FedEx quietly begin single-pilot tests - ATR 42
Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog
-
- Rank 2
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2019 7:06 pm
- complexintentions
- Rank 10
- Posts: 2186
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 3:49 pm
- Location: of my pants is unknown.
Re: FedEx quietly begin single-pilot tests - ATR 42
What's coming? A plane that can be flown remotely?
Pretty sure that's already been done for some time now.
Not just with one pilot, but with NO pilots on board.
Can you IMAGINE?!
Pretty sure that's already been done for some time now.
Not just with one pilot, but with NO pilots on board.
Can you IMAGINE?!

I’m still waiting for my white male privilege membership card. Must have gotten lost in the mail.
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1900
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:53 am
- Location: On final so get off the damn runway!
Re: FedEx quietly begin single-pilot tests - ATR 42
To your point, how much do you want to bet that FedEx is somehow involved with funding this research: https://www.flightglobal.com/business-a ... 47.articlecomplexintentions wrote: ↑Fri Feb 19, 2021 7:48 am What's coming? A plane that can be flown remotely?
Pretty sure that's already been done for some time now.
Not just with one pilot, but with NO pilots on board.
Can you IMAGINE?!![]()
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1900
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:53 am
- Location: On final so get off the damn runway!
Re: FedEx quietly begin single-pilot tests - ATR 42
My bad...FedEx is involved with a different company on this concept. https://www.unmannedairspace.info/lates ... sna-c208s/linecrew wrote: ↑Fri Feb 19, 2021 7:52 amTo your point, how much do you want to bet that FedEx is somehow involved with funding this research: https://www.flightglobal.com/business-a ... 47.articlecomplexintentions wrote: ↑Fri Feb 19, 2021 7:48 am What's coming? A plane that can be flown remotely?
Pretty sure that's already been done for some time now.
Not just with one pilot, but with NO pilots on board.
Can you IMAGINE?!![]()
Re: FedEx quietly begin single-pilot tests - ATR 42
I guess they will need to explore FDT's --- again!! -- let's see 6 hours and 2 legs - just about right 

Black air has no lift - extra fuel has no weight
http://www.blackair.ca
http://www.blackair.ca
Re: FedEx quietly begin single-pilot tests - ATR 42
What do they need to test? Of course it would work. If the cockpit layout is made in an ergonomic fashion for single pilot no problem.
The issues have nothing to do with getting a good airplane off the ground and back on.
It's redundancy. "hey skipper, didn't ATC say 5,000 not 4,000"
Safety, if one pilot eats the fish.
Workload management. Sioux City or that QF380 (try doing that single pilot).
What happens when one pilot is weak? Let's face it were not all Val Kilmer running around at 100% all the time or for some of us ever. Often times one of the pilots may help carry the other pilot along.
I see single pilot airplanes being very simple to create. Move buttons a little closer to the driver. It's the intangibles that won't get solved for a while.
The issues have nothing to do with getting a good airplane off the ground and back on.
It's redundancy. "hey skipper, didn't ATC say 5,000 not 4,000"
Safety, if one pilot eats the fish.
Workload management. Sioux City or that QF380 (try doing that single pilot).
What happens when one pilot is weak? Let's face it were not all Val Kilmer running around at 100% all the time or for some of us ever. Often times one of the pilots may help carry the other pilot along.
I see single pilot airplanes being very simple to create. Move buttons a little closer to the driver. It's the intangibles that won't get solved for a while.
- schnitzel2k3
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1456
- Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 11:17 pm
Re: FedEx quietly begin single-pilot tests - ATR 42
Have you see the FedEx pilot compensation? It's no wonder they want to reduce the flight crew.
Re: FedEx quietly begin single-pilot tests - ATR 42
Sioux City was still a crash, but I bet FedEx 705 wouldn’t have happened single pilot. 

Re: FedEx quietly begin single-pilot tests - ATR 42
A bunch of dead boxes have less impact than a bunch of dead people. But it'll be hohum until there is an accident that could have been easily prevented by another properly trained brain up front and then smart people, not to mention insurance companies, will be going...hmmm. Transport airplanes are full of reduncancies and electronic comparator warnings for a reason, and the PM monitor and feedback role has been given a much higher profile by flight departments everywhere these last few years for the same reason.
Re: FedEx quietly begin single-pilot tests - ATR 42
I guarantee the day is coming. Once the airplanes become more and more automatic, one person will do. The same arguments were made when they got rid of the flight engineers: B747 with two pilots only!?? Why it cannot be! Is it safe? The companies have that as a low priority. It is perception more than anything, and not that encouraging for the pilot profession.
Re: FedEx quietly begin single-pilot tests - ATR 42
I also think it has taken longer than it should have for this to come up. There is absolutely no reason you need so many switches and knobs that all need turning at the same time in flight. I think it has been made just to keep pilots busy. The technology has been with us for years. It is obviously safer with two, but that probably won't stop single pilot heavies from happening, especially with freight, as already mentioned.
- schnitzel2k3
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1456
- Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 11:17 pm
Re: FedEx quietly begin single-pilot tests - ATR 42
They have some pretty interesting functions with the Garmin G3000 systems on smaller turboprop aircraft. I think the Meridian or TBM have auto-descent functions in the event of an emergency and will also land at the nearest suitable airport in the event of pilot incapacitation. Mind blown.
With the right amount of stubborness and investment I'm sure these technologies can easily be scaled up to 705 turbine aircraft.
With the right amount of stubborness and investment I'm sure these technologies can easily be scaled up to 705 turbine aircraft.
Re: FedEx quietly begin single-pilot tests - ATR 42
It’s not about technology because that already exists today.
Flight engineers used to be just that...engineers. They monitored and ran the complicated and decidedly unmonitored and non-automatic systems available at the time. They did not ever need to be pilots. Do you fly large transport airpłanes ayseven? I ask only because if you do your flight operations management is likely beating you over the head to not just sit there like a turnip when you’re PM. You have important things to do, and it’s not filling out the logbook.
Re: FedEx quietly begin single-pilot tests - ATR 42
Meanwhile in Canada...... TC recently makes it mandatory to fly a Twin Otter 2 crew while doing STOL.... errr.... RGR take-offs ..... guess it’s nice having help unloading the freight.
Re: FedEx quietly begin single-pilot tests - ATR 42
It might seem important to the employee, and for long term training to eventual captaincy, but in the world of technology, it is just redundancy in human activity. The job of PM is a relatively new one. Cojoes were hired to sit and watch gauges and talk on the radio in the old days.
To your other point: every single one of the guys I knew in the late 70's early 80's that were hired by AC, all started as FE. They of course went on to be capt on big machinery.
Now, am I ready to get on an airplane with one person flying? One could argue two admittedly very qualified 23 year olds is not much better. But that is over for a while anyways.
To your other point: every single one of the guys I knew in the late 70's early 80's that were hired by AC, all started as FE. They of course went on to be capt on big machinery.
Now, am I ready to get on an airplane with one person flying? One could argue two admittedly very qualified 23 year olds is not much better. But that is over for a while anyways.
Re: FedEx quietly begin single-pilot tests - ATR 42
What about something like the Hondajet? It can be flown single pilot and has push-button start, automatic lights, automatic anti-icing, automatic yaw damper, etc. Is there any reason why this kind of automation couldn't be implemented in a larger cargo jet?Rockie wrote: ↑Tue Feb 23, 2021 9:04 am Flight engineers used to be just that...engineers. They monitored and ran the complicated and decidedly unmonitored and non-automatic systems available at the time. They did not ever need to be pilots. Do you fly large transport airpłanes ayseven? I ask only because if you do your flight operations management is likely beating you over the head to not just sit there like a turnip when you’re PM. You have important things to do, and it’s not filling out the logbook.
Re: FedEx quietly begin single-pilot tests - ATR 42
Shall we remove our alternate power sources/standby systems? Flight/safety critical systems in airplanes are made redundant. Triple redundant. Please try and explain to me why that is the case without contradicting your above statement.
If you still require one pilot to fly/operate the plane, then he/she must also be made redundant as a flight critical piece to the puzzle.
Also, redundancy is one of the many important roles the PM brings to the cockpit. I don't know how you could work in the airlines and not know this. Unless you believe pilots are supermen who never make mistakes or choke on crew meals.

Re: FedEx quietly begin single-pilot tests - ATR 42
We're talking about transporting cargo here, not 300 people.
Re: FedEx quietly begin single-pilot tests - ATR 42
No, ayseven was talking about the effectiveness/importance (or lack thereof) of the PM/Cojo.
Re: FedEx quietly begin single-pilot tests - ATR 42
Single pilot night flying might not be the best idea...
It might only be cargo, but a cargo plane crash still makes a big crater on the ground.
It might only be cargo, but a cargo plane crash still makes a big crater on the ground.
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
Re: FedEx quietly begin single-pilot tests - ATR 42
What about something like the Hondajet? It can be flown single pilot and has push-button start, automatic lights, automatic anti-icing, automatic yaw damper, etc. Is there any reason why this kind of automation couldn't be implemented in a larger cargo jet?CpnCrunch wrote: ↑Tue Feb 23, 2021 12:27 pm [quote=Rockie post_id=<a href="tel:1145190">1145190</a> time=<a href="tel:1614096243">1614096243</a> user_id=5632]
Flight engineers used to be just that...engineers. They monitored and ran the complicated and decidedly unmonitored and non-automatic systems available at the time. They did not ever need to be pilots. Do you fly large transport airpłanes ayseven? I ask only because if you do your flight operations management is likely beating you over the head to not just sit there like a turnip when you’re PM. You have important things to do, and it’s not filling out the logbook.
[/quote]
I know nothing about a Honda Jet. I do know the MEL’s on large transport category aircraft are at least 5 inches thick because stuff breaks. I do know flight management is great when it’s programmed properly and a hindrance when it’s not, and also a hindrance when the environment gets dynamic. I know autoflight modes are super at menial tasks for long periods of time, and can kill you if used improperly. They are also of no use at all during many failures.
705 operations are a lot more stringent than the rules under which a Honda Jet operates, and if you extrapolated the Honda Jet single pilot operation out to the number of flights, hours and kind of all weather 24/7/365 operation routine at large carriers the accident rate would be horrific. Safety encompasses a lot more than just the automatic starter and other gizmos on the machine. Plus as I said, stuff breaks.
- Redneck_pilot86
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:47 pm
- Location: between 60 and 70
Re: FedEx quietly begin single-pilot tests - ATR 42
Most accidents have the pilot as a contributing factor. Pilots are the weakest link. They fail on a rate at least equal to any other component. Either they fail to respond appropriately to a situation, make decisions that get them in over their head, or deliberately crash. We'll see completely pilotless cargo aircraft in the next 20 years, and quite likely pilotless airliners.
The only three things a wingman should ever say: 1. "Two's up" 2. "You're on fire" 3. "I'll take the fat one"
Re: FedEx quietly begin single-pilot tests - ATR 42
Pilots in what area of the world ? Certain areas they are essentially just trained robots whereas others they know how to fly first then go to airlines.Redneck_pilot86 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 23, 2021 8:07 pm Most accidents have the pilot as a contributing factor. Pilots are the weakest link. They fail on a rate at least equal to any other component. Either they fail to respond appropriately to a situation, make decisions that get them in over their head, or deliberately crash. We'll see completely pilotless cargo aircraft in the next 20 years, and quite likely pilotless airliners.
Re: FedEx quietly begin single-pilot tests - ATR 42
Pilots are the strongest link. Statistics aren’t kept on how often pilots prevent accidents because nothing newsworthy happens, but it happens every single flight. It happens so often and so routinely apparently not even you are aware you’re doing it.Redneck_pilot86 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 23, 2021 8:07 pm Most accidents have the pilot as a contributing factor. Pilots are the weakest link. They fail on a rate at least equal to any other component. Either they fail to respond appropriately to a situation, make decisions that get them in over their head, or deliberately crash. We'll see completely pilotless cargo aircraft in the next 20 years, and quite likely pilotless airliners.
- complexintentions
- Rank 10
- Posts: 2186
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 3:49 pm
- Location: of my pants is unknown.
Re: FedEx quietly begin single-pilot tests - ATR 42
Hi Rockie, actually they do keep stats on this!
And you are correct.
Pilotless aircraft have been technically possible for many decades now. Autonomous drones are sold in bulk online. The impetus for removing the pilot from the cockpit is all about attempted cost savings, not "safety".
Human factors don't disappear with pilotless aircraft, they just shift the potential for error from a pilot to a computer engineer. All of the factors you mention are equally possible with pilotless aircraft: failing to respond appropriately (technical malfunction), incorrect "decisions" (ie programming/algos) and new threat vectors to deliberately crash them (ie hacking).
It is irrefutable that human pilots in their current role make flying safer, not less so. The idea that "pilot error" is the most significant factor degrading flight safety completely ignores the pilot's role in reducing that same rate they examine. It's an analytical blind spot that no less than NASA is trying to address.

Completely incorrect premise. The data is overwhelmingly conclusive that without human intervention the accident rate would be astronomically higher. It also identifies that one of the chief reasons for your commonly-quoted view is that both sides of the dataset are not being considered properly.Redneck_pilot86 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 23, 2021 8:07 pm Most accidents have the pilot as a contributing factor. Pilots are the weakest link. They fail on a rate at least equal to any other component. Either they fail to respond appropriately to a situation, make decisions that get them in over their head, or deliberately crash. We'll see completely pilotless cargo aircraft in the next 20 years, and quite likely pilotless airliners.
Pilotless aircraft have been technically possible for many decades now. Autonomous drones are sold in bulk online. The impetus for removing the pilot from the cockpit is all about attempted cost savings, not "safety".
Human factors don't disappear with pilotless aircraft, they just shift the potential for error from a pilot to a computer engineer. All of the factors you mention are equally possible with pilotless aircraft: failing to respond appropriately (technical malfunction), incorrect "decisions" (ie programming/algos) and new threat vectors to deliberately crash them (ie hacking).
It is irrefutable that human pilots in their current role make flying safer, not less so. The idea that "pilot error" is the most significant factor degrading flight safety completely ignores the pilot's role in reducing that same rate they examine. It's an analytical blind spot that no less than NASA is trying to address.
I’m still waiting for my white male privilege membership card. Must have gotten lost in the mail.