717-200 ?

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
Mike B
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 82
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 5:47 am
Location: Halton Hills, Ontario

717-200 ?

Post by Mike B »

Anybody know why there hasn't been a visit of a 717 to YYZ yet... If there is a scheduled service, can somebody hook me up with the times & dates..

Cheers...

Mike....
---------- ADS -----------
 
Lost in Saigon
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 852
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 9:35 pm

Re: 717-200 ?

Post by Lost in Saigon »

I don't think any of these airlines fly to YYZ.
As of August 2008, a total of 154 Boeing 717-200 airplanes were in airline service with:

AirTran Airways (87)
Midwest Airlines (25)
National Jet (for QantasLink) (14)
Hawaiian Airlines (11)
Aerolíneas de Baleares (8)
Turkmenistan Airlines (7)
Bangkok Airways (2)
---------- ADS -----------
 
Doc
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 9241
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 6:28 am

Re: 717-200 ?

Post by Doc »

Isn't that an MD 80 after Boeing took over....there really was no B717....it's just a jet with a new name.
---------- ADS -----------
 
iflyforpie
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8132
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:25 pm
Location: Winterfell...

Re: 717-200 ?

Post by iflyforpie »

It was the MD-95. It was designed by MD to be a replacement for the DC-9-10s and an entry into the regional market. Other than basic structure it has little in common with the MD-80.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Geez did I say that....? Or just think it....?
C-GPFG
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 540
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 5:26 pm
Location: CYYZ

Re: 717-200 ?

Post by C-GPFG »

Doc wrote:....there really was no B717....it's just a jet with a new name.
Just enough to be different aircraft in my opinion..along with turbo-fan vs. turbo-jet the flight decks are totally different..

Image

Image
---------- ADS -----------
 
iflyforpie
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8132
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:25 pm
Location: Winterfell...

Re: 717-200 ?

Post by iflyforpie »

They're still both 737s :wink:
---------- ADS -----------
 
Attachments
737-200.jpg
737-200.jpg (340.38 KiB) Viewed 3897 times
cockpit.jpg
cockpit.jpg (38.71 KiB) Viewed 3891 times
Geez did I say that....? Or just think it....?
linecrew
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1900
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:53 am
Location: On final so get off the damn runway!

Re: 717-200 ?

Post by linecrew »

Doc wrote:Isn't that an MD 80 after Boeing took over....there really was no B717....it's just a jet with a new name.

It was the MD-95..shorter version of the MD-90, both had the largest engines ever worn by the DC-9 family.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
LegoMan
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 596
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 7:37 pm

Re: 717-200 ?

Post by LegoMan »

American Airlines brings in their 717 from time to time. I've seen in on numerous occasions usually in the morning
---------- ADS -----------
 
linecrew
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1900
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:53 am
Location: On final so get off the damn runway!

Re: 717-200 ?

Post by linecrew »

LegoMan wrote:American Airlines brings in their 717 from time to time. I've seen in on numerous occasions usually in the morning
American Airlines??
As of August 2008, a total of 154 Boeing 717-200 airplanes were in airline service with:

AirTran Airways (87)
Midwest Airlines (25)
National Jet (for QantasLink) (14)
Hawaiian Airlines (11)
Aerolíneas de Baleares (8)
Turkmenistan Airlines (7)
Bangkok Airways (2)
---------- ADS -----------
 
What Flaps?
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:02 pm

Re: 717-200 ?

Post by What Flaps? »

American Airlines flies both the MD-80 and the MD-83. While they both look like the B-717 they are larger and a fair bit older. Here is a photo of one from American's website. There also slowly being replaced by the 737.
Image
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
LegoMan
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 596
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 7:37 pm

Re: 717-200 ?

Post by LegoMan »

Yes, American used to operate a fleet of 28 of the 717s after they took over TWA. They used to fly them along with the MD82 and MD83 into YYZ. AA retired them in 2002. AA kept the TWA titles I remember.

Image
---------- ADS -----------
 
linecrew
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1900
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:53 am
Location: On final so get off the damn runway!

Re: 717-200 ?

Post by linecrew »

Exactly...but your post implied that they were still with AA and still coming in to YYZ.

LegoMan wrote:American Airlines brings in their 717 from time to time. I've seen in on numerous occasions usually in the morning
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
LegoMan
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 596
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 7:37 pm

Re: 717-200 ?

Post by LegoMan »

sorry my fault
---------- ADS -----------
 
snowshoe
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 138
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 12:03 pm
Location: 85.00W 60.00N

Re: 717-200 ?

Post by snowshoe »

did boeing really assign "717" as the model # to that douglas design?
seems that way back in the day when i still had most of my hair, that model was used on a varient of the 707. to be even more foggy, i think it was the kc-135 stratotanker. the tankers were stationed at a sac base about 40 miles from the farm and they and the 52's were over our heads everyday.of course that was many years and many beer&stories ago. perhaps i have two totally different facts mixed. hoping someone can confirm.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Q: How many Microsoft Programmers does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
A: It cannot be done. You will need to upgrade your house.
Lost in Saigon
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 852
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 9:35 pm

Re: 717-200 ?

Post by Lost in Saigon »

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_717
After McDonnell Douglas merged with Boeing in August 1997,[4] most industry observers expected that Boeing would cancel development of the MD-95. However, Boeing would go forward with the design under a new name, Boeing 717. Some believed Boeing had apparently skipped the 717 model designation when the 720 and then the 727 followed the 707. The 717 name had been used within the company to refer to the KC-135 Stratotanker. 717 had also been used to promote an early design of the 720 to airlines before it was modified to meet market demands. A Boeing historian notes that the air force plane had the designation "717-100" and the commercial airliner had the designation "717-200".[5] The lack of a widespread use of the 717 name left it available to rebrand the MD-95.
---------- ADS -----------
 
rigpiggy
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2947
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:17 pm
Location: west to east and west again

Re: 717-200 ?

Post by rigpiggy »

linecrew wrote:
Doc wrote:Isn't that an MD 80 after Boeing took over....there really was no B717....it's just a jet with a new name.

It was the MD-95..shorter version of the MD-90, both had the largest engines ever worn by the DC-9 family.



Actually the MD90 had the IAE 2500's, and the 95 the BR715's, the MD 80 series used the pratt jt8d-200 series
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”