No fighters for RCAF

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
HiLo
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 246
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 12:58 pm

No fighters for RCAF

Post by HiLo »

C.R. (Buzz) Nixon was deputy minister of National Defence from 1975 to 1983.
And this unelected bureaucrat thinks the RCAF needs no fighter jets...that must mean that the next time Soviet long-range bombers (which have been making more frequent incursions into Canada's ADIZ lately) pierce our airspace, we should give them a hug.....much too Canadian.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-de ... d/follows/
---------- ADS -----------
 
dave_091
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 171
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 8:06 pm

Re: No fighters for RCAF

Post by dave_091 »

HiLo wrote:
C.R. (Buzz) Nixon was deputy minister of National Defence from 1975 to 1983.
And this unelected bureaucrat thinks the RCAF needs no fighter jets...that must mean that the next time Soviet long-range bombers (which have been making more frequent incursions into Canada's ADIZ lately) pierce our airspace, we should give them a hug.....much too Canadian.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-de ... d/follows/
I commented on this article in the globe and mail, the response I received was :

The Russians call us before they fly over our airspace due to the open skies treaty


I couldn't respond to his nitwit reply. Not worth my time.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Illya Kuryakin
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1311
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:14 pm
Location: The Gulag Archipelago

Re: No fighters for RCAF

Post by Illya Kuryakin »

Personally, I think the money would be better spent building a world class coast guard. Fighter jets do appeal more to our collective egos, and that's a fact.
Illya
---------- ADS -----------
 
Wish I didn't know now, what I didn't know then.
mdh
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 11:18 pm

Re: No fighters for RCAF

Post by mdh »

edited
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by mdh on Sun Jul 13, 2014 6:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Moose47
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1348
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2008 2:45 pm
Location: Home of Canada's Air Defence

Re: No fighters for RCAF

Post by Moose47 »

G'day "BUZZ OFF NIXON!"


"Personally, I think the money would be better spent building a world class coast guard"

Will they be armed? Will they be unionized like the current Canadian Coast Guard is?
What could or would they do if they encounter the Russian Navy escorting ships through the Canadian territorial waters. Friendly waves of course, we're Canadians after all.

I'm air force but I think the Royal Canadian Navy should be strengthened to a respectable level that ensures they can carry out any mission they are tasked with.

We need a carrier!

My Bonnie lies over the ocean
My Bonnie lies over the sea
Well my Bonnie lies over the ocean
Yeah bring back my Bonnie to me

[Chorus]
Yeah bring back, ah bring back
Oh bring back my Bonnie to me to me
Oh bring back, oh bring back
Oh bring back my Bonnie to me

[Pre-Chorus]
Well my Bonnie lies over the ocean
My Bonnie lies over the sea
Yeah my Bonnie lies over the ocean
Oh I said bring back my Bonnie to me

Cheers...Chris
---------- ADS -----------
 
azimuthaviation
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1409
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:34 pm

Re: No fighters for RCAF

Post by azimuthaviation »

Moose47 wrote:What could or would they do if they encounter the Russian Navy escorting ships through the Canadian territorial waters.
What should they do?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Genetk44
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 9:31 pm

Re: No fighters for RCAF

Post by Genetk44 »

I remember when the gummit was talking about replaceing tanks with those 105mm. upgunned LAVs....forget what they were actually called...but some military guys were telling me that the worst part of that idea was how quickly our military would lose the actual skill sets required to use,fight and maintain tanks should we ever have been required to re-equip and use them in the future if we had gotten rid of them. It was something like within 5 years of loseing the tanks we would have lost enough skill sets and experienced men and officers to other jobs within the military as well as retirements,death and illness that it would take something like at least 10 years to rebuild just those skills....after getting tanks to actually use. Seems to me that that same scenario would play out if you get rid of the fighters.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”