Doc wrote:
The winter games? I'll watch the men's and the women's downhills! Any one of those "chicks" could kick the snot out "the professor"! And that's, the bottom line.
My first post remarked upon the complete lack of interest shown by Canadians as far as this issue is concerned, and had
nothing to do with how I would fare against them in their sport. How I might fare against a skirt on a ski jump is about the most irrelevant thing I can imagine. Talk about not GARA...
And as The Globe and Mail remarked in their editorial Saturday, this whole thing is stupid. It's just another case of everyone trying to pretend that we're all equal in our abilities/capabilities, regardless of race, gender, ethnicity, etc. And
that is a load of horseshit, whether it's politically correct to say so or not.
"
But the athletes' fight is a political sports fight; it is not one that belongs in any Canadian courtroom. Only one of the nine plaintiffs is Canadian, and she has retired from competitive ski jumping. So we have the highly unusual circumstance of Slovenian, Norwegian and American athletes using the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in a dispute with a Lausanne-based sports body. Further harming the women's case is the bizarre strategy of asking the court, in the event that a women's ski jumping event is not held during the Games, to bar the men's ski jumping competition. Male ski jumpers had no role in the IOC decision. They are innocent parties in this fight. Yet their female counterparts seen to believe that two wrongs would make a right. More than unsportswomanlike, it is a sullen and nasty tactic."