MAX!

Discuss topics relating to Westjet.

Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog

stickontheice
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:13 am

MAX!

Post by stickontheice »

WestJet Airlines Ltd. has signed a letter of intent to buy 65 of Boeing Co.’s new 737 MAX single-aisle planes for $6.3-billion (U.S.) at current list prices.

The Calgary-based low-cost airline said Thursday that delivery of the new fleet is scheduled to start in September, 2017.

The proposed order is for 40 737 MAX 8, and 25 737 MAX 7, aircraft.

Excellent news and very exciting.
---------- ADS -----------
 
goaroundthrust
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: FL 330

Re: MAX!

Post by goaroundthrust »

787 next
---------- ADS -----------
 
rudder
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4127
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 12:10 pm

Re: MAX!

Post by rudder »

goaroundthrust wrote:787 next
And fly to where?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
privateer
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 507
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 10:49 am

Re: MAX!

Post by privateer »

Your moms house.
---------- ADS -----------
 
razorblade
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 252
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 7:31 am
Location: YYZ

Re: MAX!

Post by razorblade »

privateer wrote:Your moms house.
:lol: :smt040


:prayer:
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
KAG
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3619
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 11:24 pm

Re: MAX!

Post by KAG »

Lmao...theres nothing like a well timed "your mom...."
---------- ADS -----------
 
CAL
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1376
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 8:47 pm

Re: MAX!

Post by CAL »

does this mean that westjet guys get MAX money:)
just kidding I know it doesnt...
---------- ADS -----------
 
F-16
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 250
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 1:11 pm

Re: MAX!

Post by F-16 »

Hope your mom has a big enough landing strip :lol:
---------- ADS -----------
 
bmc
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4014
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Switzerland

Re: MAX!

Post by bmc »

EDITED
---------- ADS -----------
 
yycflyguy
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2788
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 9:18 am

Re: MAX!

Post by yycflyguy »

How many Fins are being returned to leasor? Is this net growth or just replacement for the older series?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rumors
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 4:11 pm

Re: MAX!

Post by Rumors »

Canada's second-largest domestic carrier said its fleet of 103 Boeing aircraft could ultimately range between 120 and 162 over 10 years as older models come off lease and some planes are sold.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Realitychex
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 552
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 2:37 pm

Re: MAX!

Post by Realitychex »

Betting on status quo in the Canadian airline industry over a 7-10 year window is a pretty risky bet, especially when a number of operators have been consistently unable to produce annual operating profits....

8)
---------- ADS -----------
 
bmc
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4014
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Switzerland

Re: MAX!

Post by bmc »

As fuel prices remain high, and may rise, the Max is an impressive machine. 16% lower fuel burn than the current A320, 4% less than the Neo. It's expected to meet or beat range projections than the Neo. There are more than 1,400 on order. If you want one, best to order sooner rather than later.

Depending on deliveries, WS maintains a a fresh young fleet with more cost effective equipment. Given the the lag from order to putting on the line, when is the optimum time to do this?

Common fleet type. Similar cockpits. No aging fleet maintenance concerns. Excellent dispatch reliability. Of course no one can predict the future. But I think this represents good planning.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
privateer
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 507
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 10:49 am

Re: MAX!

Post by privateer »

Now if Boeing can just fix this mess care of Southwest.

You see back in the 90's there was thing that came out called AUTO.
Screen Shot 2013-09-04 at 1.36.27 PM.png
Screen Shot 2013-09-04 at 1.36.27 PM.png (466.47 KiB) Viewed 9021 times
Screen Shot 2013-09-04 at 1.32.23 PM.png
Screen Shot 2013-09-04 at 1.32.23 PM.png (331.36 KiB) Viewed 9021 times
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Lateralus
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 205
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 5:48 pm

Re: MAX!

Post by Lateralus »

privateer wrote:Now if Boeing can just fix this mess care of Southwest.

You see back in the 90's there was thing that came out called AUTO.
Screen Shot 2013-09-04 at 1.36.27 PM.png
Screen Shot 2013-09-04 at 1.32.23 PM.png

Doesn't sound like its going to happen. Sounds like its going to be a common type to the NG with just a differences course. Oh well, still gonna be pretty nice ride. 8)
---------- ADS -----------
 
El Comat
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 589
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 5:01 pm
Location: Sudbury

Re: MAX!

Post by El Comat »

I was told by one of our CPs that the overhead panel will be addressed to a certain extent. Lets hope they get rid of the icicles!

EC
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
yyz monkey
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 317
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 8:36 am
Location: CNC3

Re: MAX!

Post by yyz monkey »

El Comat wrote:I was told by one of our CPs that the overhead panel will be addressed to a certain extent. Lets hope they get rid of the icicles!

EC
But they're ever so much fun to catch the top of your skull on!
---------- ADS -----------
 
CAL
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1376
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 8:47 pm

Re: MAX!

Post by CAL »

especially when they lose that white cover just be careful which one you bump....:)
---------- ADS -----------
 
CAL
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1376
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 8:47 pm

Re: MAX!

Post by CAL »

double submit
---------- ADS -----------
 
stickontheice
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:13 am

Re: MAX!

Post by stickontheice »

Anyone know what the top end speed of the Max will be? See some articles saying it'll cruise at .79 mach. Would be nice to be going a bit faster than that. Although in these days of fuel savings I would imagine that we won't be anyways.
---------- ADS -----------
 
W5
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1004
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 4:44 pm
Location: Edmonton,AB

Re: MAX!

Post by W5 »

.79 was on the low end when the NG just got on the line.
---------- ADS -----------
 
FL020
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 269
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 6:32 pm

Re: MAX!

Post by FL020 »

.79 on the low end? We haven't been able to find an NG that cruises any faster than .73 these days! Anytime we return from ymm, we're slowed up at 370 because they're going -.74!

what's the deal boys?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Skyblazer
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 9:45 pm

Re: MAX!

Post by Skyblazer »

.73 .74 in cruise is an exaggeration.

Typical speeds .75 ranging to .78 and descent speeds from 256 to 280

Its called a Cost Index

It saves gas and it results in profit.

Thats the DEAL
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rem
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 184
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 6:52 pm

Re: MAX!

Post by Rem »

Short stage lengths (ie in and out of YMM) mean typically lower altitudes, which means lower cruise speeds for a given cost index. Anything above 360-370 and cruise will be .76+. Get slowed down above that altitude it's probably some other reason.
---------- ADS -----------
 
#37
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 9:43 am

Re: MAX!

Post by #37 »

Rem wrote:Short stage lengths (ie in and out of YMM) mean typically lower altitudes, which means lower cruise speeds for a given cost index. Anything above 360-370 and cruise will be .76+. Get slowed down above that altitude it's probably some other reason.
Smart guy rem! :)
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “WestJet”