DME hold entry

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

CaptPup
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 6:36 pm

DME hold entry

Post by CaptPup »

Hello everyone.

I've got another question, but this time regarding dme holds. Is it basically the same thing as holding at a vor station?

Here's a clearance: FZLJ is cleared to hold IB 200 between 10 and 15dme of the MSS VOR.

The whole pod thing, doesn't that only work if i'm heading directly for the station? How would i set myself up to hold between 10 and 15dme IB on 200? I've never done one of these as the aircraft i fly are not dme capable. Any input would be greatly valued!
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Panama Jack
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3265
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 8:10 am
Location: Back here

Post by Panama Jack »

Works either heading to or heading from VOR-- normally given when established on a radial or airway. Established on R-200, start your turn at 10 DME, don't take timing, then turn again the reciprocal heading at 15 DME. Holds made easy.
---------- ADS -----------
 
“If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. If it stops moving, subsidize it.”
-President Ronald Reagan
CaptPup
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 6:36 pm

Post by CaptPup »

cool. given that, i'm at 5dme and they want me to hold 10-15dme. Do i establish myself OB on the radial, then once closer to 15dme, do a tear drop and come back around on R-200 and hold as cleared?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Typhoon pilot
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 4:32 pm

Post by Typhoon pilot »

Yup you got it
---------- ADS -----------
 
Live like you will die today
Dream like you will live forever
User avatar
chipmunk
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 993
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 1:14 pm
Location: Canada

Post by chipmunk »

Good luck on your ride! :)
---------- ADS -----------
 
CaptPup
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 6:36 pm

Post by CaptPup »

Thanks for the quick replies folks! Seems pretty straightforward

Thanks Chipmunk! The ride is on Friday, i'll let you know how it goes! :D
---------- ADS -----------
 
flyinhigh
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3133
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 7:42 pm
Location: my couch

Post by flyinhigh »

good luck cat,
sounds like you understand it pretty good
---------- ADS -----------
 
centerstored
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 237
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 4:16 pm

Post by centerstored »

The entry to a DME hold is always either a parrallel or direct entry...unless you're from the military and know point to point Nav, or have RNAV. :idea:
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Panama Jack
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3265
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 8:10 am
Location: Back here

Post by Panama Jack »

Here is another little hint straight from the IFR-guerillas that you probably weren't taught in flying school (which is, of course, the reason AvCanada was invented :wink: ). Don't forget that in the real world of flying, if you are given holds you can always ask the controller to give you DME leg lengths. Want to forget about timing and adjusted timing to correct for the winds? Next time he asks you to hold at the VOR, ask him to give you 10 mile leg lengths. That way you turn at the VOR, turn again at 10 DME-- and you can have more time to relax and have time to review your approach plate.
---------- ADS -----------
 
“If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. If it stops moving, subsidize it.”
-President Ronald Reagan
balls
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 249
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 3:28 pm

Post by balls »

if you are referring to the hold discussed here, they did give him distant leg lengths. 5 DME legs.

The initial posting was unclear about the hold clearance, referring to IB 200. That was vague.

Everyone made the assumption that the clearance was the 200 degree radial of the MSS VOR. That initial post would not be a correct clearance, and sounded more like a bearing.

Always remember EFC or depart time. Check fuel, wxx, alt wxx. Manage the cockpit. Hand over control if necessary, or delegate. Even if it is a single pilot operation and TC checker, tell him to get the weather for you, update ATIS, etc. Use the autopilot.
---------- ADS -----------
 
CaptPup
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 6:36 pm

Post by CaptPup »

hmm what would a more correct clearance be then?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
JigglyBus
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 497
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 5:09 pm

Post by JigglyBus »

centerstored,

Why do you say that entry to a DME hold is always P or D?

If you want to eliminate any entry, it would more likely be Parellel.

-Direct is obvious.

-Teardrop is simple, 30deg left of your outbound heading, right turn to INTERCEPT the radial inbound to the fix.

-Parellel would require you to fly your outbound heading, then left turn direct to the fix. This would be difficult, as the fix is a DME location, however, it is possible by intercepting the radial, rather than flying direct to the fix.

Why would you decide to eliminate the teardrop?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
bluesideup
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 62
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 6:14 am
Location: Winnipeg

DME Holds

Post by bluesideup »

Panama Jack,

If you were to ask ATC to do as you suggested during a TC ride do you think the examiner would allow that or would they make you time it as per a standard hold procedure.

...just thinking out loud here but if you were to exercise PIC authority and the examiner asked you to use timing and you refused under PIC authority can the examiner fail you.

B S U
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
JigglyBus
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 497
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 5:09 pm

Post by JigglyBus »

Bluesideup,

That's no different than if the examiner asks you to do this ILS, but you say 'no, it's nice out, I'm doing the visual'.

He asks you to do what he want to evaluate you on, if you refuse for reasons other than safety, your gonna have a rough ride.
---------- ADS -----------
 
gryphon
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 135
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 11:09 am

Post by gryphon »

PJ is eluding to the real world....if ATC gives you something you're not happy with, request what you want....if TC wants to see something from an examiners point of view, then show him that.
---------- ADS -----------
 
moe
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 250
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 3:20 pm

Post by moe »

Jigglybus, unless you have RNAV you can only do the teardrop if you are outbound on the radial. and if you are already established outbound on the radial you may as well do the parallel.
IMHO
---------- ADS -----------
 
pitot
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 126
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 8:59 pm

Post by pitot »

Just a little advise. Always get the upper winds if there are any at the field your ride is at. It will make your holds and approaches alot easier. You can anticipate what the wind will do on your first leg out and correct for it then instead of waiting till it blows you through your inbound, or so far out you're using a huge intercept to get back. Also reference your GPS if it is a NDB hold. Set up the OBS. It makes life alot easier.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
JigglyBus
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 497
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 5:09 pm

Post by JigglyBus »

Moe,

What does RNAV have to do with anything?

You have to get to the fix first. If you have rnav, great, if you don't you'll have to intercept the radial and track to the dme.

You can do any entry you wish. In the SPECIFIC hold he was talking about, (Hold SW, Radial200 Inbound between 10-15dme, with the aircraft established on r200 at 5dme) you could do either teardrop or parellel. It is right on the boundary, so it's you're preference.

It has absolutely nothing to do with RNAV.

Perhaps you were thinking about an outbound DME hold from that position, which would ofcourse be a direct entry. As in, fly to 15dme, right turn to 020, fly to 10 dme, right to 200.
---------- ADS -----------
 
CaptPup
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 6:36 pm

Post by CaptPup »

hey folks

guess i understood it pretty well, got my multi-ifr today. :D

i'm up for a multi job, any takers? wishful thinking :lol: soon!

CaptPup.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
chipmunk
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 993
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 1:14 pm
Location: Canada

Post by chipmunk »

Congrats!
Did you get a DME hold after all that?
:)
---------- ADS -----------
 
confuzed
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 443
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 11:37 am

Post by confuzed »

JigglyBus wrote:Moe,

What does RNAV have to do with anything?

You have to get to the fix first. If you have rnav, great, if you don't you'll have to intercept the radial and track to the dme.

You can do any entry you wish. In the SPECIFIC hold he was talking about, (Hold SW, Radial200 Inbound between 10-15dme, with the aircraft established on r200 at 5dme) you could do either teardrop or parellel. It is right on the boundary, so it's you're preference.

It has absolutely nothing to do with RNAV.

Perhaps you were thinking about an outbound DME hold from that position, which would ofcourse be a direct entry. As in, fly to 15dme, right turn to 020, fly to 10 dme, right to 200.
Why would you have to go to the fix first?? If you're inbound/outbound say on the 250 degree radial, just turn and intercept the radial you want and take it from there. If you intercept it before the 10 mile point outbound, just keep on tracking the 200 out using the parallel entry. If you intercept it after the 10 mile (say at 16 or 14, etc) then track inbound and do a direct. I guess it depends how you're cleared, and where you are at the time.
---------- ADS -----------
 
You start with a bag full of luck and an empty bag of experience. The trick is to fill the bag of experience before you empty the bag of luck.
User avatar
Yoyoma
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1465
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 4:01 am
Location: Somewhere in time...

Post by Yoyoma »

CaptPuppy wrote: i'm up for a multi job, any takers? wishful thinking :lol: soon!

CaptPup.
With that sense of humor, you should be able get one pretty soon!

Congrats!!!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Image In the business world, the rearview mirror is always clearer than the windshield...W. Buffett
CaptPup
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 6:36 pm

Post by CaptPup »

yep got a dme hold. same hold (as practised with instructor) two engines, under da hood... fun! awesome guy doing the ride too!
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
oldtimer
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2296
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Calgary

Post by oldtimer »

This is directed mostly at "blue side up". Why a DME hold as opposed to a hold. It is usually done as an ALTERNATE means of establishing the "protected area". If you are cleared to hold at a specific radial and DME mileage with no outbound mileage given, then timing will establish the boundary of the hold, hence the maximum speed in a hold. But if ATC or local terrain demands or allows, ATC can establish a hold within a specific mileage. If, for example, the hold is for flow control, ATC can assign 10 mile legs as opposed to the one minute just to reduce the workload. I have had 20 mile legs while we wait for a CB to pass by the airport. The clearance was to TORON, Hold as Published, 20 mile legs. So I held between the 45 DME and 65 DME. It is very simple. Intercept the inbound radial, fly to the cleared DME(45 miles), turn right (or left) and fly to the second mileage(65 miles). Very simple. Just remember the KISS principle. Keep It Simple Stupid(Sir). This is used a lot in the mountains where geography is challenging and ATC wants you in a very specific airspace.
---------- ADS -----------
 
The average pilot, despite the somewhat swaggering exterior, is very much capable of such feelings as love, affection, intimacy and caring.
These feelings just don't involve anyone else.
User avatar
JigglyBus
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 497
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 5:09 pm

Post by JigglyBus »

Confuzed...

The 10dme point on the radial IS the fix. I didn't say get to the VOR first.

Read it again.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”