Instructor V.S PPC
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog
-
- Rank 2
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 7:56 am
Instructor V.S PPC
Ok I am getting ready to get flamed on this one, so go easy on me its a honest question. I mean no disrespect at all, nor do I plan on doing this just something that has been bugging me.
So you finish your CPL and decide to get your instructors rating in order to get a "flying job", so that sets you back 6-7 grand right?
How is buying a PPC on a navajo or something like that any different? Your still spending or in some people cases getting someone to spend that money in order to get a flying job. Right?
Again not trying to get people pissed at me because I know I am playing with fire here but its something I have been trying to figure out.
So you finish your CPL and decide to get your instructors rating in order to get a "flying job", so that sets you back 6-7 grand right?
How is buying a PPC on a navajo or something like that any different? Your still spending or in some people cases getting someone to spend that money in order to get a flying job. Right?
Again not trying to get people pissed at me because I know I am playing with fire here but its something I have been trying to figure out.
You probably will get flamed...I'll put in some input before that happens.
So great, you've got 250hrs and a -31 PPC. Now what? Hope to get lucky and land a right-seat spot and build your twin time. I'm not aware of many (read any) operators that would let a 250hr 'captain' drive their navajo commercially. Well, that's not completely accurate, there is one instance that I know of where that has happened in a BN-2...but it was a unique situation.
Either insurance mins or company policies prevent this from happening. While you fly right seat, waiting the upgrade, you are still drastically shy of the required PIC time.
You might get lucky and find an operator that will let pilots built time right-seat in piston-twin, then upgrade to PIC on a light single (typically a cessna variant). After your experience, TT and PIC have risen, then left-seat on a light piston-twin. Not common...but not unheard of either.
I have heard of operators up north hiring rampies/office staff to fill right seat turbine spots...then onto the singles for PIC time...
Please keep in mind that it may hurt your rep. and potentially future employment buying a PPC.
What does everyone else think?
So great, you've got 250hrs and a -31 PPC. Now what? Hope to get lucky and land a right-seat spot and build your twin time. I'm not aware of many (read any) operators that would let a 250hr 'captain' drive their navajo commercially. Well, that's not completely accurate, there is one instance that I know of where that has happened in a BN-2...but it was a unique situation.
Either insurance mins or company policies prevent this from happening. While you fly right seat, waiting the upgrade, you are still drastically shy of the required PIC time.
You might get lucky and find an operator that will let pilots built time right-seat in piston-twin, then upgrade to PIC on a light single (typically a cessna variant). After your experience, TT and PIC have risen, then left-seat on a light piston-twin. Not common...but not unheard of either.
I have heard of operators up north hiring rampies/office staff to fill right seat turbine spots...then onto the singles for PIC time...
Please keep in mind that it may hurt your rep. and potentially future employment buying a PPC.
What does everyone else think?
-
- Rank 2
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 7:56 am
-
- Rank 2
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 7:56 am
-
- Rank 1
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:37 pm
When you get an instructor's rating you arent taking anybodies job. You are getting a rating which allows you to fly, but still pay dues by teaching others to fly. This industry will always need instructors, without them we dont get new rampies, uhh I mean pilots.
I carry my crucifix
Under my deathlist
Forward my mail to me in hell
Liars and the martyrs
Lost faith in The Father
Long lost in the wishing well
Wild side
Under my deathlist
Forward my mail to me in hell
Liars and the martyrs
Lost faith in The Father
Long lost in the wishing well
Wild side
-
- Rank 8
- Posts: 896
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 12:12 am
- Location: Cyberspace
Paying for an instructor rating is not the same thing as paying for a PPC. Paying for an instructor rating is the same thing as paying for a Multi IFR, or a float rating. How many would ever realistically expect an employer to pay for their Multi IFR? A CPL with one or more of these basic ratings are a prerequisite to employability. Once it comes time to train you on a specific a/c type operated by them, that's when an employers responsibility kicks in.
Aviation- the hardest way possible to make an easy living!
"You can bomb the world to pieces, but you can't bomb it into peace!" Michael Franti- Spearhead
"Trust everyone, but cut the cards". My Grandma.
"You can bomb the world to pieces, but you can't bomb it into peace!" Michael Franti- Spearhead
"Trust everyone, but cut the cards". My Grandma.
-
- Rank 1
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 8:45 pm
-
- Rank 2
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 7:56 am
I have to jump in.
When you obtain an instructors rating you are qualified to instruct.
If you go and buy a PPC, you are, in my opinion, in most cases,not qualified to fly the plane with 200 hrs and a PPC. What the intent seems to be, is that by buying a PPC, a sleazy operator who wants to cut costs without interest for safety, will hire me to save money....I think there are enough examples of these operators and the ultimate results. It is really short sighted thinking and takes an attitude of "if I have the PPC I am qualified"
Instead of a PPC, why not get some real training through flight safety or sim com...You will get first class training....but you wont get a PPC.....if you are really interested in being a safe , professional pilot, this seems to me to be the more logical route.
Just as an aside , our company has a policy of not hiring anyone with a bought PPC or anyone who has an intitial PPC that is less than 6 months old....guess why?
When you obtain an instructors rating you are qualified to instruct.
If you go and buy a PPC, you are, in my opinion, in most cases,not qualified to fly the plane with 200 hrs and a PPC. What the intent seems to be, is that by buying a PPC, a sleazy operator who wants to cut costs without interest for safety, will hire me to save money....I think there are enough examples of these operators and the ultimate results. It is really short sighted thinking and takes an attitude of "if I have the PPC I am qualified"
Instead of a PPC, why not get some real training through flight safety or sim com...You will get first class training....but you wont get a PPC.....if you are really interested in being a safe , professional pilot, this seems to me to be the more logical route.
Just as an aside , our company has a policy of not hiring anyone with a bought PPC or anyone who has an intitial PPC that is less than 6 months old....guess why?
I hope one day the industry will need EXPERIENCED instructorsHoov wrote:When you get an instructor's rating you arent taking anybodies job. You are getting a rating which allows you to fly, but still pay dues by teaching others to fly. This industry will always need instructors, without them we dont get new rampies, uhh I mean pilots.

How come in the military you can fly an Hawk or a CF18 with 200 hours but we cannot fly a PA31?
- Schools and instructors are not doing their job
- Military pilots are a "special" peoples born with 3 balls
- This all "supply-demand" and "building hours" thins is BS and is a way to have cheap labor in the industry
Of course economics has an effect on the pricing of a commodity such as pilots but ... it is worth mentioning that military flight training is much, much more stringent than civilian pilot training, which mostly consists of "go north and be tough".
It is worth thinking about that at the next Canadian airshow you attend, the CF-188 demo pilot likely does not have enough hours in his logbook to get a job flying a 'ho straight and level from point A to point B.
It is worth thinking about that at the next Canadian airshow you attend, the CF-188 demo pilot likely does not have enough hours in his logbook to get a job flying a 'ho straight and level from point A to point B.
I agree with you, military training is more though (or school are not good enough).Hedley wrote:Of course economics has an effect on the pricing of a commodity such as pilots but ... it is worth mentioning that military flight training is much, much more stringent than civilian pilot training, which mostly consists of "go north and be tough".
It is worth thinking about that at the next Canadian airshow you attend, the CF-188 demo pilot likely does not have enough hours in his logbook to get a job flying a 'ho straight and level from point A to point B.
Don't you think that if we had 50-60 years old former military/commercial instructor, we would:
- don't need to go up north and try to kill ourselves
- get a jet-job sooner (like in Europe)
- Gain experience from our instructors
- Get a better salary when we find a job
-
- Rank 2
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 8:37 pm
- Location: Center of the Universe (aka. YYZ)
Multi IFR, at night in IMC and ice, low vis and down to minimums into say, oh... I don't know, how's about a circling NDB DME arc approach.
250 hours and a PPC. In a navajo. Yeah right.... better change your diaper prior to commencing descent.
250 hours and a PPC. In a navajo. Yeah right.... better change your diaper prior to commencing descent.
Please, no more witty sayings, smug advice, or bitter posts from low timers. Pay your dues. Be patient...
-
- Rank 1
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 8:45 pm
- hopefullyI agree with you, military training is more though (or school are not good enough).
Don't you think that if we had 50-60 years old former military/commercial instructor, we would:
- don't need to go up north and try to kill ourselves
- get a jet-job sooner (like in Europe)
- Gain experience from our instructors
- Get a better salary when we find a job
- maybe
- most likely
- no
- hopefullyI agree with you, military training is more though (or school are not good enough).
Don't you think that if we had 50-60 years old former military/commercial instructor, we would:
- don't need to go up north and try to kill ourselves
- get a jet-job sooner (like in Europe)
- Gain experience from our instructors
- Get a better salary when we find a job
- maybe
- most likely
- no