A Metro Passenger

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog

Doc
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 9241
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 6:28 am

A Metro Passenger

Post by Doc »

Got a trip in the back of a Metro today. Must admit, it's been a while. I had forgotten how absolutely HIDEOUS it is from a passenger's point of view. Now, as a pilot I have a few hours in a Metro, and I remember them as flying a Hell of a lot nicer than they look. I won't name the airline, because that's really irrelevant. What IS relevant is the total lack of creature comforts a passenger can expect while riding one. Now, I've ridden around in the back of our airplanes (most of you know what they are) and they are 200% more comfortable than a Metro. It amazes me, that in a time of Q400's, Saab 340's and ATR's passengers are still subjected to these "racks" of aviation. Yes, I know they're cheap. I know all the "reasons" they still ply the skies. But come on. They're CRAP!
---------- ADS -----------
 
ahramin
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 6317
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:21 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: A Metro Passenger

Post by ahramin »

Amen.

Even worse than a Jetstream.
---------- ADS -----------
 
iflyforpie
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8133
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:25 pm
Location: Winterfell...

Re: A Metro Passenger

Post by iflyforpie »

<stretches to get crick out of neck and circulation in legs> WHAT!!!!?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Geez did I say that....? Or just think it....?
Kabloona
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:18 pm

Re: A Metro Passenger

Post by Kabloona »

I don't know, I flew on a Bearskin Metro last year and the flight was alright. I was expecting a terrible experience from hearsay but other than the cramped quarters it was a positive experience.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Panama Jack
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3263
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 8:10 am
Location: Back here

Re: A Metro Passenger

Post by Panama Jack »

The only reason why Metros still ply the airways in Canada with certain operators is that they were not able to import Antonov AN-24's.
---------- ADS -----------
 
“If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. If it stops moving, subsidize it.”
-President Ronald Reagan
User avatar
Darkwing Duck
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 430
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:30 am

Re: A Metro Passenger

Post by Darkwing Duck »

Sure the Metro is loud and cramped and uncomfortable, (Never flown as a pax in one but have been upfront) but so was the F28 when Canadian and Air North drove them along with Tin CanJets -37s. (the NG not the Jurasics.) And the CRJ is not pleasant either sitting in the window seat.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Kowalski: Sir, we may be out of fuel.
Skipper: What makes you think that?
Kowalski: We've lost engine one, and engine two is no longer on fire.
User avatar
BTD
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1580
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 8:53 pm

Re: A Metro Passenger

Post by BTD »

I think I probably fly for the airline you are referring to. Granted they aren't the most creature comfort based aircraft.

From a flying perspective they are okay but nothing to write home about. But for the operator they are a great aircraft, that allows them to provide service to certain areas that might not otherwise receive service because other aircraft aren't as economical. It might not be worth it to stop in for that 1 or 2 passengers.

Every person is going to have their perspective on certain aircraft. I hope that this does not degenerate into a thread about the Metro being an unsafe aircraft. I see it heading in that direction. I am aware that isn't what Doc meant though.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by BTD on Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
747-875
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: Yukon

Re: A Metro Passenger

Post by 747-875 »

Darkwing Duck wrote:...but so was the F28 when Canadian and Air North drove them along with...
As far as I know Air North has never operated the F28. I believe Canadian North had a pair of them for a couple years though.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rudy
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1171
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 10:00 am
Location: N. Ont

Re: A Metro Passenger

Post by Rudy »

Darkwing Duck wrote:And the CRJ is not pleasant either sitting in the window seat.
It gets quite loud when the engines get into those harmonic resonance pulses. Is there no way to sync the engines on a jet like you would with a propellor driven airplane? The Q400 takes longer but at least I can take a nap in the back of that one.
---------- ADS -----------
 
CID
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3544
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 6:43 am
Location: Canada

Re: A Metro Passenger

Post by CID »

We need to compare apples to apples here and I think to do that we need to zone in on the players. Bearskin Metro interiors are basic but decent. Perimeter on the other hand is almost like riding in a garbage can complete with the filth.

It really has little to do with the airplane type and everything to do with the operator. You'll never make the cabin bigger or quieter but you can certainly do better than sewer tube decor, dirty seats and hearing defender headsets strapped to the wall with steel wire.

Of course none of that stops Perimeter's select clientele from scratching their initials into the windows or sidewalls or writing their full names in permanent marker.

And comparing a Metro with a CRJ or an F28?? Seriously?
---------- ADS -----------
 
sky's the limit
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 4614
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 11:38 am
Location: Now where's the starter button on this thing???

Re: A Metro Passenger

Post by sky's the limit »

CID wrote:
And comparing a Metro with a CRJ or an F28?? Seriously?

You beat me to it.

Ah the Lawn Dart... brings back not so find memories of a misguided few months in Grade 9 when I filled in for a friend at Mc Donald's while their family went on vacation.... Beep, Beep, Beep, "Hey, get the damn fries out already!"

stl
---------- ADS -----------
 
Doc
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 9241
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 6:28 am

Re: A Metro Passenger

Post by Doc »

BTD, no names mentioned. However I will go on to say.....IN NO WAY IS THE METRO UNSAFE!!! It's just HORRID!! As a passenger. I've flown worse aircraft from a pilot's point of view.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Expat
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2383
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 3:58 am
Location: Central Asia

Re: A Metro Passenger

Post by Expat »

Panama Jack wrote:The only reason why Metros still ply the airways in Canada with certain operators is that they were not able to import Antonov AN-24's.
We recently upgraded (?) from a Dash 7 here to an AN-26 :smt040
---------- ADS -----------
 
Success in life is when the cognac that you drink is older than the women you drink it with.
User avatar
Nark
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2967
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: LA

Re: A Metro Passenger

Post by Nark »

Why drive around a Cadillac, when the Honda Civic is paid for?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
Semper Fidelis
“De inimico non loquaris male, sed cogites"-
Do not wish death for your enemy, plan it.
User avatar
Darkwing Duck
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 430
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:30 am

Re: A Metro Passenger

Post by Darkwing Duck »

747-875 wrote:
Darkwing Duck wrote:...but so was the F28 when Canadian and Air North drove them along with...
As far as I know Air North has never operated the F28. I believe Canadian North had a pair of them for a couple years though.
I actually meant to say Cnd North. I'll take the 15yds for objectional conduct.
CID wrote:
And comparing a Metro with a CRJ or an F28?? Seriously?
Metro and F28 = Loud
Metro and CRJ = Cramped

I could go on and on and on and on and... (you get the point) of comparing this and that and the other thing. I was not looking at performance or cost per hr or whatever else....That is all.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Kowalski: Sir, we may be out of fuel.
Skipper: What makes you think that?
Kowalski: We've lost engine one, and engine two is no longer on fire.
JayVee
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 217
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 3:24 pm

Re: A Metro Passenger

Post by JayVee »

I thought this was going to be a thread about a dude wearing eye makeup and billabong clothes, who smells nice. :shock:
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
oldtimer
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2296
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Calgary

Re: A Metro Passenger

Post by oldtimer »

The problem with the Metro is that they are both safe and efficient.
Almost every operator with Metro's made money with the damn things so they have a tendency to stick around.
The Beech 1900 is a more comfortable airplane but it is also more expemsive.
People will put up with shit if it is cheap. Just look at Walmart.
---------- ADS -----------
 
The average pilot, despite the somewhat swaggering exterior, is very much capable of such feelings as love, affection, intimacy and caring.
These feelings just don't involve anyone else.
User avatar
Les Habitants
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 226
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:15 pm

Re: A Metro Passenger

Post by Les Habitants »

sky's the limit wrote:
CID wrote:
And comparing a Metro with a CRJ or an F28?? Seriously?

You beat me to it.

Ah the Lawn Dart... brings back not so find memories of a misguided few months in Grade 9 when I filled in for a friend at Mc Donald's while their family went on vacation.... Beep, Beep, Beep, "Hey, get the damn fries out already!"

stl
:lol: :lol: :lol:

I chortled at that one.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Les Habitants
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 226
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:15 pm

Re: A Metro Passenger

Post by Les Habitants »

sky's the limit wrote:
CID wrote:
And comparing a Metro with a CRJ or an F28?? Seriously?

You beat me to it.

Ah the Lawn Dart... brings back not so find memories of a misguided few months in Grade 9 when I filled in for a friend at Mc Donald's while their family went on vacation.... Beep, Beep, Beep, "Hey, get the damn fries out already!"

stl
:lol: :lol: :lol:

I chortled at that one.

The Metro is lots of fun to fly (make sure you have a good headset if you're in a Metro 2), but as a passenger, I agree with Doc. Very little space, crap seats, cramped, little room to put your carry on, etc.
CID wrote:
Of course none of that stops Perimeter's select clientele from scratching their initials into the windows or sidewalls or writing their full names in permanent marker.
Bingo.
---------- ADS -----------
 
xTally
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 6:49 pm

Re: A Metro Passenger

Post by xTally »

Plenty of space in the cabin... if you're below a certain height threshold :)
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rowdy
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5166
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:26 pm
Location: On Borrowed Wings

Re: A Metro Passenger

Post by Rowdy »

I'd rather get rocked and hypoxic down low in the ol' nine niner airliner ;)
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
KAG
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3619
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 11:24 pm

Re: A Metro Passenger

Post by KAG »

Rudy wrote:
Darkwing Duck wrote:And the CRJ is not pleasant either sitting in the window seat.
It gets quite loud when the engines get into those harmonic resonance pulses. Is there no way to sync the engines on a jet like you would with a propellor driven airplane? The Q400 takes longer but at least I can take a nap in the back of that one.
You have to sync the engines on the rj just like you would a turbo prop. It drove me nuts flying those with the engines ou of sync!!!
---------- ADS -----------
 
The feet you step on today might be attached to the ass you're kissing tomorrow.
Chase lifestyle not metal.
Rudy
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1171
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 10:00 am
Location: N. Ont

Re: A Metro Passenger

Post by Rudy »

KAG wrote:
Rudy wrote:
Darkwing Duck wrote:And the CRJ is not pleasant either sitting in the window seat.
It gets quite loud when the engines get into those harmonic resonance pulses. Is there no way to sync the engines on a jet like you would with a propellor driven airplane? The Q400 takes longer but at least I can take a nap in the back of that one.
You have to sync the engines on the rj just like you would a turbo prop. It drove me nuts flying those with the engines ou of sync!!!
So it's just pilot indifference when the passengers have to listen to that for almost the whole flight?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Doc
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 9241
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 6:28 am

Re: A Metro Passenger

Post by Doc »

Rowdy wrote:I'd rather get rocked and hypoxic down low in the ol' nine niner airliner ;)
Now there's a POS! Never been in the back. Never again want to be in the front. Make the entire fleet into beer cans!
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Nark
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2967
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: LA

Re: A Metro Passenger

Post by Nark »

Doc wrote:
Rowdy wrote:I'd rather get rocked and hypoxic down low in the ol' nine niner airliner ;)
Now there's a POS! Never been in the back. Never again want to be in the front. Make the entire fleet into beer cans!

Them's is Fight'n Words!!


Although I've never flown an airplane where I needed to turn up the radio volume to full during takeoff. The only good thing about flying the Airliner is Multi Turbine PIC in the logbook. Other than that, leaves a bit of to be desired.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
Semper Fidelis
“De inimico non loquaris male, sed cogites"-
Do not wish death for your enemy, plan it.
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”