New "Old Aircraft"

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog

Skyhunter
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 276
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 8:15 am
Location: Near YOW

New "Old Aircraft"

Post by Skyhunter »

So, now that the Twin Otter is back in production, what other out of production aircraft would you like to see back on the assembly line and why?
---------- ADS -----------
 
gapper
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 108
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 7:02 pm

Re: New "Old Aircraft"

Post by gapper »

With the consultation and blessing of Canadian Forces, the Buffallo for SAR. Politically, it makes great sense. Brian Mullroney, and his mob of whack-jobs screwed Western Canada out of the F-18 maintaince contract.Reasons...1/ We have LOTS of empty hanger-space in Western Canada. 2/ This project could be a JV with the companys allready desperate for work. 3/ This could be a life-line for City Center-Edmonton. 4/ Lets get some engineers back to work (with a good wage), before they all wake up,and become plumbers. 5/ P&W are laying off now, so all of Canada would benifit...Just an uneducated thought.
---------- ADS -----------
 
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance-that principle is contempt prior to investigation." -Herbert Spencer
Rockie
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8433
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 7:10 am

Re: New "Old Aircraft"

Post by Rockie »

P-51's

I figure if they make another 10 million of them they'll be cheap enough for me to buy one.
---------- ADS -----------
 
linecrew
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1900
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:53 am
Location: On final so get off the damn runway!

Re: New "Old Aircraft"

Post by linecrew »

Well I would have said the DC-9 but they're already doing that (sort of) in China.

The COMAC ARJ-21:

Image

Image
---------- ADS -----------
 
Heliian
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1976
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 2:14 pm

Re: New "Old Aircraft"

Post by Heliian »

As long as they keep the jettison tailcone and safety rope slide in the back I'm all for it. I've always wanted to dump one of those out.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Oor Wullie
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 74
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: South of 60

Re: New "Old Aircraft"

Post by Oor Wullie »

Something about the modest radial engines, thick wings and tail wheel that get my mojo flowing of the DC-3.

Beautifully symmetrical, and looks like it should always be flying.

Less than 400 in service today out of 16000+ in the 30-40's :cry:

I would love to get my hands on the controls of a 3
---------- ADS -----------
 
Everyone makes mistakes. The trick is to make mistakes when nobody is looking.

Some days you're the dog, somedays you're the fire hydrant.
golden hawk
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 696
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 8:43 am

Re: New "Old Aircraft"

Post by golden hawk »

The Avro Arrow.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Kilo-Kilo
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 623
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 2:47 pm
Location: West Coast

Re: New "Old Aircraft"

Post by Kilo-Kilo »

How about a turbine equipped Cessna 195, a little old with new.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Bushav8er
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 936
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 11:37 am
Location: Northern Can

Re: New "Old Aircraft"

Post by Bushav8er »

Kilo-Kilo wrote:How about a turbine equipped Cessna 195, a little old with new.
Why ruin a classic round engine? Now put a turbine on a Norseman and you'll have a load haulin', never quit, tank :P
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
hz2p
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1086
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 9:38 am

Re: New "Old Aircraft"

Post by hz2p »

C185 with a turbocharger. Call it the "Mountain Goat"!
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Invertago
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1921
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 9:21 pm

Re: New "Old Aircraft"

Post by Invertago »

Cessna 172... oh wait they're still building them.
---------- ADS -----------
 
No trees were harmed in the transmission of this message. However, a rather large number of electrons were temporarily inconvenienced.
The Barrel Man
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 10:47 pm

Re: New "Old Aircraft"

Post by The Barrel Man »

Rebuild the C-46 with PW123 or PW150 engines. Lighten it up with whatever new tech you can put in without getting off of the original type certificate, slap a nice glass cockpit in her and start hauling freight till ya pass out. I'll make a million!. Say, what ever happened to the turbo Caribou idea after the crash? Is Pen Air still around?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Thunder Bay radio, HEG is in the airborne section, call final for 27
Kilo-Kilo
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 623
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 2:47 pm
Location: West Coast

Re: New "Old Aircraft"

Post by Kilo-Kilo »

Bushav8er wrote:
Kilo-Kilo wrote:How about a turbine equipped Cessna 195, a little old with new.
Why ruin a classic round engine? Now put a turbine on a Norseman and you'll have a load haulin', never quit, tank :P
"Pot to Kettle.....looking black!"
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Bushav8er
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 936
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 11:37 am
Location: Northern Can

Re: New "Old Aircraft"

Post by Bushav8er »

Kilo-Kilo wrote:
Bushav8er wrote:
Kilo-Kilo wrote:How about a turbine equipped Cessna 195, a little old with new.
Why ruin a classic round engine? Now put a turbine on a Norseman and you'll have a load haulin', never quit, tank :P
"Pot to Kettle.....looking black!"
LOL, I suppose but I was thinking more like C195 classic private verses Norseman workhorse.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Doc
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 9241
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 6:28 am

Re: New "Old Aircraft"

Post by Doc »

The Cessna 150. Seriously. Follow the KISS principal. We need simple reliable airplanes the common sot can afford to operate.

Piper J3.

Piper Navajo. One where the wheels will go down, all on their own.

As for the Avro Arrow? Bring Diefenbaker back to life, and put a bullet through his brain!

Me109? P51? P40? This could be a never ending list. My Dad told me, at the end of the war, you could pick up Harvards for 250$!! Should have filled a few barns with them.......maybe somebody did?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Kilo-Kilo
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 623
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 2:47 pm
Location: West Coast

Re: New "Old Aircraft"

Post by Kilo-Kilo »

Doc, my friend who is just shy of 60 was telling me of his dad buying B26's out of Edmonton after the war at the price of 75 bucks for scrap.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Driving Rain
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2696
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:10 pm
Location: At a Tanker Base near you.
Contact:

Re: New "Old Aircraft"

Post by Driving Rain »

My favourite war bird...

http://www.stormbirds.com/project/galle ... june_2.htm

Brand new ME 262's
---------- ADS -----------
 
Doc
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 9241
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 6:28 am

Re: New "Old Aircraft"

Post by Doc »

Hey Cat! Just imagine brand spanking new Grumman Tiger Cats!
YUM!
---------- ADS -----------
 
supercub7
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 7:31 pm

Re: New "Old Aircraft"

Post by supercub7 »

Found this on wikipedia.
In November 2007, Antilles Seaplanes of Gibsonville, North Carolina announced it was restarting production of the Grumman Goose.[1] PWC PT6A-34 turboprops will replace the original Pratt & Whitney piston engines,[1] and the airframe and systems will be updated, increasing the seating capacity from eight to 10 places; the aircraft will be known as the Antilles Super Goose. The first example is now being assembled
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Darkwing Duck
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 430
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:30 am

Re: New "Old Aircraft"

Post by Darkwing Duck »

I think it is fantastic they are bringing back the Twotter. This was an aircraft that was very difficult to replace, Cessna could not do it with the Caravan.

But I would love to see the Tutor brought back. An aircraft built like a brick shit house and a sense of Canadianism back in the Air Force. Just re-engine it for better fuel economy and range, and a new avionics suite and you got yourself a dream machine.

Some one else also mentioned it here, sorry cannot remember who. The good ole Buffalo, The aircraft that can land on a dime and leave you a nickle change. Loiter time is forever and the speeds are perfect for SAR.

I would love to see more Canadian built machines in the world but the CRJ just doesn't cut it. Cramped , unreliable, no heavy loads.

But realy there are oh so many classics.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Kowalski: Sir, we may be out of fuel.
Skipper: What makes you think that?
Kowalski: We've lost engine one, and engine two is no longer on fire.
AEROBAT
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 554
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 11:27 am

Re: New "Old Aircraft"

Post by AEROBAT »

The little Mooney Mite would be a neat airplane to see back in production. I always wanted to fly one.
---------- ADS -----------
 
HS-74
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 11:45 am

Re: New "Old Aircraft"

Post by HS-74 »

HS-748 - can't beat the old girl
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Cat Driver
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 18921
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm

Re: New "Old Aircraft"

Post by Cat Driver »

Hey Cat! Just imagine brand spanking new Grumman Tiger Cats!
YUM!
True, but just imagine paying for the fuel to fly one. :mrgreen:

In 1961 I was in Vero Beach Fla. to buy a new Pawnee 235, just down the road in Ft. Pierce there were seven P38's for sale, flyable for $700.00 each.

If only one could have looked ahead and known what they would be worth today.

I flew the Mooney Mite in 1954 at the Toronto Island airport..it was a marvelous little toy.
---------- ADS -----------
 
The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no


After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
linecrew
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1900
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:53 am
Location: On final so get off the damn runway!

Re: New "Old Aircraft"

Post by linecrew »

Oor Wullie wrote:Something about the modest radial engines, thick wings and tail wheel that get my mojo flowing of the DC-3.

Beautifully symmetrical, and looks like it should always be flying.

Less than 400 in service today out of 16000+ in the 30-40's :cry:

I would love to get my hands on the controls of a 3
Basler is rebuilding them with turbines and a bunch of innovative upgrades. So much so in fact that they had to call it the BT-67.

Image

Image

Image
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
shannon
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 178
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 2:05 pm
Location: CYVR

Re: New "Old Aircraft"

Post by shannon »

Buffalo. Beaver. Cardinal.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”