No such luck. It's some dreary old accounting crap the media is trying to whip up into a frenzy.
Yawn. I guess if there's no news, the media figures it needs to create some.
http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/03/02 ... g-scandal/
Yawn. Not much of a "scandal", really. Quite a disappointment. I would really prefer a juicy sex scandal involving late-night orgies in Parliament. You know, something entertaining.According to a federal court of appeal ruling last week, in late 2005 the Conservative Party had nearly maxed out its $18-million party spending limit a month in to the federal election campaign. So party officials devised a scheme to funnel money through the campaigns of various candidates who weren’t likely to spend their personal campaign limit.
The party invited candidates to participate in a joint “regional media” campaign to purchase radio and television ads that would run in their local riding, according to the ruling. The party wired the candidates money for the ads and within minutes transferred the money back to the party headquarters. The party told candidates they could claim the money as campaign expenses, with the government reimbursing them for 60% of the cost from taxpayer funds.
The court noted the ads that eventually ran were all identical and promoted leader Stephen Harper with only a tag line stating they had been approved by the official agent of the local candidate. Candidates claimed widely varying expenses for the ads, from as little as $1,092 to as much as $30,000, amounts the court of appeal said closely mirrored amounts left in their personal election spending limits.
The plan was derailed when Elections Canada refused to allow the candidates to claim the money as a local campaign expense in a protracted dispute that saw Elections Canada enlist the RCMP for a raid on Conservative Party headquarters in 2008.
In January, 2010, a federal court sided with the Conservative Party, arguing that candidates could claim expenses for the ads. But the court of appeal ruling last week overturned the judgment, saying Elections Canada had a right to question the expenses. The Conservatives have vowed to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, a move campaign finance experts say will finally bring some clarity to federal spending limit loopholes.