Do you need a 702 or 703 OC for this?

[Colonel Sanders]

Or maybe both?

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2014/06/08 ... latestnews

MONTREAL – Three inmates have escaped from a detention center in Quebec City with the help of a helicopter, police said late Saturday.

It's the second helicopter-aided inmate escape in Quebec province in two years.

I sense some new questions for the CPL written ...

[old_man]

Depends was the pilot hired or were the passengers just incidental to the trip and sharing the costs?

[frozen solid]

This would be how I would escape: (except you'd need four of them to lift me out of there):


http://youtu.be/77uK19KxMuI

[Kokanee]

You would only need a POC if the heli was owned by the Angels, as i heard all three inmates were members. So it would be transporting company employees in their own heli.

[Colonel Sanders]

I wonder if the helicopter was turbine powered?

Everyone knows you need some sort of OC to
operate a turbine engine.

I'm pretty sure you would need an OC for this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJyAA0oPAwE



But maybe not for this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGeSIM_8BHY


The e-test people might give you some static.

[Big Pistons Forever]

TC is investigating as it appears the PIC failed to give a complete safety brief to the Prisoners.....errr Passengers prior to lifting off.

[CamAero]

Long awaited changes are coming to 604.

My expectation is that those changes will capture any previous oversights in order that these types of operations will now fall under 702 / 703.

With credit to the crew and passengers, evidently their Risk-Assessment method was adequate and effective.

I wonder if they sketched a fish-bone diagram? Or, did they ask themselves "The Five Whys"?

One my pals, from up here in the stix; he starts every mission with the question, "What could possibly go wrong?.."

Good Job Gang.