Denied

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
Donald
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2451
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:34 am
Location: Canada

Denied

Post by Donald »

This sounds a little strange, does this sort of thing happen often?
CADORS Number: 2009C0415
Detail InformationUser Name: Ridley, Rod
Date: 2009/02/19
Further Action Required: No
O.P.I.: System Safety
Narrative: AOJ 572, a Gulfstream V operated by Avcon Jet of Austria, was en route from Paris-Le Bourget to Los Angeles and near DARUB intersection when the aircraft was denied entry into Canadian airspace. In consultation with the FAA, NORAD and Transport Canada, it was determined that the aircraft and/or passengers did not have the required documentation to land in the United States and Edmonton ACC then denied clearance into Canada and also advised the crew that the aircraft would not be permitted to land in Canada either. The aircraft held in Reykjavik Oceanic airspace for some time before returning to point of origin.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
flying4dollars
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1494
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:56 am

Re: Denied

Post by flying4dollars »

well that sounds cheap!

doh! :x
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
pilotbzh
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 612
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 7:33 am
Location: yyz

Re: Denied

Post by pilotbzh »

no more than 30Kcad$ of fuel anyways....
---------- ADS -----------
 
swordfish
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 745
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 12:18 am
Location: CYZF

Re: Denied

Post by swordfish »

Bizarre. No documentation to enter USA, therefore denied landing in Canada?? I wonder how that little tidbit surfaced in the first place.
---------- ADS -----------
 
E-Flyer
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 985
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 9:43 pm

Re: Denied

Post by E-Flyer »

I wonder how that little tidbit surfaced in the first place.
Simple,

Canada is the united states bitch. :prayer:

No Offense to anybody, I am canadian my self.
---------- ADS -----------
 
yfly
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 285
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 8:28 am

Re: Denied

Post by yfly »

Make sure you check your NOTAMs! The TSA now requires an exemption to depart nearly any foreign land destined for the US. This process takes about a week although they ask for 10 days.

It applies to all departure points except Canada, Mexico, Bahamas and Bermuda. This for non-US registered aircraft.

If this was the reason, the could have landed in Bermuda, then flown to LAX. There in lies the stupidity of the TSA and their ill thought rules.

Why it was denied access to Canada, I don't know, unless someone was on a no-fly list or we really are the "bitch" to the US.
---------- ADS -----------
 
foxmoth
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 164
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 2:36 pm

Re: Denied

Post by foxmoth »

maybe it was Al Kyda Air and Osama was onboard?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Pratt X 3
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 900
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 12:19 pm

Re: Denied

Post by Pratt X 3 »

foxmoth wrote:maybe it was Al Kyda Air and Osama was onboard?
Yeah, they wouldn't want to catch that guy. They would then have to designate another "evil-doer" to spark fear into the hearts of the innocent citizens of the Good Ole' US of A. I can't wait for them to put up actual physical barriers to keep out the foreigners in their scary airplanes. Maybe blimps with chain-link fence strung between them. I hope that new TV show about Homeland Security spotlights that initiative.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Have Pratts - Will Travel
Liquid Charlie
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1461
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:40 am
Location: YXL
Contact:

Re: Denied

Post by Liquid Charlie »

Doesn't matter where you go in the world you need the proper permits and over flight permissions -- been that way long before 9/11
---------- ADS -----------
 
Black Air has no Lift - Extra Fuel has no Weight

ACTPA :kriz:
pushyboss
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 174
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 1:54 pm

Re: Denied

Post by pushyboss »

Actually it's aircraft registered to Canada, Mexico, Bahamas, and Bermuda that are allowed access. Just landing a Yemense registered aircraft in Bermuda would not gain you access stateside.
---------- ADS -----------
 
yfly
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 285
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 8:28 am

Re: Denied

Post by yfly »

Liquid Charlie wrote:Doesn't matter where you go in the world you need the proper permits and over flight permissions -- been that way long before 9/11
pushyboss wrote:Actually it's aircraft registered to Canada, Mexico, Bahamas, and Bermuda that are allowed access. Just landing a Yemense registered aircraft in Bermuda would not gain you access stateside.
For a Customs overflight, that is correct. The TSA Exemption is a different animal and has only been in place since Oct 08. It has caught more than a few off guard thinking they had looked after everything by securing a Customs overflight.
---------- ADS -----------
 
2R
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4328
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 2:25 pm
Location: left coast

Re: Denied

Post by 2R »

I feel safer now :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Pratt X 3
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 900
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 12:19 pm

Re: Denied

Post by Pratt X 3 »

Of course there have been permits before but to deny entry into Canadian airspace due to not meeting a US requirement is a bit too much. Why not allow them to land at the first Canadian port of entry so that the proper notifications could be made? Are we succumbing to the paranoia that the mighty Department of Homeland Security is creating to ensure a bunch of government stooges keep their jobs and funding? It was an Austrian registered plane; not Iranian or Syrian or North Korean or whoever the "bad guys" are this week. The worst thing is that they are now treating Canadians this way. You can't even dangle a wingtip over the border without giving them all the details of who is onboard. I hate to sound like a conspiracy theory guy but this is getting a little bit ridiculous in my opinion. What will be next?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Have Pratts - Will Travel
2milefinal
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 429
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 7:36 pm

Re: Denied

Post by 2milefinal »

"I hate to sound like a conspiracy theory guy but this is getting a little bit ridiculous in my opinion. What will be next?"

TSA check points at all FBOs. I cant wait for that.
---------- ADS -----------
 
yfly
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 285
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 8:28 am

Re: Denied

Post by yfly »

2milefinal wrote:"I hate to sound like a conspiracy theory guy but this is getting a little bit ridiculous in my opinion. What will be next?"

TSA check points at all FBOs. I cant wait for that.
That has already started. 2 east coast airports recently where departing crew and pax were frisked on departure. Now mandatory eAPIS is commencing as well. The convenient means of travel for execs is becoming very inconvenient.

The TSA is completely out of control and in my opinion they have accomplished nothing. I guess the illusion of security is good for the traveling public.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Old Dog Flying
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1259
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 5:18 pm

Re: Denied

Post by Old Dog Flying »

Soon to come into effect will be the Large Aircraft Security Procedures which will require every flight of every aircraft over 12500 lbs to have a TSA security clearance permit before flight and in some cases the TSA will designate which of these flights will require a Skycop on board...and this is for domestic as well as others. And light aircraft already have to file a passenger manifest and then get permission from the TSA to enter or leave the good old USofA.

Didn't a certain European regime pull this sort of thing in the 1930s?
---------- ADS -----------
 
yfly
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 285
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 8:28 am

Re: Denied

Post by yfly »

Old Dog Flying wrote:Soon to come into effect will be the Large Aircraft Security Procedures which will require every flight of every aircraft over 12500 lbs to have a TSA security clearance permit before flight and in some cases the TSA will designate which of these flights will require a Skycop on board...and this is for domestic as well as others. And light aircraft already have to file a passenger manifest and then get permission from the TSA to enter or leave the good old USofA.

Didn't a certain European regime pull this sort of thing in the 1930s?
The requirement is still not mandatory but is voluntary at this time. Another 30 days till mandatory but we may as well get started!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”