Tax the rich! (on second thought...)

This forum is for non aviation related topics, political debate, random thoughts, and everything else that just doesn't seem to fit in the normal forums. ALL FORUM RULES STILL APPLY.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore

Locked
BigB
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 211
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:29 pm

Tax the rich! (on second thought...)

Post by BigB »

This story may have been posted here before, however it still is thought provoking.

Income Taxes Explained:
Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that's what they decided to do.

The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve. "Since you are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20."Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share?' They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.

So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay. And so:

The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).
The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.

"I only got a dollar out of the $20,"declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man," but he got $10!"

"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than I!"

"That's true!!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!"

"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, boys and girls, is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.


For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Phaedrus
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 290
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 11:09 am
Location: Western Canada

Post by Phaedrus »

And that is why politicians don't cut taxes very often... 8)
---------- ADS -----------
 
Oh. Your. God.
- Bender
altiplano
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5932
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 2:24 pm

Post by altiplano »

That story is just that "a story".

A bit simplified to really portray the actual issue and slanted to a achieve the desired meaning.
---------- ADS -----------
 
dxprguy
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 68
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 10:38 pm

Post by dxprguy »

Its been a while since I have posted... But wow, I hope those of you who voted for the NDP, Block and Liberals in the last election noticed that they voted AGAINST a TAX CUT today!.. Let's keep them taxes high I say....better that the government piss away my hard earned money.

Honestly, I don't know what I am gonna do with myself... a federal government that actually says they are going to do something.. then has the audacity to actually do it! This is damn near un-Canadian.
---------- ADS -----------
 
North Shore
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 5625
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 3:47 pm
Location: Straight outta Dundarave...

Post by North Shore »

OTOH, conventional wisdom is that you spend your way out of a recession (going into debt if necessary) and then pay off said debt during the good times. We are now into the good times, the debt is still a long way north of $400 Billion, and yet, rather than putting the bugetary surplus wholly against the debt, it's tax cut time. Alternatively, there's a whole lot of infrastructure that needs to be rebuilt, toys for the military, or education/healthcare etc that the money could be spent on...
Pay off the debt first, use the savings from that for some small tax relief, and then, once the debt is down into the $10's of billions, and we've rebuilt our infrastructure, cut the taxes..

IMHO, of course..
---------- ADS -----------
 
Say, what's that mountain goat doing up here in the mist?
Happiness is V1 at Thompson!
Ass, Licence, Job. In that order.
User avatar
Dust Devil
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4027
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 10:55 am
Location: Riderville

Post by Dust Devil »

The federal government should not be collecting dollars for infrastucture. The provinces and municipalities should be doing that. I do agree that aggresive debt reduction is important that's why I typically like the balanced approach the Conservatives have done in the past by reducing taxes based on the interest saved by a lump sum being put on the debt.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Locked

Return to “The Water Cooler”