Spoilerons anyone??

This forum has been developed to discuss Bush Flying & Specialty Air Service topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, North Shore, Rudder Bug

Post Reply
SuperchargedRS
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1485
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 1:30 am
Location: the stars playground

Spoilerons anyone??

Post by SuperchargedRS »

I will be doing a considerable amount of flying in a PA34-200 with spoilerons. Seems very responsive at speed, lower speeds it lags a bit.

Anyone have any experience with these things?

Thanks
---------- ADS -----------
 
Heliian
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1976
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 2:14 pm

Re: Spoilerons anyone??

Post by Heliian »

Spoilerons, the most deadly animal known to man.

Be extremely careful at low speed, as when you bank, you are destroying lift on one side. I don't have any experience with your a/c in question but I know of a few wrecks in the mu-2 caused by low speed/altitude turns.

Keep er shiny side up :)
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Bushav8er
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 936
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 11:37 am
Location: Northern Can

Re: Spoilerons anyone??

Post by Bushav8er »

The Seneca has spoilerons?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Heliian
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1976
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 2:14 pm

Re: Spoilerons anyone??

Post by Heliian »

Ah, you mean flaperons. big difference there, I have no piper experience but flaperons are standard kit for Robertson Stol and are employed on many a/c. You probably won't notice any difference until you let the flaps out but the r/stol kits also incorporate other changes like cuffs and drooped tips. Again, no pipers for me but it sure makes the 185 perform a hell of a lot better.

Cheers
---------- ADS -----------
 
SuperchargedRS
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1485
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 1:30 am
Location: the stars playground

Re: Spoilerons anyone??

Post by SuperchargedRS »

Heliian wrote:Ah, you mean flaperons.
Nope, the entire trailing edge of the wing is just a flap and on the top portion of the wing the PA34 has spoilerons (similar to the MU2). However the Seneca does not have the double-slotted flaps which I believe was one of the contributing factors to the fatalities of the MU2 (retracting flaps at low speed thus reducing the amount of wing your flying with due to the double-slotted flaps).

I will try to remember to take a few pics for you guys, very strange kit on this PA34
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
The Old Fogducker
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1784
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 5:13 pm

Re: Spoilerons anyone??

Post by The Old Fogducker »

The MU-2 was/is an excellent designed aircraft that has been flown into the ground by people who generally were without proper training on type, or suffered from a severe case of Pilot HUB Disease (Head Up Butt.)

Fly it the way the factory says to do it, and it is very good at what it was made to do. Go for a do-it-yourself checkout, or buckshee training as a step up from a Navajo, and do dumb stuff that shows the pilot knows little to nothing about flying higher performance aircraft, and it will .... rightfully so .... bite you.

Why anyone would chose to blame the aircraft when somebody retracts flap below appropriate speed when the Fowler Flap increases the wing area by almost 30% and then wonders why the stall characteristics change is the one with problems.

Incidently, that type of accident is exceptionally rare.

The typical MU-2 accident is to land short of the runway with a high sink rate because the pilot failed to fly with instrument reference.

Its like trying to forever call the Cessna Citation a piece of crap for Thurman Munson's "mistake" at the controls near Canton, Ohio in the late 70's.

Here's an article regarding the effect of proper training on MU-2 accidents.

http://www.ainonline.com/news/single-ne ... ate-23519/

Regards to all,
The Old (Former MU-2 Check Pilot) Fogducker
---------- ADS -----------
 
double-j
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 462
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 10:04 am

Re: Spoilerons anyone??

Post by double-j »

Is the A/C reg GOMG?

Centennial used to use OMG for multi training in the nineties.

jj
---------- ADS -----------
 
Heliian
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1976
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 2:14 pm

Re: Spoilerons anyone??

Post by Heliian »

I was not doggin the MU-2, i think it's a great plane and I agree with the lack of training issue. It's the only a/c that I personally know of that uses spoilerons that's all and now adding the rare seneca 2 with whatever weird kit is on it. Man, those garrett's are some sweet screamin devils. :twisted: :twisted:
---------- ADS -----------
 
200hr Wonder
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2212
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 1:52 pm
Location: CYVR
Contact:

Re: Spoilerons anyone??

Post by 200hr Wonder »

double-j wrote:Is the A/C reg GOMG?

Centennial used to use OMG for multi training in the nineties.

jj

OMG was and still is at PFC, has been for years.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Cheers,

200hr Wonder
double-j
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 462
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 10:04 am

Re: Spoilerons anyone??

Post by double-j »

200hr Wonder wrote:
double-j wrote:Is the A/C reg GOMG?

Centennial used to use OMG for multi training in the nineties.

jj

OMG was and still is at PFC, has been for years.
Roger that. It was at centennial in yxd for a long time. I did my multi ifr with it in '94.

I know PFC and centennial were together, not too sure if they are still.

jj
---------- ADS -----------
 
Meatservo
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2581
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 11:07 pm
Location: Negative sequencial vortex

Re: Spoilerons anyone??

Post by Meatservo »

Few people are aware that it was I who, long ago, invented "flapavators". Due to lack of specialized training, however, the one prototype aircraft crashed, and all information on the subject has been swept under the rug.
---------- ADS -----------
 
If I'd known I was going to live this long, I'd have taken better care of myself
Heliian
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1976
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 2:14 pm

Re: Spoilerons anyone??

Post by Heliian »

FLAPOILERVATORONS KICK ASS
---------- ADS -----------
 
beaverbob
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 722
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:34 pm
Location: BC

Re: Spoilerons anyone??

Post by beaverbob »

While most Robertson STOL kits interconnect the ailerons with the flaps, like the Beaver, with the Seneca Robertson did away with the Ailerons altogether and extended the flaps from wing tip to wing tip. Then added spoilers as the only roll control.

Works great and allows for some very short take off runs. The spoilers make the roll a bit sensitive at slow speeds but is quickly overcome with a few hours flight time.

I flew these for a few years commercially out of YXS in the early 80's
Nothing dangerous about them at all.
Bob
---------- ADS -----------
 
iflyforpie
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8132
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:25 pm
Location: Winterfell...

Re: Spoilerons anyone??

Post by iflyforpie »

Meatservo wrote:Few people are aware that it was I who, long ago, invented "flapavators". Due to lack of specialized training, however, the one prototype aircraft crashed, and all information on the subject has been swept under the rug.
Been on Cessnas for years. Pull the Johnson Bar on an older 172 or 182, levitate off the runway. We tried one time to see how many 'touch and goes' we could do in one circuit just moving the bar up and down. I would imagine it would work the same for the 180/185 in wheel landing attitude. YRMV.


beaverbob wrote:.... the Seneca Robertson....
I get this picture in my head when I hear about a Seneca with a Robertson STOL...

Image :?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Geez did I say that....? Or just think it....?
Post Reply

Return to “Bush Flying & Specialty Air Service”