tiggermoth wrote: Corporate Joe, I never said I wasn't a jackass, in fact I am proud to be one!!
You're proud to be a jackass, you call me a jackass, does that mean you're proud of me?
tiggermoth wrote: Now, "your liberty to joke about it does not outweigh my liberty to bark at ignorance." What kind of BS is that. Everyone is entitled to there opinion, I think you have said this before yourself. We have expressed our opinions, you have expressed yours, great. Where the problem is, is that you think that it is your duty to tell everyone else that our opinions are wrong and yours is right, probably the fastest way to piss of anyone.
We're not talking opinions we're talking facts. If you like the color blue over red, that's your opinion and you are entitled to it. I can tell you I like red better and it ends there. If you think 1 and 1 is 3, and you come on a public forum to say 1 and 1 is 3, then you are exposing yourself to jackasses like me who can, and most probably will, correct you. If your idea of having fun is stating incorrect facts, that's fine, as long as you accept that my idea of having fun is correcting them (according to what you say). You'll also notice that I bark at specific posters on specific topics. If that pisses them off, that's too bad, no one likes to be proven wrong. That's a risk we all expose ourselves to when we state our easily refutable personal beliefs as if they were facts.
tiggermoth wrote: As far as barking at ignorance, get a life, everyone knows about global warming and its causes/effects, you can't not know with all the media attention these days.
I wish... The reality is that not everyone knows about global warming it's causes and effects. Clearly you've missed a lot of posts which I guess explains your reaction in some way. The original poster doesn't believe in it's causes or effects, and that's something he was stating as a fact. If your interpretation is still that he was trying to be funny, then I suggest you make a small search of the forums (I sure as hell won't do it for you) and you look it up. The original statement was not an attempt at humor, it was a misinformed fact, that I CHOSE to correct. I may do it again, I may not. It's my right to do so, and nothing you post here, no matter how personal you try to make it will change that.
tiggermoth wrote: Finally, "Finally I suggest you re-read my post. I have said that you can joke about it all you want," yeah well than how about letting us do it. Refer back to my second post about letting the rest of us have our fun without you running off at the mouth.
Again, this seems to be the hard part for you. Do it all you want, but I get to do it all I want also. That's how freedom of expression works. It goes both ways. Nevertheless, I'll be honest with you, that's kind of beside the point. If the original post was really an attempt at humor, I never would have posted (even though I have the right to as much as you do). You don't have to believe that, but there's nothing else I can say or do to make you understand that. The only way is that you go look up his other posts on the topic and see for yourself.
tiggermoth wrote: Oh, I forgot, I was going to ask, When you get into the fancy corporate world, do they surgically remove your sense of humour or is corporate work so shitty that it leaves on its own??
Trying to make this personal doesn't make your arguments stronger or mine weaker, and I am sorry to inform you that I won't be doing the same. The only thing you are doing by trying to make this personal is increasing the likeliness of "me running my mouth" to correct you.