Trigana ATR Suffers Dual Engine Failure

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
User avatar
CL-Skadoo!
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 829
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 6:41 pm
Location: Intensity in Ten Cities.

Trigana ATR Suffers Dual Engine Failure

Post by CL-Skadoo! »

One fails, so they divert, the second went during the diversion. Put it down in a rice field, everyone is safe.

Fuel starvation anyone?

Trigana Air Service, ATR-42-300
Status: Preliminary

Date:
11 FEB 2010
Time: 11:50
Type: ATR-42-300
Operator: Trigana Air Service
Registration: PK-YRP
C/n / msn: 050
First flight: 1987-05-22 (22 years 9 months)
Crew: Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 5
Passengers: Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 51
Total: Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 56
Airplane damage: Minor
Location: 33 km (20.6 mls) NE of Balikpapan-Sepingan Airport (BPN) (Indonesia)
Phase: Landing (LDG)
Nature: Domestic Scheduled Passenger
Departure airport: Tanjung Redep/Berau-Kalimaru Airport (BEJ/WALK), Indonesia
Destination airport: Samarinda Airport (SRI/WALS), Indonesia
Flightnumber: 162

Narrative:
An ATR-42-300 turboprop plane, registered PK-YRP, was damaged in a forced landing in a rice field near Balikpapan-Sepingan Airport (BPN), Indonesia.
The domestic passenger flight from Tanjung Redep/Berau-Kalimaru Airport (BEJ) was approaching Samarinda (SRI) when the nr.1 engine failed. Samrinda air traffic control advised against an emergency landing there because the airport is situated in a residential area. Also, the runway length is just 1160 m (3800 ft) of the lentgh of the runway and the buildings surrounding the airport. The pilot decided to divert to Balikpapan-Sepingan Airport (BPN) which was 92 km (50 NM) to the South. En route to Balikpapan the nr.2 engine also lost power. The crew carried out a forced landing in a rice field, some five kilometers from the main road from Samarinda to Balikpapan.
---------- ADS -----------
 
GoinNowhereFast
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 372
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:35 pm

Re: Trigana ATR Suffers Dual Engine Failure

Post by GoinNowhereFast »

Based on their decision not to land at the close by, residential strip, I am guessing it isn't fuel starvation. They probably would have preferred a short runway to a rice field.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Sarcasm is the body's natural defense against stupidity
aviator2010
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 397
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 12:19 pm

Re: Trigana ATR Suffers Dual Engine Failure

Post by aviator2010 »

I am guessing it isn't fuel starvation. They probably would have preferred a short runway to a rice field.
I'm going with oil or fuel starvation. wonder if they operate 72's as well as 42's MAYDAY just did a episoed on improper fuel indicators.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Panama Jack wrote:I'm afraid I will have to agree with aviator2010
North Shore
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 5626
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 3:47 pm
Location: Straight outta Dundarave...

Re: Trigana ATR Suffers Dual Engine Failure

Post by North Shore »

I'm going with oil or fuel starvation. wonder if they operate 72's as well as 42's MAYDAY just did a episoed on improper fuel indicators.
Is there a difference in fuel capacity between the two?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Say, what's that mountain goat doing up here in the mist?
Happiness is V1 at Thompson!
Ass, Licence, Job. In that order.
whiteguy
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1059
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 1:33 pm
Location: YYC

Re: Trigana ATR Suffers Dual Engine Failure

Post by whiteguy »

North Shore wrote:
I'm going with oil or fuel starvation. wonder if they operate 72's as well as 42's MAYDAY just did a episoed on improper fuel indicators.
Is there a difference in fuel capacity between the two?
The gauges read differently between the 42 and 72.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Inverted2
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3946
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 7:46 am

Re: Trigana ATR Suffers Dual Engine Failure

Post by Inverted2 »

Id say the fuel lines were contaminated - with air. What are the odds of 2 unrelated engine failures? Couldn't be icing in the lines either, being a turboprop FL250 or below near the equator!
---------- ADS -----------
 
DEI = Didn’t Earn It
rampking
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 82
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 4:02 pm

Re: Trigana ATR Suffers Dual Engine Failure

Post by rampking »

They do in fact operate both types the 42 and the 72. I wonder.....

King
---------- ADS -----------
 
ehbuddy
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 446
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 7:55 pm
Location: Halifax

Re: Trigana ATR Suffers Dual Engine Failure

Post by ehbuddy »

I thought a mod was done so you could not intermix the fuel quantity indicators between the 42 and 72.
---------- ADS -----------
 
YCL Boy
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 75
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 10:31 pm

Re: Trigana ATR Suffers Dual Engine Failure

Post by YCL Boy »

56 Occupants on a 42 :shock: , Hummmm!
---------- ADS -----------
 
all4u
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 6:03 pm

Re: Trigana ATR Suffers Dual Engine Failure

Post by all4u »

Yep, the mod was done. Just depends on if they were using it
---------- ADS -----------
 
HuD 91gt
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 347
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 5:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Trigana ATR Suffers Dual Engine Failure

Post by HuD 91gt »

YCL Boy wrote:56 Occupants on a 42 :shock: , Hummmm!
ATR-42 Limitation is 60 Passengers. Nothing to Hummm about.
---------- ADS -----------
 
YCL Boy
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 75
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 10:31 pm

Re: Trigana ATR Suffers Dual Engine Failure

Post by YCL Boy »

Yeah ok, i realize its up to a max of 60 pax, but that is from the cockpit door to the back cabin door, no room for cargo/luggage up front right, maybe a bit in the tail and overhead bin.

Their website has a config for 50 pax, gives them about 120 Cubic feet of cargo up front, plus crew & infant maybe ???

http://www.trigana-air.com/html/module. ... et&lang=en

The pic's i saw has one prop not feathered completely, which would be normal from a forced landing procedure, probably was shut down but has not feathered yet, just a guess maybe they were unable to maintain alt on one???.

I got to say a rice field seems to be a pretty good choice.
Everybody seems to have walk away, so good job boys.
---------- ADS -----------
 
ScudRunner
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3239
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 11:58 am

Re: Trigana ATR Suffers Dual Engine Failure

Post by ScudRunner »

Ive said it before and ill say it again, Twin Engine IFR just isn't Safe.
---------- ADS -----------
 
GoinNowhereFast
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 372
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:35 pm

Re: Trigana ATR Suffers Dual Engine Failure

Post by GoinNowhereFast »

. wrote:Ive said it before and ill say it again, Twin Engine IFR just isn't Safe.
I will only fly in IMC with the B-52. A340s and 747s make me nervous :smt040
---------- ADS -----------
 
Sarcasm is the body's natural defense against stupidity
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”