For the 1900 Drivers...

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
Raybanman
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 266
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 3:05 pm
Location: Not in Florida Damnit

For the 1900 Drivers...

Post by Raybanman »

When I flew the 1900, the abbreviated type designator was BE190 then changed to BE02 (which is what is stamped on my license). Someone recently questioned this and I'd like to know what the rest of you folks have printed on your license? BE02 or BE190? What time frame was yours added? Mine was in 2001.

Cheers,
PP
---------- ADS -----------
 
Some people are like slinkies: Not much good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs.
Top
User avatar
Apache64_
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 322
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 8:07 pm

Post by Apache64_ »

Mine says BE02, and was freshly minted last month.


Cheers

Apache
---------- ADS -----------
 
Top
Caracrane
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 713
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 3:26 pm
Location: Québec City

Post by Caracrane »

Be02 in 2000. Cheers
---------- ADS -----------
 
The Best safety device in any aircarft is a well-paid crew.
Top
Raybanman
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 266
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 3:05 pm
Location: Not in Florida Damnit

Post by Raybanman »

Thanks guys :)

Cheers,
PP
---------- ADS -----------
 
Some people are like slinkies: Not much good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs.
Top
zither
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 40
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 5:49 am
Location: Moins loin

Post by zither »

BE02 as well, in 2006...
---------- ADS -----------
 
Top
linecrew
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1900
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:53 am
Location: On final so get off the damn runway!

Post by linecrew »

That's funny..because a BE02 is the ICAO designator for the Beech 200 and up until a certain point was also used for the 1900. When they finally realized the two were very different aircraft the code for the 1900 was changed to B190. I wonder why your licences still say BE02??
---------- ADS -----------
 
Top
User avatar
Airtids
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1643
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 12:56 am
Location: The Rock

Post by Airtids »

Apache64_ wrote:Mine says BE02, and was freshly minted last month.


Cheers

Apache
Congratulations, BTW. 8)
---------- ADS -----------
 
Aviation- the hardest way possible to make an easy living!
"You can bomb the world to pieces, but you can't bomb it into peace!" Michael Franti- Spearhead
"Trust everyone, but cut the cards". My Grandma.
Top
User avatar
D5GRVTY
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 148
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 7:06 pm

Post by D5GRVTY »

BE02, first typed on early 2006, I also have the king air 200 which appears as BE20.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Top
Liftdump
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 330
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 9:34 pm
Location: Earth

Post by Liftdump »

BE02 is the ICAO identifier for very ugly aircraft. Sorry guys
---------- ADS -----------
 
Top
wha happen
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 963
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 11:39 am

Post by wha happen »

BE-02, minted in january.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Its the way she goes boys, its the way she goes.

Lets sacrifice him to the crops.
Top
mbav8r
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2325
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:11 am
Location: Manitoba

Post by mbav8r »

Linecrew wrote:
That's funny..because a BE02 is the ICAO designator for the Beech 200 and up until a certain point was also used for the 1900. When they finally realized the two were very different aircraft the code for the 1900 was changed to B190. I wonder why your licences still say BE02??
They must have change the 200 to BE20 cause thats what mine is.
---------- ADS -----------
 
"Stand-by, I'm inverted"
Top
rigpiggy
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2949
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:17 pm
Location: west to east and west again

Post by rigpiggy »

Because be19 is a musketeer. Just more Govt. Horseexcrement. kind of like the hubbub about nunavut's postal suffix. NU
---------- ADS -----------
 
Top
linecrew
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1900
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:53 am
Location: On final so get off the damn runway!

Post by linecrew »

Try it yourself. Obviously they are not conforming to the ICAO standard.

Here's an online designator look-up.
http://www.icao.int/anb/ais/8643/index.cfm
---------- ADS -----------
 
Top
linecrew
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1900
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:53 am
Location: On final so get off the damn runway!

Post by linecrew »

Try it yourself. Obviously they are not conforming to the ICAO standard.

Here's an online designator look-up.
http://www.icao.int/anb/ais/8643/index.cfm
---------- ADS -----------
 
Top
TG
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2102
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2004 11:32 am
Location: Around

Post by TG »

linecrew wrote:Try it yourself. Obviously they are not conforming to the ICAO standard.

Here's an online designator look-up.
http://www.icao.int/anb/ais/8643/index.cfm
True, for example a Casa 212 will come as CS12 instead of C212.
Not that they are many of them farting around in Canada :smt003
---------- ADS -----------
 
Top
Raybanman
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 266
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 3:05 pm
Location: Not in Florida Damnit

Post by Raybanman »

Ah ok, therin must lie the confusion that caused the party in question to ask me about the designator. I suppose I could just clarify it on a resume like this: "BE02 - B1900D" or designate it simply "B1900"??

Cheers,
PP
---------- ADS -----------
 
Some people are like slinkies: Not much good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs.
Top
fougner
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 8:55 am

Post by fougner »

.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by fougner on Tue Oct 24, 2023 12:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
User avatar
A Regulator
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 199
Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 6:21 pm

Post by A Regulator »

I have also seen this when conducting audits/ramp inspections. It was a typo on the type rating application form and I have seen this on some other aircraft.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Top
Raybanman
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 266
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 3:05 pm
Location: Not in Florida Damnit

Post by Raybanman »

Which was the typo you've seen? BE20 instead of BE02? or BE190 instead of BE02?

Cheers,
PP
---------- ADS -----------
 
Some people are like slinkies: Not much good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs.
Top
RC320
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 12:09 am
Location: Fort McMurray

Post by RC320 »

linecrew wrote:That's funny..because a BE02 is the ICAO designator for the Beech 200 and up until a certain point was also used for the 1900. When they finally realized the two were very different aircraft the code for the 1900 was changed to B190. I wonder why your licences still say BE02??
BE20 is the desig for B200
---------- ADS -----------
 
Top
User avatar
Pratt
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 954
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: YVR

Post by Pratt »

Mine in 1989 first came out as BE 190 then on the next licence issue it was BE02, had us wondering then also.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Top
User avatar
oldtimer
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2296
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Calgary

Post by oldtimer »

We have the same problem with the Beech King Air 350. The factory calls it a B300(350) and ATC calls it a B350 but my type rating calls it a Be3B.
Apache/Aztec/Turbo Aztec was a problem, Navajo/Cheyenne, the list goes on and on.
Metros are easy. Mention MUD UGLY and everyone knows what you are talking about
---------- ADS -----------
 
The average pilot, despite the somewhat swaggering exterior, is very much capable of such feelings as love, affection, intimacy and caring.
These feelings just don't involve anyone else.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”