182 crash at Langley

Topics related to accidents, incidents & over due aircraft should be placed in this forum.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore

Post Reply
User avatar
PilotDAR
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4113
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 6:46 pm
Location: Near CNJ4 Orillia, Ontario

182 crash at Langley

Post by PilotDAR »

CBC reports a crash at Langley:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british- ... -1.6830201

I was in there a couple of weeks ago in the Beaver, thinking about the roads close under three of the four approaches. I hope the injured recover okay...
---------- ADS -----------
 
boeingboy
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1644
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 2:57 pm
Location: West coast

Re: 182 crash at Langley

Post by boeingboy »

I was there - saw the fire start. He had a fairly new engine in it. His hanger neighbors said he was constantly messing with it. The water cooler conjecture is he lost the engine on short final and in the process of trying to make the runway he clipped the truck - went through the airport fence and ended up against the berm at the end of 25. His wife seems ok and he was burnt. We don't know how bad yet but he was flown to VGH. He probably got burnt crawling over to the right side door to get out.
---------- ADS -----------
 
RVgrin
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 184
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 4:12 am

Re: 182 crash at Langley

Post by RVgrin »

Thanks for the info. Hoping for a speedy recovery for all involved.

Do you mean the beginning of 25 (end of 07)?
---------- ADS -----------
 
boeingboy
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1644
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 2:57 pm
Location: West coast

Re: 182 crash at Langley

Post by boeingboy »

Yes. They hit just short of the threshold of 25.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Attachments
crash5.jpg
crash5.jpg (227.46 KiB) Viewed 3019 times
crash2.png
crash2.png (500.88 KiB) Viewed 3019 times
crash1.jpg
crash1.jpg (86.45 KiB) Viewed 3019 times
boeingboy
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1644
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 2:57 pm
Location: West coast

Re: 182 crash at Langley

Post by boeingboy »

Not much left...completely burnt out
---------- ADS -----------
 
Attachments
crash7.jpg
crash7.jpg (324.67 KiB) Viewed 3010 times
karmutzen
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 153
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2013 8:40 pm

Re: 182 crash at Langley

Post by karmutzen »

Not impressed with the fire suppression response at Langley. Isn't there a response standard for that category airport, as shown in the CFS? The airport is in the middle of town, surrounded by fire stations. If the pilot hadn't gotten out he would have be toast, no pun intended.

And what about training pilots to shut the fuel off on a forced approach (or after landing/crashing).

The way trucks are engineered for roof integrity for rollover protection, that must have been some vertical impact on it, like full stall drop.

Langley isn't friendly to engine failures.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
‘Bob’
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1120
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2021 10:19 am

Re: 182 crash at Langley

Post by ‘Bob’ »

karmutzen wrote: Wed May 03, 2023 8:48 am Not impressed with the fire suppression response at Langley. Isn't there a response standard for that category airport, as shown in the CFS? The airport is in the middle of town, surrounded by fire stations. If the pilot hadn't gotten out he would have be toast, no pun intended.
Where in the CFS are you looking? There’s no designated category for ARFF. Probably because there’s no sched service from aircraft that require it. Lots of airports with sched services like Terrace and Prince George only have ARFF available during windows of sched service or on call out.

In the middle of town surrounded by fire stations makes response better, but they still have to get the call, they still have to get to the airport, they still have to get through the gate and on site, and nobody is going to survive if they can’t get out of a burning aircraft. Heck, even the two minutes (I believe) for ARFF to be on site from the crash button wouldn’t be enough in a lot of cases… or if they were successfully extricated they would likely succumb to smoke inhalation or burns later on.
And what about training pilots to shut the fuel off on a forced approach (or after landing/crashing).
This is crucial as well as turning off electrical.. but will only reduce the risk not eliminate it.
The way trucks are engineered for roof integrity for rollover protection, that must have been some vertical impact on it, like full stall drop.
That’s an older truck… and rollover is based on a very blunt object (the ground) vs the localized impact from a landing gear or engine that hit it. Kind of like how an eggshell can hold the weight of a hen.. but puncture with the press of a finger.
Langley isn't friendly to engine failures.
You can say that again. Unfortunately this will be more ammunition for NIMBYs.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Big Pistons Forever
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5956
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: West Coast

Re: 182 crash at Langley

Post by Big Pistons Forever »

ARFF’s job is not to save the airplane it is too save the people in it.
---------- ADS -----------
 
7ECA
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1394
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2014 4:33 pm

Re: 182 crash at Langley

Post by 7ECA »

Latest rumour is both the driver and aircraft passenger are "okay", while the PIC has a fairly serious head injury which is why he was medevac'd.

If you look at the photos, two people were extricated and led away from the aircraft prior to the fire taking hold. Kudos to the bystanders at Langley for jumping into action and getting both occupants out of the aircraft.
---------- ADS -----------
 
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 7039
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: 182 crash at Langley

Post by digits_ »

‘Bob’ wrote: Wed May 03, 2023 11:00 am
And what about training pilots to shut the fuel off on a forced approach (or after landing/crashing).
This is crucial as well as turning off electrical.. but will only reduce the risk not eliminate it.
Turning electrical off before the crash: great if it doesn't distract you too much.
Turning electrical off after the crash in a damaged aircraft: this can cause a fire, don't do that. Just get out and let the power burn out. If it catches fire when you're out, so be it.
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: 182 crash at Langley

Post by photofly »

‘Bob’ wrote: Wed May 03, 2023 11:00 am Kind of like how an eggshell can hold the weight of a hen.. but puncture with the press of a finger.
Lol. I don't think the hen actually sits on the egg.
---------- ADS -----------
 
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 7039
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: 182 crash at Langley

Post by digits_ »

photofly wrote: Wed May 03, 2023 2:00 pm
‘Bob’ wrote: Wed May 03, 2023 11:00 am Kind of like how an eggshell can hold the weight of a hen.. but puncture with the press of a finger.
Lol. I don't think the hen actually sits on the egg.
They sure do. With single eggs a lot of the weight is distributed on the ground and you could likely argue that they are touching the ground more than the egg. But if they are sitting on 20 eggs, virtually all the weight of the hen is supported by the eggs. By multiple eggs of course, but still, by the eggs.

The most dangerous part is the touching of the eggs amongst themselves, that seems to be what causes them to break most. Other than a naughty hen that would peck her own eggs to eat them.
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: 182 crash at Langley

Post by photofly »

digits_ wrote: Wed May 03, 2023 2:05 pm
photofly wrote: Wed May 03, 2023 2:00 pm
‘Bob’ wrote: Wed May 03, 2023 11:00 am Kind of like how an eggshell can hold the weight of a hen.. but puncture with the press of a finger.
Lol. I don't think the hen actually sits on the egg.
They sure do. With single eggs a lot of the weight is distributed on the ground and you could likely argue that they are touching the ground more than the egg. But if they are sitting on 20 eggs, virtually all the weight of the hen is supported by the eggs. By multiple eggs of course, but still, by the eggs.
I need to do some experiments.

Also need to check what the babysitter has been doing.
---------- ADS -----------
 
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
User avatar
PilotDAR
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4113
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 6:46 pm
Location: Near CNJ4 Orillia, Ontario

Re: 182 crash at Langley

Post by PilotDAR »

Isn't there a response standard for that category airport, as shown in the CFS?
Be careful what you ask for... A local airport did that, and you were covered for crash/fire/rescue in your Cessna for every landing - and every landing had a $10 fee on top of the airport landing fee for the service being available. I think they've withdrawn it, but I haven't been back anyway...
---------- ADS -----------
 
pelmet
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 7978
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:48 pm

Re: 182 crash at Langley

Post by pelmet »

Low approach. Know another guy that did similar and hit a fence...........

C-GIDY, a privately registered Cessna 182P, was conducting a visual flight rules sightseeing flight
from, returning to, Langley (CYNJ), BC, with the pilot and one passenger on board. When the
aircraft returned to CYNJ, a straight in approach to Runway 25 was conducted. The aircraft was
observed to be low on the approach. The aircraft struck a vehicle on the public road approximately
450 feet east of the runway’s displaced threshold. It then impacted the airport perimeter fence
approximately 60 feet west of the initial impact and slid a further 30 feet, before it came to rest
against a berm. A post-impact fire started shortly after. The passenger and pilot were extracted
from the aircraft with the assistance of bystanders. The driver of the impacted vehicle was
transferred to hospital via ground ambulance with minor injuries. The pilot sustained serious
injuries and the passenger sustained minor injuries; both were airlifted to hospital. Firefighters
extinguished the aircraft fire and the associated grass fire; the aircraft was destroyed.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Accidents, Incidents & Overdue Aircraft”