? What was it?

Post by Eric Janson »

Sounds like a possible satellite flare.

https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/649 ... est-2.html

Post #26 links to some videos and there's even a map that shows the locations of the satellites confirming that's what was spotted.

Post #97 gives details about this specific case - please pass on to to the crew involved if they haven't already seen it.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Always fly a stable approach - it's the only stability you'll find in this business
BigQ
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 312
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 3:41 pm
Location: YUL-ish

Re: Tower audio from Jan. 30 CIRVIS report... Your thoughts? What was it?

Post by BigQ »

satellite flares are linear and don't "dance around"
---------- ADS -----------
 
Eric Janson
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1365
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 10:44 am

Re: Tower audio from Jan. 30 CIRVIS report... Your thoughts? What was it?

Post by Eric Janson »

BigQ wrote: Sun Feb 19, 2023 10:15 am satellite flares are linear and don't "dance around"
Read the linked the PPRuNe post - this is explained. Everything reported fits with a Starlink Flare
---------- ADS -----------
 
Always fly a stable approach - it's the only stability you'll find in this business
daniel.o
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2021 1:14 pm
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Re: Tower audio from Jan. 30 CIRVIS report... Your thoughts? What was it?

Post by daniel.o »

I really appreciate everyone's analysis!

Interestingly a very similar CADORS report was published last night:
CADORS 2023Q0623... https://tinyurl.com/28sr9yuw
Feb 12 @ 0800z
Several aircraft reported seeing two or three very strange lights in the sky, high above the flight paths. Lights visible for about 30 minutes; they were moving in a rapid and irregular way at an altitude described as being between 50,000 and 60,000 ft. The aircraft were: a CargoLux Italia Boeing 747-800 (LXVCG/ICV93PK) from Chicago/O’Hare, IL (KORD) to Luxembourg, Luxembourg (ELLX); an Air France Airbus 330-200 (OOSEA/AFR6737) from Chicago/O’Hare, IL (KORD) to Paris/Charles-de-Gaulle, France (LFPG); and an Atlas Air Inc. Boeing 747-400 (N415MC/GTI8237) from Chicago/O’Hare, IL (KORD) to Frankfurt, Germany (EDDF).
I found ATC audio from the CargoLux Italia flight... https://youtu.be/yuwQMa0xL28

Think they were all seeing the same thing?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by daniel.o on Fri Feb 24, 2023 12:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
goldeneagle
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1294
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 3:28 pm

Re: Tower audio from Jan. 30 CIRVIS report... Your thoughts? What was it?

Post by goldeneagle »

I watched a very interesting documentary about a year ago, it was about the development of various projects at the skunkworks. In an interview, Kelly Johnston said that during initial flight testing of the A-12 (which became the SR-71) there were reports of UFO flying over California, then all the hype started around Roswell. He hinted, but did not state outright, there was some 'feeding of the trolls' to help keep the black project secret and help the conspiracy types focus on New Mexico rather than the Groom Lake test site.

Me thinks it's just another program testing an as yet unknown new aircraft, likely a high altitude drone of some type. At various points in the test program, fly a long distance from the test area, slow the aircraft down, turn the lights on, listen on center frequencies till there are enough conversations to get the conspiracy folks all in a tither about alien UFO type things, then turn the lights off and back to business.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Eric Janson
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1365
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 10:44 am

Re: Tower audio from Jan. 30 CIRVIS report... Your thoughts? What was it?

Post by Eric Janson »

daniel.o wrote: Wed Feb 22, 2023 3:12 pm I really appreciate everyone's analysis!

Interestingly a very similar CADORS report was published last night:
CADORS 2023Q0623... https://tinyurl.com/28sr9yuw
Feb 12 @ 0800z
Several aircraft reported seeing two or three very strange lights in the sky, high above the flight paths. Lights visible for about 30 minutes; they were moving in a rapid and irregular way at an altitude described as being between 50,000 and 60,000 ft. The aircraft were: a CargoLux Italia Boeing 747-800 (LXVCG/ICV93PK) from Chicago/O’Hare, IL (KORD) to Luxembourg, Luxembourg (ELLX); an Air France Airbus 330-200 (OOSEA/AFR6737) from Chicago/O’Hare, IL (KORD) to Paris/Charles-de-Gaulle, France (LFPG); and an Atlas Air Inc. Boeing 747-400 (N415MC/GTI8237) from Chicago/O’Hare, IL (KORD) to Frankfurt, Germany (EDDF).
I found ATC audio from the CargoLux Italia flight... https://youtu.be/yuwQMa0xL28

Think they were all seeing the same thing?
A quick search shows multiple Starlink satellites visible at this time - Starlink flare(s) would account for what was reported.

I think a lot of people are not aware just how many Starlink Satellites are up there.

- Currently 3580 Starlink Satellites in Low Earth Orbit.
- Planned to increase to nearly 12000.
- Possible extension to 42000

Expect to see more of these reports.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Always fly a stable approach - it's the only stability you'll find in this business
daniel.o
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2021 1:14 pm
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Re: Tower audio from Jan. 30 CIRVIS report... Your thoughts? What was it?

Post by daniel.o »

If so, the folks at Starlink really ought to start communicating with Nav Canada, Transport Canada, FAA, etc.
So many aviators are reporting lights like these and they deserve answers.
---------- ADS -----------
 
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: Tower audio from Jan. 30 CIRVIS report... Your thoughts? What was it?

Post by photofly »

daniel.o wrote: Mon Feb 27, 2023 10:20 am If so, the folks at Starlink really ought to start communicating with Nav Canada, Transport Canada, FAA, etc.
So many aviators are reporting lights like these and they deserve answers.
What would that communication look like?

The satellites are cruising at an altitude of 1,806,000 feet, on well defined and predictable orbits, announced and agreed years in advance with the ITU, which is the appropriate international body. It's not controlled airspace up there, and they're not a hazard to aviation. Why should anyone care what some aviators think they see?

To be honest, I think the airlines should be writing to everyone on the ground about the non-existence of chemtrails, every single time they have a flight in the stratosphere. The worried public public deserves that reassurance.

Fun facts: there are at present about 3600 Starlink satellites in orbit at the moment, with a future extension up to 42,000. By comparison, there are probably about 8,000 airliners in the air at the moment. Fascinating to think that Starlink satellites alone may come to outnumber airplanes by 5 to 1. And that's not counting any other organizations (Amazon) or countries launching their own satellite internet constellations (China, anyone?). Since Canada occupies 2% of the Earth's surface, roughly 72 Starlink satellites are over Canada at any given moment.
---------- ADS -----------
 
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
goldeneagle
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1294
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 3:28 pm

Re: Tower audio from Jan. 30 CIRVIS report... Your thoughts? What was it?

Post by goldeneagle »

daniel.o wrote: Mon Feb 27, 2023 10:20 am If so, the folks at Starlink really ought to start communicating with Nav Canada, Transport Canada, FAA, etc.
So many aviators are reporting lights like these and they deserve answers.
anybody can see where they are, in real time.

https://www.heavens-above.com/StarLink. ... ng=-111.49

There ya go. push the play button, it'll show you the orbits for a day.
---------- ADS -----------
 
goldeneagle
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1294
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 3:28 pm

Re: Tower audio from Jan. 30 CIRVIS report... Your thoughts? What was it?

Post by goldeneagle »

photofly wrote: Mon Feb 27, 2023 11:10 am Since Canada occupies 2% of the Earth's surface, roughly 72 Starlink satellites are over Canada at any given moment.
That would be the case if they were all in a polar orbit, but, since much of Canada is north of the majority of the constellation, it wont be quite that many. At present there is only a small handful that go north of 53N, so there aren't that many over Canada. But that's changing, a bunch of the launches these days are to flesh out the shell that will be in polar orbits for global coverage. They are using some cute tricks of orbital mechanics to conserve fuel while moving those sats into various inclinations, so some of them take 8 or 10 months after launch to reach the final destination orbit, and do so without burning up precious maneuvering mass.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”