Cessna - Glider Midair Collision near Pemberton
Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako
Cessna - Glider Midair Collision near Pemberton
News 1130 reporting CFB comox confirms 2 dead in a glider/cessna mid air. Witnesses reported seing 2 white wings slowly fluttering to the ground.
http://www.news1130.com/2013/06/29/fata ... pemberton/
http://www.news1130.com/2013/06/29/fata ... pemberton/
- Shiny Side Up
- Top Poster

- Posts: 5335
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:02 pm
- Location: Group W bench
-
North Shore
- Rank Moderator

- Posts: 5622
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 3:47 pm
- Location: Straight outta Dundarave...
Re: Glider crash - Pemberton
Terrible news.
If anyone has information on whose glider please pm me.
If anyone has information on whose glider please pm me.
- MikeGolfEcho
- Rank 3

- Posts: 136
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 8:41 pm
Re: Glider crash - Pemberton
Any further news? My sincere condolences to all affected 
Last edited by MikeGolfEcho on Fri Jul 05, 2013 7:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
bizjets101
- Rank 10

- Posts: 2105
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:44 pm
Re: Glider crash - Pemberton
TSB reports a Cessna and a Powered Glider, victims 4 persons and 1 dog.
Some brutal details regarding the collision - should be more info in 6pm Vancouver news.
Note' Pemberton Soaring Centre just added a Stemme SV10VT
Pemberton Soaring Centre website
Some brutal details regarding the collision - should be more info in 6pm Vancouver news.
Note' Pemberton Soaring Centre just added a Stemme SV10VT
Pemberton Soaring Centre website
Re: Glider crash - Pemberton
Certainly a tragedy.
I didn't know they had a Stemme. I went to their factory east of Berlin a few years ago. Pretty interesting machine. Maybe it is normal in the glider world, but I thought it was interesting how they have solar panels to charge the battery. Most of the aircraft is composite but there is a metal cage structure around the central fuselage area.
I didn't know they had a Stemme. I went to their factory east of Berlin a few years ago. Pretty interesting machine. Maybe it is normal in the glider world, but I thought it was interesting how they have solar panels to charge the battery. Most of the aircraft is composite but there is a metal cage structure around the central fuselage area.
-
bizjets101
- Rank 10

- Posts: 2105
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:44 pm
Re: Glider crash - Pemberton
Powered Gliders at Pemberton BC
There is a single seat Glaser-Dirks DG-400, and a Pipistrel Taurus two seat -
both powered gliders, along with the Stemme SV-10VT.
Press report police have stated the Cessna was based at 100 Mile Airport.
There is a single seat Glaser-Dirks DG-400, and a Pipistrel Taurus two seat -
both powered gliders, along with the Stemme SV-10VT.
Press report police have stated the Cessna was based at 100 Mile Airport.
Re: Glider crash - Pemberton
There are only two 150's registered to owners in 100 mile house, one to a forest products company and the other to a private owner.
This is the first time in quite a while that I can remember, where the news photos of the wreckage don't happen to show the registration letters of either aircraft.
This is the first time in quite a while that I can remember, where the news photos of the wreckage don't happen to show the registration letters of either aircraft.
-
RatherBeFlying
- Rank 7

- Posts: 684
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:27 am
- Location: Toronto
Re: Glider crash - Pemberton
Most gliders these days have flight loggers; so, TSB will likely be able to determine the flight path of the glider.
I don't know if the Pemberton gliders are equipped with PowerFlarms, which also warn against Mode C and S equipped aircraft. But if the 150 was not operating a transponder, a PowerFlarm would not issue any warning.
Yesterday we were testing our PowerFlarms which detected a Mode C 1200' above our field within 2 miles.
I don't know if the Pemberton gliders are equipped with PowerFlarms, which also warn against Mode C and S equipped aircraft. But if the 150 was not operating a transponder, a PowerFlarm would not issue any warning.
Yesterday we were testing our PowerFlarms which detected a Mode C 1200' above our field within 2 miles.
-
iflyforpie
- Top Poster

- Posts: 8132
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:25 pm
- Location: Winterfell...
Re: Glider crash - Pemberton
Don't FLARMs require a SSR interrogation of the transponder in order to work? Lots of radar blind spots in BC, and it is foolish to rely solely on those for traffic avoidance.
Re: Glider crash - Pemberton
I am sorry to hear this terrible news. I did a tow checkout on Rudy's Citabria 3 years ago and flew gliders and tow planes in BC for 3 summers for a different operator. Followed the news of the Stemme on it's acquisition last year, then heard this news today. Terrible thing to hear.
Condolences to the families of all involved.
-Colin
Condolences to the families of all involved.
-Colin
-
RatherBeFlying
- Rank 7

- Posts: 684
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:27 am
- Location: Toronto
Re: Glider crash - Pemberton
Correct: The PowerFlarm does not interrogate transponders; it only picks up replies.
Agreed it's only a supplement to lookout, but just about every pilot who's spent time with one finds there's a whole bunch more aircraft out there than s/he's been seeing.
Agreed it's only a supplement to lookout, but just about every pilot who's spent time with one finds there's a whole bunch more aircraft out there than s/he's been seeing.
- Colonel Sanders
- Top Poster

- Posts: 7512
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 5:17 pm
- Location: Over Macho Grande
Re: Glider crash - Pemberton
That's because they aren't paying enough attentionthere's a whole bunch more aircraft out there than s/he's been seeing
to LOOKING OUTSIDE - they're probably playing with
the toys in the panel. Frankly, I don't know why many
of them even went flying. Why not save the money
and just play with Msoft FlightSim, if all you care about
is what's in the panel?
You wouldn't believe the percentage of pilots that I
fly with, that have severely deficient lookout skills. I
ask them to turn left, they do so without looking
first. Ouch.
Forget the electronic toys which sucker you in and
fill you with a false sense of confidence. If you hit
an aircraft without a VHF comm or mode C, it's
going to hurt just as much
Only two things keep you from a mid-air:
1) paranoia
2) eyeballs
Your paranoia should crank up when you are someplace
with an unnatural concentration of aircraft (final, VOR,
etc).
And do try LOOKING OUTSIDE more. I doubt that
there is a single person reading this, that couldn't
improve their visual scanning skills.
Final thought, sure to upset people: You may have all
sorts of aircraft buzzing about. But you can only hit
the ones that are at the same altitude as you. I have
to laugh when I hear aircraft at say 9500 feet calling
UNICOM, telling them that they are flying overhead
the airport, 1.5 miles vertically above.
You would be amazed at how many pilots don't think
in 3 dimensions. They don't use the vertical - they
drive an airplane around like a car. To resolve a conflict,
I change altitude. Radical thought, I know. I don't mind
in the least pitching up, gaining 1000 feet, rolling upside
down and looking down at the traffic beneath me.
Last edited by Colonel Sanders on Mon Jul 01, 2013 6:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Glider crash - Pemberton
+1 Great guy.pez wrote:I am sorry to hear this terrible news. I did a tow checkout on Rudy's Citabria 3 years ago and flew gliders and tow planes in BC for 3 summers for a different operator. Followed the news of the Stemme on it's acquisition last year, then heard this news today. Terrible thing to hear.
Condolences to the families of all involved.
-Colin
Re: Glider crash - Pemberton
Does anyone have a current VNC for the area ?
I cannot find a CYA for aerobatics in that valley on my old copy.
I cannot find a CYA for aerobatics in that valley on my old copy.
Re: Glider crash - Pemberton
Colonel Sanders wrote:That's because they aren't paying enough attentionthere's a whole bunch more aircraft out there than s/he's been seeing
to LOOKING OUTSIDE - they're probably playing with
the toys in the panel. Frankly, I don't know why many
of them even went flying. Why not save the money
and just play with Msoft FlightSim, if all you care about
is what's in the panel?
You wouldn't believe the percentage of pilots that I
fly with, that have severely deficient lookout skills. I
ask them to turn left, they do so without looking
first. Ouch.
Forget the electronic toys which sucker you in and
fill you with a false sense of confidence. If you hit
an aircraft without a VHF comm or mode C, it's
going to hurt just as much![]()
Only two things keep you from a mid-air:
1) paranoia
2) eyeballs
Your paranoia should crank up when you are someplace
with an unnatural concentration of aircraft (final, VOR,
etc).
And do try LOOKING OUTSIDE more. I doubt that
there is a single person reading this, that couldn't
improve their visual scanning skills.
Final thought, sure to upset people: You may have all
sorts of aircraft buzzing about. But you can only hit
the ones that are at the same altitude as you. I have
to laugh when I hear aircraft at say 9500 feet calling
UNICOM, telling them that they are flying overhead
the airport, 1.5 miles vertically above.
You would be amazed at how many pilots don't think
in 3 dimensions. They don't use the vertical - they
drive an airplane around like a car. To resolve a conflict,
I change altitude. Radical thought, I know. I don't mind
in the least pitching up, gaining 1000 feet, rolling upside
down and looking down at the traffic beneath me.
Why you look out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6GRUp_3nZo
Re: Glider crash - Pemberton
I believe CYA116 is the glider area... Just northwest of the airport. I can't tell where Nairn Falls is relative to that... I'm not that familiar with the airspace up there... Only been to Pemberton once!2R wrote:Does anyone have a current VNC for the area ?
I cannot find a CYA for aerobatics in that valley on my old copy.
Re: Glider crash - Pemberton
Two things come to mind reading this... First, I've done exactly what you described... Imminent head on with a floatplane, so I pitched up 30degrees, gained 500', then started a roll... As my wing dropped out of view vertically I picked up the floatplane, which passed under me as I rolled inverted. The floatplane never budged from its route.Colonel Sanders wrote:You would be amazed at how many pilots don't think
in 3 dimensions. They don't use the vertical - they
drive an airplane around like a car. To resolve a conflict,
I change altitude. Radical thought, I know. I don't mind
in the least pitching up, gaining 1000 feet, rolling upside
down and looking down at the traffic beneath me.
Second, it's worth pointing out that if a collision seems likely, that vertical excursions (push or pull) are a quicker way out than turns. Assuming you both start straight and level, of course. Two parallel wings can pass each other with about 5-10' of separation, in most cases. Two wings at 90degrees to one another have to clear the full wingspan of the other plane.
Re: Glider crash - Pemberton
This is how TCAS works; it provides commands to provide vertical separation.AirFrame wrote:...it's worth pointing out that if a collision seems likely, that vertical excursions (push or pull) are a quicker way out than turns.
Pemberton Accident
I still can't believe the news about the unfortunate accident in Pemberton.
The Pemberton Soaring Center helped many people get their start in aviation - towing gliders for the season, getting glider licenses, doing glider rides, etc. and this was true for me.
I haven't been up there in a number of years, but my heart goes out to R.R.'s family.
He was a great person to work for, and this was a real shock.
The Pemberton Soaring Center helped many people get their start in aviation - towing gliders for the season, getting glider licenses, doing glider rides, etc. and this was true for me.
I haven't been up there in a number of years, but my heart goes out to R.R.'s family.
He was a great person to work for, and this was a real shock.
-
crazy_aviator
- Rank 8

- Posts: 917
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 10:13 am
Re: Glider crash - Pemberton
Im just as at fault as anyone else, especially in my younger years ( reading an aviation mag while flying up north !!) Nowadays, the big sky theory just doesnt cut it with me. The owner of the C-150 , I believe, met me the day before to look at my airplane, brings it close to home. On another thread, IF you confirm an aircraft that is passing you DONT fixate, that A/C wont hurt you ,,, its the one your not looking for thats gonna kill ya, so confirm, resolve, THEN continue to look for more
Another thing, NEVER speak frivolously near an airport,,leave the frequency open for position reports, switch to air to air if you want to gossip 
Re: Cessna - Glider Midair Collision near Pemberton
I too flew with Rudy, and remember him well. I liked his straight-to-the-point attitude. I regret not spending more time up there. He will be missed.
Re: Cessna - Glider Midair Collision near Pemberton
What a terrible thing to hear about. In my mind a mid-air is about the second scariest thing that can happen in an airplane (right behind in-flight fire for those who wondered).
I saw a VERY near miss once between a high and low wing aircraft in a circuit. I was NORDO at the time so all I could do was watch it unfold. Not a nice feeling and something I hope I never experience again.
The sky is not quite as big as many people think.
LnS.
I saw a VERY near miss once between a high and low wing aircraft in a circuit. I was NORDO at the time so all I could do was watch it unfold. Not a nice feeling and something I hope I never experience again.
The sky is not quite as big as many people think.
LnS.


